Navigation

    Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search

    Pkg_add never works

    pfSense Packages
    3
    8
    1213
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R
      R0thbard last edited by

      Every time I've tried to use the pkg_add command, it always looks in a directory that doesn't exist (packages-8.1-release).

      2.0.3-RELEASE (i386)
      built on Fri Apr 12 10:22:21 EDT 2013
      FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p13

      [2.0.3-RELEASE][root@myfwname.mydomainname]/root(1): pkg_add -r iplog
Error: Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.1-release/Latest/iplog.tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
pkg_add: unable to fetch 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.1-release/Latest/iplog.tbz' by URL
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        doktornotor Banned last edited by

        Upgrade to 2.1 (FreeBSD 8.3)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R
          R0thbard last edited by

          @doktornotor:

          Upgrade to 2.1 (FreeBSD 8.3)

          EDIT: I should look before I post, I see there's now a blog post. I'm going to update it now.

          I would, but I haven't seen a lot of news/information about it since it was released. I don't want to end up with any broken functionality. There's not even an announcement on the blog last I checked.

          Was this a known issue with 2.0.3?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K
            kejianshi last edited by

            My 2.1 64bit works perfectly so far if that makes you happy?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • R
              R0thbard last edited by

              @kejianshi:

              My 2.1 64bit works perfectly so far if that makes you happy?

              It doesn't bring enough joy and excitement to me that I would term myself "happy" because of it, however it does excite my childish-gimmicky love of the word 64-bit. I'm curious, have you run into any obstacles with 64-bit? Would it be worth running on my Atom 1.86 D2500CCE with 2GB of RAM? My memory utilization never rises above 6%, so the increased size of libraries wouldn't concern me.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K
                kejianshi last edited by

                No - With anything less than 4GB just run 32bit.  In most cases to this date with most software, given a choice, 32bit is more developed, vetted etc.  If you need 64bit or if you think you might add ram in later, then run 64bit.

                ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D <<<<  Do those make you happier?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R
                  R0thbard last edited by

                  @kejianshi:

                  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D <<<<  Do those make you happier?


                  lol

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • K
                    kejianshi last edited by

                    Well then…

                    I think it might be worth your time to go ahead with a 64GB install just to say you did if you can lay your hands on more RAM later.
                    RAM can be had for cheap and running squid with a RAM cache makes things speedy.
                    You can simultaneously fulfil your childish-gimmicky love of the word 64-bit while preparing for future upgrade.
                    Its supported.  http://ark.intel.com/products/59682


                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post