Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Snort 2.9.4.6 pkg v2.6.0 Update

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfSense Packages
    61 Posts 16 Posters 17.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      maverick_slo
      last edited by

      I do not have that entry in my crontab…
      Checked 2 pfsense production boxes, snort is working as expected...

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • N
        newbieuser1234
        last edited by

        Something weird I noticed is on package 2.5.9 with 2.1 on 64, it is blocking just fine.  But on 32 bit 2.6 on 2.1, I have the blocking issue where the table gets wiped.  Do you still think it's the function filter reload? I thought it was a 2.1 issue, but maybe it's a 2.6 snort issue?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • F
          fragged
          last edited by

          The behavior has been the same since 2.1 Snapshots. I'm running 64 bit and filter_reload will clear the snort2c table.

          It's not a huge issue as the offending host will get blocked again if it tries anything fishy.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • N
            newbieuser1234
            last edited by

            Are you running snort 2.5.9 or 2.6?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • F
              fragged
              last edited by

              Currently 2.6.0, but also 2.5.9 and earlier before and they all behave the same in this regard.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • N
                newbieuser1234
                last edited by

                I wonder what's different on mine? Can you control how often it reloads?  I am seeing hundreds of blocks still in place back two weeks or more since last reboot.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  Cino
                  last edited by

                  I've had barnyard2 enabled on 4 interfaces for the last 5 days and so far so good. Everything is running good and memory usage is right on the money

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • bmeeksB
                    bmeeks
                    last edited by

                    @Cino:

                    I've had barnyard2 enabled on 4 interfaces for the last 5 days and so far so good. Everything is running good and memory usage is right on the money

                    Thanks Cino.  I hope those pesky multiple instances are a thing of the past… ;)

                    Bill

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • F
                      fragged
                      last edited by

                      Snort won't start anymore after the last rules update:

                      
                      snort[37386]: FATAL ERROR: /usr/pbi/snort-amd64/etc/snort/snort_2226_em0/rules/snort.rules(266) Unable to process the IP address: [103.6.207.37,.
                      [/code]
                      
                      It seems to be one of the ET rules categories I had checked. Looks like I need to go through them all so see which.
                      
                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • V
                        val
                        last edited by

                        @fragged:

                        Snort won't start anymore after the last rules update:

                        
                        snort[37386]: FATAL ERROR: /usr/pbi/snort-amd64/etc/snort/snort_2226_em0/rules/snort.rules(266) Unable to process the IP address: [103.6.207.37,.
                        [/code]
                        
                        It seems to be one of the ET rules categories I had checked. Looks like I need to go through them all so see which.
                        
                        I am seeing the same thing here tho without the FATAL ERROR in log.
                        Snort just die right after a rule update.
                        

                        Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2 @ 3.20Ghz
                        Intel S1200KPR server board mini-ITX
                        A-data ECC 4GB x 2 1600MHz
                        Intel Ethernet Server Adapter I350-T2
                        Samsung 840 Pro 120GB
                        Lian-Li PC-Q15B

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • BBcan177B
                          BBcan177 Moderator
                          last edited by

                          Im running Snort 2.9.4.6 pkg v. 2.6.0 and Snort wont start on several of my pfsense boxes.

                          I disabled Emerging-botcc.rules and Snort started without any issues.

                          My Error was as follows:

                          snort[97526]: FATAL ERROR: /usr/pbi/snort-amd64/etc/snort/snort_43799_rl0/rules/snort.rules(266) Unable to process the IP address: [103.6.207.37,.

                          Any ideas?

                          Thanks

                          "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                          Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                          Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                          Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P
                            priller
                            last edited by

                            @BBcan17:

                            I disabled Emerging-botcc.rules and Snort started without any issues.

                            Thank You!!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • bmeeksB
                              bmeeks
                              last edited by

                              @BBcan17:

                              Im running Snort 2.9.4.6 pkg v. 2.6.0 and Snort wont start on several of my pfsense boxes.

                              I disabled Emerging-botcc.rules and Snort started without any issues.

                              My Error was as follows:

                              snort[97526]: FATAL ERROR: /usr/pbi/snort-amd64/etc/snort/snort_43799_rl0/rules/snort.rules(266) Unable to process the IP address: [103.6.207.37,.

                              Any ideas?

                              Thanks
                              [/quote]

                              UPDATED INFO:  After looking at the new Tuesday afternoon Emerging Threats Bot-CC rules files, I see it contains an error in all of the IP address ranges.  The IP addresses are separated by commas followed by a space.  Snort does not like that (the binary, not the package GUI).  It wants the IP ranges in the brackets to be comma-delimited with no spaces.  Only the ET Bot-CC file is affected.  I suspect the Emerging Threats guys will quickly fix the error and post a new update.

                              ORIGINAL GUESS:  ;)
                              My guess (without looking at the particular rules file) is a typo of some sort in the updated Emerging Threats rules.  Should get fixed quickly I would think (if I am right on the cause).

                              Bill

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • V
                                val
                                last edited by

                                @bmeeks:

                                @BBcan17:

                                Im running Snort 2.9.4.6 pkg v. 2.6.0 and Snort wont start on several of my pfsense boxes.

                                I disabled Emerging-botcc.rules and Snort started without any issues.

                                My Error was as follows:

                                snort[97526]: FATAL ERROR: /usr/pbi/snort-amd64/etc/snort/snort_43799_rl0/rules/snort.rules(266) Unable to process the IP address: [103.6.207.37,.

                                Any ideas?

                                Thanks
                                [/quote]

                                UPDATED INFO:  After looking at the new Tuesday afternoon Emerging Threats Bot-CC rules files, I see it contains an error in all of the IP address ranges.  The IP addresses are separated by commas followed by a space.  Snort does not like that (the binary, not the package GUI).  It wants the IP ranges in the brackets to be comma-delimited with no spaces.  Only the ET Bot-CC file is affected.  I suspect the Emerging Threats guys will quickly fix the error and post a new update.

                                ORIGINAL GUESS:  ;)
                                My guess (without looking at the particular rules file) is a typo of some sort in the updated Emerging Threats rules.  Should get fixed quickly I would think (if I am right on the cause).

                                Bill

                                Just an update too right after disable Emerging Threats rules, Snort starts just fine.

                                Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2 @ 3.20Ghz
                                Intel S1200KPR server board mini-ITX
                                A-data ECC 4GB x 2 1600MHz
                                Intel Ethernet Server Adapter I350-T2
                                Samsung 840 Pro 120GB
                                Lian-Li PC-Q15B

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • D
                                  digdug3
                                  last edited by

                                  Just updated all the rules, everything is fine again.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    simby
                                    last edited by

                                    Hi!

                                    I have problem with time,.. in pfsense is clook 7:52 on pfsense is 6:52 Why? How can i fix this?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • bmeeksB
                                      bmeeks
                                      last edited by

                                      @simby:

                                      Hi!

                                      I have problem with time,.. in pfsense is clook 7:52 on pfsense is 6:52 Why? How can i fix this?

                                      This is purely speculation on my part as I have no inside source of definitive data, but it looks like the Snort VRT server is routinely not available around or shortly after midnight U.S. Eastern Time.  Depending on where you are in the world, that will translate differently to your local time zone.  I know that I was regularly seeing issues doing Snort VRT updates between midnight and 1:00 AM U.S. Eastern Time.  I changed my updates to 1:30 AM U.S. Eastern Time and have not had another issue.

                                      As I said, you will need to adjust your rules update taking your local time zone (and any Daylight Savings Time adjustment) into account.  The idea is to make sure you do not try to update rules between 12:00 midnight and 1:00 AM U.S. Eastern Time.

                                      Bill

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S
                                        simby
                                        last edited by

                                        Hi!

                                        the problem in in alert log, on pfsense is time 4:23 and the same time in alet log is 2:23.

                                        How can i fix this?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • bmeeksB
                                          bmeeks
                                          last edited by

                                          @simby:

                                          Hi!

                                          the problem in in alert log, on pfsense is time 4:23 and the same time in alet log is 2:23.

                                          How can i fix this?

                                          Whoa!  That is weird.  Snort does not keep its own time.  It just uses system time.  Maybe it's some kind of time zone issue ???

                                          Do you have any other installed packages that log different times?  What about the firewall logs, do they show the correct time stamp, or are they off like the Snort log?

                                          Bill

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • T
                                            turker
                                            last edited by

                                            I got this error,  what does it mean?
                                            Thanks.

                                            pfsense 2.1 x64

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.