Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Small/quiet chassis, preferably 1U

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    10 Posts 5 Posters 4.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • V
      vegaman
      last edited by

      I'm upgrading my old NAS and planning to use my old motherboard/RAM to run pfsense, but since it will be on 24/7 I'd like it to be quiet.
      The motherboard is a SuperMicro X7SPA-H (Atom D510) with 2GB RAM. I will be using it with a 60/10mbps connection, upgrading to 100/50 or 100/100 whenever fibre becomes available. The network will also have 3 VLANs, but I don't anticipate needing to route between them, and I'd probably just upgrade to a Layer 3 switch if decide I want to.
      I'd like rackmount because I have other rackmount equipment (NAS, switches, etc.). But if it's small I can always just put it on a shelf in the rack - being quiet is more important.
      I'll probably want an expansion slot available so I can add an Intel NIC as well.

      I was looking at SuperMicro's offerings, but since they specialise in server gear I'm not sure if "low noise" means much coming from them.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T
        tridac
        last edited by

        Hi,

        I had the same problem about what hardware to use. For a lightly loaded network, pfsense could run fine on a P3 class machine, with moderate power consumption, but they are all getting a bit long in the tooth now, and more  difficult to find. However, if you are running snort agressively, you really need something like a P4 class machine. Server class machines are nearly all xeon and none that i've seen (Proliant DL140 etc) draw less than 80-100 watts, which is too high and overkill performance wise. Also, 1u rack mount boxes often have only a single pci / pcie slot, which means that you have to find a dual or quad network card if you need wan + >= 2 internal ports.

        Current solution is the small form factor ibm thinkcentre P4 machines, which you can find for 10 ukp on fleabay uk on a good day. Am using two of these, originally 3GHz processors, but they are socket 478 and a 1.6GHz P4 cpu is a drop in replacement. That combined with turning the cpu clock down to 399MHz, drops the power consumption from ~90watts to just under 50, which is fine. They have 2 x full height pci slots as well, which gives a bit more flexibility as to what network cards you can use…

        Chris

        Detachment from all bias and influence is the only way to get to the truth…

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • V
          vegaman
          last edited by

          I already have the motherboard/CPU/RAM as described in the OP. I'm just looking for a quiet chassis/PSU to fit in my rack. I would like to upgrade it (and reuse the chassis) at some later date too, possibly to an Avoton or Rangeley board if/when they're supported by pfsense. Definitely not going to be moving to a P4, far too inefficient and I'm not on a really tight budget. Not to say I want to throw money away - I'm thinking US$100 or so for the chassis/PSU.

          I don't mind only 1 expansion slot - I'm using mini-itx so I only have 1 PCI-e slot anyway.

          Things like snort will either wait until I upgrade or could be done on another box/VM.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • G
            geekGee
            last edited by

            The Super Micro CSE-502L-200B case for that mobo is very quiet.  I have a few systems that use that case and they are all, in my opinion, near silent.  The only fan is in the power supply.

            I did pick up a CSE-503L-200B, which uses the same power supply, and that one had a very noisy fan for some reason but that is always a possibility with anything that isn't fan-less.  I am not using it yet but plan on swapping the power supply before so.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              tridac
              last edited by

              I hear what you are saying, but the P4 is only inefficient at higher clock speeds. The 1.6GHz P4 + Powerd in pfsense on the minimum setting, brings down the power consumption to under 50watts and still have more than enough power to run snort with a lot of tables selected. Ymmv etc, but if you are running a web server, you really do need snort. The other thing about using an off the shelf box is that they are cheap enough to build a spare or two for the time when the hardware goes down, which it inevitably will at some stage :-)

              Anyway, compare that to an older Cisco box like the 515E, which is a P3 machine and draws nearly 50 watts for a fraction of the functionality. No arguement really…

              Chris

              Detachment from all bias and influence is the only way to get to the truth…

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • V
                vegaman
                last edited by

                @geekGee:

                The Super Micro CSE-502L-200B case for that mobo is very quiet.  I have a few systems that use that case and they are all, in my opinion, near silent.  The only fan is in the power supply.

                I did pick up a CSE-503L-200B, which uses the same power supply, and that one had a very noisy fan for some reason but that is always a possibility with anything that isn't fan-less.  I am not using it yet but plan on swapping the power supply before so.

                Thanks, just what I was looking for. I'll go with a SuperMicro case then. Worst case scenario I can always put a PicoPSU in it and use the SuperMicro one for something else, but I'd rather not need to.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A
                  asterix
                  last edited by

                  Atom D510 for pfSense only as a pure firewall OR you planning to add Snort, Dans (clamd), etc.. on it as well? If will work great as a pure firewall but if you are thinking of Snort, Dans or any other resource hungry package then I would advise you look at G530 or higher processor. You can still have fanless heat sinks on them and keep your system silent enough.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • V
                    vegaman
                    last edited by

                    It will be a pure firewall. And probably have occasional VPN connections for management if required - so high bandwidth isn't hugely important there.

                    I'd like to run more packages on it, but I already have the D510 board and don't want to spend too much for now. So I can just wait until I upgrade it for those.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A
                      asterix
                      last edited by

                      Cool. You could install Snort on it.. some folks have done it. But don't count much on response and performance on it after the service starts.

                      Keep off Snort and Dans (clamd) on this and you should be flying.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        jcyr
                        last edited by

                        For a small fanless (quiet) and reasonably powerful pfSense box, I'd go with a Habey BIS-6634 Intel Atom N2800 Fanless 4 Gigabit Ethernet with Bypass Segment Server/Security/Network Appliance.

                        IPV6 Test: http://ipv6-test.com

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.