• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Load Balancer showing wrong Status when using Alias's for the port

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
4 Posts 2 Posters 1.4k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S
    SysIT
    last edited by Nov 20, 2013, 2:54 PM

    Hello,

    I have come across the issue of using Load Balancer with Port Alias's and the status not showing properly in the GUI. I have submitted a bug report (https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/3330 ) but wanted to see if anyone else has experienced this issue.

    Checking using relayctl show summary shows the pool as being active with all 3 hosts.

    I have tested changing the name of the Alias to not include (_) underscores, but it does not work either (previous bug was using a (.) period would cause the Unknown - relayd not running? to show in the GUI

    The only way the Status in the GUI would show is if i put in a single port number instead of an Alias.

    I have restarted the relayd several times as well just to be sure.

    ![Firewall Port Alias.JPG](/public/imported_attachments/1/Firewall Port Alias.JPG)
    ![Firewall Port Alias.JPG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Firewall Port Alias.JPG_thumb)
    ![Load Balance Pool 01.JPG](/public/imported_attachments/1/Load Balance Pool 01.JPG)
    ![Load Balance Pool 01.JPG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Load Balance Pool 01.JPG_thumb)
    ![Load Balance Pool Status 01.JPG](/public/imported_attachments/1/Load Balance Pool Status 01.JPG)
    ![Load Balance Pool Status 01.JPG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Load Balance Pool Status 01.JPG_thumb)
    ![Load Balance Pool.JPG](/public/imported_attachments/1/Load Balance Pool.JPG)
    ![Load Balance Pool.JPG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Load Balance Pool.JPG_thumb)
    ![ralayctl show summary.JPG](/public/imported_attachments/1/ralayctl show summary.JPG)
    ![ralayctl show summary.JPG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/ralayctl show summary.JPG_thumb)
    ![Virtual Servers 01.JPG](/public/imported_attachments/1/Virtual Servers 01.JPG)
    ![Virtual Servers 01.JPG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Virtual Servers 01.JPG_thumb)
    ![Virtual Servers Status 01.JPG](/public/imported_attachments/1/Virtual Servers Status 01.JPG)
    ![Virtual Servers Status 01.JPG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Virtual Servers Status 01.JPG_thumb)

    ¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸© Poor Planning On Your Part Does Not Constitute An Emergency On My Part ©¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸
    ¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸© The trouble with life is there’s no background music ©¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸
    ¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸© Life isnt short, you're just dead for too long©¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • S
      SysIT
      last edited by Nov 25, 2013, 9:13 PM

      tried several different names / descriptions and seems anything using an Alias for the ports, gives me this issue.

      Is anyone using Alias's in ports with load balancing?

      ¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸© Poor Planning On Your Part Does Not Constitute An Emergency On My Part ©¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸
      ¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸© The trouble with life is there’s no background music ©¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸
      ¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸© Life isnt short, you're just dead for too long©¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        colbysilver
        last edited by Nov 19, 2014, 6:02 PM

        I know this is an old thread, but did you ever get a resolution?

        I just ran into this with 2.1.5-RELEASE (amd64).  I had both IP and Port aliases setup for the Virtual Servers and it would not work until I changed them to numeric entries.  Not a show-stopper but it would be convenient to use aliases in the Load Balancer.  It helps keep things consistent with the Firewall Rules and Outbound NAT setup.

        Thanks.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          SysIT
          last edited by Nov 19, 2014, 6:22 PM

          Unfortunately no, and even for me using single Ports the monitor just always shows the balancer as unknown status :(, tried numerous guides and set ups and none of them work for me on my 2.1 box so i just gave up on it.

          ¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸© Poor Planning On Your Part Does Not Constitute An Emergency On My Part ©¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸
          ¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸© The trouble with life is there’s no background music ©¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸
          ¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸© Life isnt short, you're just dead for too long©¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
            This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
            consent.not_received