Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Snort 2.9.5.5 pkg v3.0.1 Update – Minor bug fixes

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfSense Packages
    65 Posts 11 Posters 18.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • bmeeksB
      bmeeks
      last edited by

      @Supermule:

      The log in Snort on the alerts table has the problem even on 2.0.3.

      The widget doesnt.

      Fixing the sorting will take a little extra magic to handle the leading zero or one in the months.  Sorting as a plain string won't work.  I will see if I can make it smarter.

      Bill

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • bmeeksB
        bmeeks
        last edited by

        Fixing the sort turned out to be easier than I thought it would.  I fixed both the ALERTS tab display and the Snort Alerts Widget.  Let me test a wee bit more to be sure there are no unintended consequences from the fixes, then I will submit a Pull Request for a minor update to the Snort package and the Dashboard Alerts Widget.

        Bill

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          Supermule Banned
          last edited by

          When doing so Bill, cant you try to import the code from the traffic graph widgets since they have an interval function built in to update the Snort alert widget without refreshing the whole page…

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • bmeeksB
            bmeeks
            last edited by

            @Supermule:

            When doing so Bill, cant you try to import the code from the traffic graph widgets since they have an interval function built in to update the Snort alert widget without refreshing the whole page…

            Well, it's too late for this Widget fix.  Ermal merged the update this morning.  The current widget should be updating every 22 seconds if I understand the code correctly.  I think jimp originally wrote it.  His name is in the copyright info at the top of the source code.

            There also may be a problem with the older 2.0.3 pfSense code with respect to JavaScript callbacks for the active refresh.  Not sure, though.  I will test on my 2.1 install to see if it auto-refreshes the Snort Alerts frame.

            Bill

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • bmeeksB
              bmeeks
              last edited by

              @fragged:

              Snort Alerts list doesn't show entries from 1.1.2014 at the top. When clicking on the Date column to sort by date, the alerts from today show up at the top again. Bug or by design?

              This should be fixed in an update posted today (January 2, 2014).  The update was very minor and so I did not bump the package version number.  Hence no update will show in the Installed Packages tab.  Nonetheless, if you click the XML icon there to reinstall the package GUI components, you will get the updated PHP code for the Alerts tab.

              Bill

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                Supermule Banned
                last edited by

                It doesnt update automagically every 22 seconds Bill on 2.0.3.

                I havent got a 2.1 box yet hence all the issues :D

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • bmeeksB
                  bmeeks
                  last edited by

                  @Supermule:

                  It doesnt update automagically every 22 seconds Bill on 2.0.3.

                  I havent got a 2.1 box yet hence all the issues :D

                  I will test this out in my VMware environment to see if it works properly on 2.1.  If not, I will have to get up with jimp to see about a fix.

                  Bill

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    Supermule Banned
                    last edited by

                    Thumbs up mate!!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • F
                      fragged
                      last edited by

                      Thanks for the fix!

                      Edit:

                      For a future release, could you look into what Barnyard 2 spams to the system log? I love how Ermal (?) stripped the Snort log entries to bare minimal way back when, but Barnyard 2 still spams a good 100+ entries on Snort restart.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        jasonlitka
                        last edited by

                        I'm having a few issues with the 2.9.5.5 builds.

                        First, it seems that on the WAN interface, the "Kill States" option, when used in conjunction with "Both" for Which IP to Block, results in all WAN states being dumped any time something is blocked, even though the WAN IP is part of the default whitelist.

                        ~~Second, something is causing the firewall rules to reload fairly frequently as nothing stays in the Snort blocklist for more than 30 seconds (which results in issue #1 basically killing off my connection every minute or two) even though the setting is set to 1 hour.

                        Third, I just tried to disable the "Kill States" option and restart Snort and now it won't come back up.  The start button in the UI never turns green and each time I click it I get a new 'snort' process which burns an entire CPU core.  Turning Kill States back on doesn't remedy the issue.  The system logs show:

                        Jan 2 12:26:03	php: /snort/snort_interfaces.php: [Snort] Snort START for Verizon FIOS(igb3)…
                        Jan 2 12:26:01	php: /snort/snort_interfaces.php: [Snort] Building new sig-msg.map file for WAN…
                        Jan 2 12:26:00	php: /snort/snort_interfaces.php: [Snort] Enabling any flowbit-required rules for: WAN…
                        Jan 2 12:25:47	php: /snort/snort_interfaces.php: [Snort] Updating rules configuration for: WAN …
                        Jan 2 12:25:47	php: /snort/snort_interfaces.php: Toggle (snort starting) for WAN(Verizon FIOS)...
                        ```~~
                        
                        EDIT: Rebooted and the 2nd & 3rd issues went away.  Still have the first problems though.

                        I can break anything.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • bmeeksB
                          bmeeks
                          last edited by

                          @fragged:

                          Thanks for the fix!

                          Edit:

                          For a future release, could you look into what Barnyard 2 spams to the system log? I love how Ermal (?) stripped the Snort log entries to bare minimal way back when, but Barnyard 2 still spams a good 100+ entries on Snort restart.

                          Yeah, I will take a look at Barnyard2.  I hate the log spamming as well.  I've been waiting for the latest beta version to make it to production and get updated in Fresh Ports.  Supposedly the new beta can do a soft restart and re-read the configuration file similar to the way Snort does it.  That would mean you could update Barnyard2 settings without actually stopping and restarting the daemon.

                          Bill

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • bmeeksB
                            bmeeks
                            last edited by

                            @Jason:

                            I'm having a few issues with the 2.9.5.5 builds.

                            First, it seems that on the WAN interface, the "Kill States" option, when used in conjunction with "Both" for Which IP to Block, results in all WAN states being dumped any time something is blocked, even though the WAN IP is part of the default whitelist.

                            Are you sure this is isolated to just the 2.9.5.5 binary build?  I'm asking because nothing was changed in the blocking part of Snort with the new binary version.  That code has been static since at least 2.9.4.1 of the Snort binary.  I'm talking about the Spoink plugin that inserts IP addresses into the snort2c table in the pf engine.

                            Bill

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • D
                              DickB
                              last edited by

                              And if it is possible to make add a selection for the date format then that would make me very happy.
                              For me the MM/DD/YY format is very illogical. I prefer DD/MM/YY (or YY/MM/DD). Then I don't think it's 2 Feb. today  ;)
                              I know this may be confusing with the other logs, so maybe I should put in a request for a common pfSense selection for the date format.

                              Dick

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • J
                                jasonlitka
                                last edited by

                                @bmeeks:

                                @Jason:

                                I'm having a few issues with the 2.9.5.5 builds.

                                First, it seems that on the WAN interface, the "Kill States" option, when used in conjunction with "Both" for Which IP to Block, results in all WAN states being dumped any time something is blocked, even though the WAN IP is part of the default whitelist.

                                Are you sure this is isolated to just the 2.9.5.5 binary build?  I'm asking because nothing was changed in the blocking part of Snort with the new binary version.  That code has been static since at least 2.9.4.1 of the Snort binary.  I'm talking about the Spoink plugin that inserts IP addresses into the snort2c table in the pf engine.

                                Bill

                                No, I'm not sure about that.  I wasn't using it prior to 2.9.4.6 and on that build I wasn't using many rules.

                                I can break anything.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • bmeeksB
                                  bmeeks
                                  last edited by

                                  @Jason:

                                  @bmeeks:

                                  @Jason:

                                  I'm having a few issues with the 2.9.5.5 builds.

                                  First, it seems that on the WAN interface, the "Kill States" option, when used in conjunction with "Both" for Which IP to Block, results in all WAN states being dumped any time something is blocked, even though the WAN IP is part of the default whitelist.

                                  Are you sure this is isolated to just the 2.9.5.5 binary build?  I'm asking because nothing was changed in the blocking part of Snort with the new binary version.  That code has been static since at least 2.9.4.1 of the Snort binary.  I'm talking about the Spoink plugin that inserts IP addresses into the snort2c table in the pf engine.

                                  Bill

                                  No, I'm not sure about that.  I wasn't using it prior to 2.9.4.6 and on that build I wasn't using many rules.

                                  I will look through that Spoink plugin code again to see if anything jumps out.  I think Ermal made the last major updates to that quite some time back (maybe like two years or so, if I remember correctly).

                                  Bill

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • BBcan177B
                                    BBcan177 Moderator
                                    last edited by

                                    I have an issue with Snort when i click on the"x" remove alert in Snort WAN, it will remove the block (alert window at top showing removal) but the screen refresh brings me to the LAN alert screen? I am using Chrome. I have also tested this with IE with the same outcome?

                                    A suggestion for the new snort Update.

                                    In Status:System Logs:Firewall, there are two "!" One for resolving using the internal DNS servers, and the other DNSStuff.

                                    Would be nice to add the "!" Internal DNS button in snort also.

                                    "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                                    Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                                    Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                                    Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • bmeeksB
                                      bmeeks
                                      last edited by

                                      @BBcan17:

                                      I have an issue with Snort when i click on the"x" remove alert in Snort WAN, it will remove the block (alert window at top showing removal) but the screen refresh brings me to the LAN alert screen? I am using Chrome. I have also tested this with IE with the same outcome?

                                      This was an old bug that I slayed (or thought I did).  Might have "regressed some code by accident".  Let me see if I can reproduce.  If the bug is back, I will fix it in the next update that is in the works.

                                      @BBcan17:

                                      A suggestion for the new snort Update.

                                      In Status:System Logs:Firewall, there are two "!" One for resolving using the internal DNS servers, and the other DNSStuff.

                                      Would be nice to add the "!" Internal DNS button in snort also.

                                      I will look into doing this.  I sort of didn't really like the way the current code takes you away from the window anyway.  Having a smaller pop-up window would be handier, and then the other link for more details.

                                      Bill

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • BBcan177B
                                        BBcan177 Moderator
                                        last edited by

                                        Thanks Bill.

                                        I agree having a smaller popup window for dnsstuff would be great.

                                        Another suggestion would be to have a link to disable the rule from the alert screen. Currently you can only suppress or clear the block?

                                        Keep up the great work.

                                        "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                                        Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                                        Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                                        Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • BBcan177B
                                          BBcan177 Moderator
                                          last edited by

                                          @bmeeks:

                                          I sort of didn't really like the way the current code takes you away from the window anyway.  Having a smaller pop-up window would be handier, and then the other link for more details.

                                          I notice that the "popup window" for the local DNS lookup doesn't allow any of the data to be selected and copied. Is there a way around that?

                                          "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                                          Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                                          Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                                          Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • bmeeksB
                                            bmeeks
                                            last edited by

                                            @BBcan17:

                                            @bmeeks:

                                            I sort of didn't really like the way the current code takes you away from the window anyway.  Having a smaller pop-up window would be handier, and then the other link for more details.

                                            I notice that the "popup window" for the local DNS lookup doesn't allow any of the data to be selected and copied. Is there a way around that?

                                            Not sure.  I have not looked at the firewall log code where the window comes from, but it looks like a pretty simple JavaScript pop-up.

                                            Bill

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.