Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PfSense vs Draytek Vigor 3300V

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    6 Posts 3 Posters 5.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T
      teleweb
      last edited by

      How does pfSense compare to a multi-WAN router like the Draytek Vigor3300V ?

      The Vigor 3300V has load balancing for 4 WAN ports, IPsec, etc… and the VoIP options are a nice bonus.

      But what about features?
      Are there important things that pfSense has but the 3300V doesn't?
      (or the other way around)

      My main interests are:

      1. Best possible QoS for VoIP-over-IP telephony
      2. Load balancing / Failover for 4 WAN links (1 cable + 3 DSL)
      3. Redundant setup with 2 routers
      4. IPSec Connection to a bunch of Windows 2003/2008 servers hosted at a remote site

      Thanks!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • GruensFroeschliG
        GruensFroeschli
        last edited by

        Why dont you take a look at the feature list and compare them?

        You could post the differences/advantages here.

        We do what we must, because we can.

        Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T
          teleweb
          last edited by

          I just updated my message to list the most important things that I'm looking for.
          Just by looking at the feature list they both look good, so I am looking for some advice from people who have experience with these features or possibly with the Draytek device itself…

          Thanks again.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            mrsense
            last edited by

            If they both look good pick the cheaper one…
            Seriously though pfsense is work in progress and some features work better than other so I recommend you try and see for yourself if it fits your needs.  Regarding your inquiry, IIRC, pfsense will not do QOS and load balance at the same time.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              teleweb
              last edited by

              Can anybody please confirm whether it is indeed impossible to combine QoS and load balancing with pfSense?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • GruensFroeschliG
                GruensFroeschli
                last edited by

                Really. Read the forum.
                There are lot's of posts about this one. (no it's not possible)

                We do what we must, because we can.

                Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.