• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

[resolved] pfSense not routing between connected subnets

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Routing and Multi WAN
24 Posts 6 Posters 63.0k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B
    b3nno
    last edited by Mar 11, 2014, 1:17 PM Mar 11, 2014, 1:12 PM

    My WAN network lies in 10.0.0.0/24. I have tried to replace the davicom PCI card with realtek PCI 100/10 NIC. Still no routing happening. LAN and DMZ is configured on the onboard NICs. I did try to use the third PCI for LAN, still no routing. Realtek 100/10 PCI card is using RL driver. Onboard Realtek NICs is using RE driver.

    Attached screens from LAN and DMZ int config page.

    DMZINT.png
    DMZINT.png_thumb
    LANINT.png
    LANINT.png_thumb

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • P
      podilarius
      last edited by Mar 11, 2014, 3:22 PM

      With that setup and the correct rules, it should route without issue. Did you say that if you disable the firewall in advanced, it still will not route?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • B
        b3nno
        last edited by Mar 12, 2014, 9:56 AM Mar 12, 2014, 9:46 AM

        That is correct. It will not route between connected subnets even with firewall disabled.

        I will try routing between nets on different vlans in a trunk from the pfsense box later today. If the NICs support vlan/trunking at all :)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B
          b3nno
          last edited by Mar 12, 2014, 10:36 PM

          Breaking news!

          The error of my ways has revealed it self. Windows firewall blocks both icmp and IP traffic from an other subnet than that the host resides in. All this time the poor pfSense box was doing its job probably perfectly.

          Sorry for wasting your time people, but thanks a bunch for your posts :) really appreciate it.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • P
            podilarius
            last edited by Mar 13, 2014, 3:33 AM

            Good old Windows … At least they are error on somewhat safe now. Good luck.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B
              b3nno
              last edited by Mar 13, 2014, 7:05 AM

              Hehe yeah. Both hosts were running Win 8 so maybe its something new. I have not heard of this atleast. I figured it out when I put a cisco switch in to the mix, which I could ping from all subnets.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B
                Brutal
                last edited by Mar 13, 2014, 11:58 PM

                I've been caught by this in the past and now packet capture on each port to see exactly what's going on.  Sure saves a lot of time.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  madVaX
                  last edited by Jul 3, 2014, 11:56 PM

                  I have an almost identical setup with almost identical issues.

                  One pfSense box (PC Engines APU 1C4, three Realtek RTL8111E NICs), re0 is the WAN interface, connecting to a cable modem which connects to a public IP network of the Internet provider, re1 is the LAN interface connecting a bunch of machines in the 192.168.0.0/24 private subnet and re2 is the OPT1 interface connecting some machine in the 192.168.1.0/24 private subnet.

                  WAN has filter private and bogons enabled, those settings as well as the upstream route are off for both the LAN and OPT1 configured subnets.

                  Routing to the Internet works on both subnets, all hosts get their IP from DHCP on their respective interface.

                  There are any-to-any rules for both local subnetworks configured (OPT1 basically with the LAN rules as template, replacing the relevant interface names).

                  I have a NAT rule, which allows access from the internet on port 443 to one server on the ~0.0/24 network. I also had NAT reflection enabled ("NAT + proxy") for this NAT rule. The default behaviour is "Disable". This works.

                  I run Linux boxes, mostly Ubuntu and small SOHO Access Points (Sitecom) on both LANs, but as the original poster, I am unable to ping machines in the ~1.0/24 from the ~0.0/24 subnet and vice versa.

                  I tried pinging with Ubuntu UFW personal firewall disabled on the client towards the AP in the other subnet, and it does not work.

                  As with the OP, I can ping the other interface (~1.1/24 from ~0.1/24 and vice versa) but not the machines in the other subnet.

                  Adding a firewall rule to monitor traffic shows, that packet are passed. Packet capture shows, that nothing comes back if I send pings.

                  I simply don't understand this (must be a stupid oversight probably an issue with the machine config of the AP I used for testing so far).

                  If anyone could help here, I would be very gratefull.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M
                    madVaX
                    last edited by Jul 6, 2014, 5:33 PM

                    Reply to self:

                    Similar issue as the original poster. The Access Points I used as ping targets are configured not to reply to pings from other subnets. Packets where passed around with no problem by pfSense.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P
                      podilarius
                      last edited by Jul 7, 2014, 2:07 PM

                      This is the main problem that I see as well. The access points don't allow the ping reply. Please test with something else, like s real computer.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                        This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                        consent.not_received