Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Packages wishlist?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfSense Packages
    661 Posts 384 Posters 1.5m Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • L
      logdog
      last edited by

      Is there anyway to bring back MailScanner for 2.3.*?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        maus
        last edited by

        These packages are already available in FreeBSD,so there shouldn't be too much trouble porting into pfSense. Any work helping to create a free Internet will be much appreciated.

        1. shadowsocks-libev ,under GNU General Public License
        Intro

        Shadowsocks-libev is a lightweight secured SOCKS5 proxy for embedded devices and low-end boxes.
        It is a port of Shadowsocks created by @clowwindy, and maintained by @madeye and @linusyang.
        Current version: 3.0.2 | Changelog

        2. kcptun ,under MIT License

        Shadowsocks provides proxy,and Kcptun deals with packet loss.Ipset will also be needed to specify if a certain domain should go proxy or connect directly.The DNS query should go proxy as well to anti DNS pollution.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          A Former User
          last edited by

          @borkov:

          Would love to have DNSCrypt.

          Thanks!!!!!

          would really like to see this as a package in pfsense, as well.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • marcellocM
            marcelloc
            last edited by

            @tdhuck:

            @borkov:

            Would love to have DNSCrypt.

            Thanks!!!!!

            would really like to see this as a package in pfsense, as well.

            according to documentation, the native unbound dns service used on pfSense can be complied with DNSCrypt

            https://dnscrypt.org/#dnscrypt-server

            
            Running your own DNSCrypt server
            
            .
            .
            .
            unbound, a validating, recursive, and caching DNS resolver, can also act as a DNSCrypt server when compiled with --enable-dnscrypt.
            
            Refer to DNSCrypt Options section in unbound.conf(5) for configuration options.
            
            Deployment
            
            

            Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

            Help a community developer! ;D

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              A Former User
              last edited by

              @marcelloc:

              @tdhuck:

              @borkov:

              Would love to have DNSCrypt.

              Thanks!!!!!

              would really like to see this as a package in pfsense, as well.

              according to documentation, the native unbound dns service used on pfSense can be complied with DNSCrypt

              https://dnscrypt.org/#dnscrypt-server

              
              Running your own DNSCrypt server
              
              .
              .
              .
              unbound, a validating, recursive, and caching DNS resolver, can also act as a DNSCrypt server when compiled with --enable-dnscrypt.
              
              Refer to DNSCrypt Options section in unbound.conf(5) for configuration options.
              
              Deployment
              
              

              i was looking for a package that could be enabled in the GUI, i have no idea how to implement using the instructions you posted (i found that information, yesterday, while looking at their site).

              thank you for sharing.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • marcellocM
                marcelloc
                last edited by

                @tdhuck:

                I was looking for a package that could be enabled in the GUI, i have no idea how to implement using the instructions you posted (i found that information, yesterday, while looking at their site).

                thank you for sharing.

                The first step is to compile and create unbound package with this feature on a Freebsd 10.3 to replace on you pfSense 2.3.3 testing machine.

                If the works, the next steps are findind the best way to run it(as a proxy + sever, just a proxy, just a server, etc…) and then create gui files that configure these extra steps, blacklist downloads, acls, etc....

                not that easy but not impossible too.

                EDIT: looks like de unbound source does not have the dnscrypt embedded but the wrapper looks like 'simple' to include
                https://github.com/Cofyc/dnscrypt-wrapper/

                Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                Help a community developer! ;D

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  MarcoP
                  last edited by

                  Hi,

                  as for arpwatch, is it just a matter of converting current HTML/CSS to Boostrap?

                  cheers

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    swmspam
                    last edited by

                    @borkov:

                    Would love to have DNSCrypt.

                    Thanks!!!!!

                    +1 for DNScrypt as an installable under the GUI package manager with a services tab and entry on the services monitoring dashboard window.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Z
                      zentex
                      last edited by

                      The Xymon client would be nice for monitoring of pfsense. I see posts going back 5 years on the forums but no "official package" has ever been added.

                      I went looking today, and I see zabbix is now in the packages, but still no xymon  :'(

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • R
                        RadOD
                        last edited by

                        Something along the lines of smokeping for ISP quality monitoring.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • dennypageD
                          dennypage
                          last edited by

                          @RadOD:

                          Something along the lines of smokeping for ISP quality monitoring.

                          The Quality Graph, which offers much the same information as smoke ping, can be found in Status / Monitoring.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • R
                            RadOD
                            last edited by

                            @dennypage:

                            @RadOD:

                            Something along the lines of smokeping for ISP quality monitoring.

                            The Quality Graph, which offers much the same information as smoke ping, can be found in Status / Monitoring.

                            Huh, I never realized it could be configured.  I thought it was just for CPU.

                            Still, I like to monitor specific IP addresses such as my ISP gateway and VPN targets and compare to generic websites to find problems early.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • V
                              vagnyj
                              last edited by

                              Hello everyone, is there an opportunity to install package Virtual Box ? With web management as implemented in Nas4free.  In the photo example of management virtual box on Nas4free

                              111.jpg
                              111.jpg_thumb
                              12.jpg
                              12.jpg_thumb

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • jahonixJ
                                jahonix
                                last edited by

                                @vagnyj:

                                Virtual Box

                                No.
                                This is your firewall, not a hypervisor.
                                However, you can install a virtual pfSense on a hypervisor.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M
                                  msanangelo
                                  last edited by

                                  @hongkonger:

                                  Would really love an implementation of either of the following

                                  • Freenas
                                  • Bacula Server
                                  • Simple FTP server for file storage
                                  • Samba (with UI)

                                  Most of the above are already available in some adhoc way on pfsense (except bacula server and Freenas) , but really appreciate a UI based installation and management.

                                  thanks

                                  I second this. A FTP Server and Samba in particular. If a store bought consumer router can do it, why not pfsense? Surely it can do it better, more secure, and faster. :)

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • jahonixJ
                                    jahonix
                                    last edited by

                                    @msanangelo:

                                    If a store bought consumer router can do it, why not pfsense?

                                    Maybe because pfSense is a more serious contender in the firewall business and not one of the flaky consumer routers you better throw as far as your aching back lets you?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • BBcan177B
                                      BBcan177 Moderator
                                      last edited by

                                      @jahonix:

                                      @msanangelo:

                                      If a store bought consumer router can do it, why not pfsense?

                                      Maybe because pfSense is a more serious contender in the firewall business and not one of the flaky consumer routers you better throw as far as your aching back lets you?

                                      http://thehackernews.com/2017/05/samba-rce-exploit.html
                                      https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-announce/2017/000406.html
                                      https://www.shodan.io/report/FoqqpNmw

                                      "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                                      Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                                      Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                                      Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M
                                        msanangelo
                                        last edited by

                                        @jahonix:

                                        @msanangelo:

                                        If a store bought consumer router can do it, why not pfsense?

                                        Maybe because pfSense is a more serious contender in the firewall business and not one of the flaky consumer routers you better throw as far as your aching back lets you?

                                        Really? it's been a stellar firewall so far. it will more than happily block things but I have to fight it to allow things. can't even forward port 80 that worked fine on the tp-link it replaced and also worked on a VM behind the main pfsense router. the data usage stats are practically useless without an added package. So far, ddwrt worked better and wasn't so annoying. I might enjoy pfsense more if it wasn't so featureless. All I'm asking is a couple programs to make it a bit more useful on the LAN side. Also, is it too much to ask for some critical software patches around here? I've got 4 vulnerable packages in 2.3.3 and my only hope is to wait for 2.4. whenever that'll be released.  >.>

                                        @BBcan177:

                                        http://thehackernews.com/2017/05/samba-rce-exploit.html
                                        https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-announce/2017/000406.html
                                        https://www.shodan.io/report/FoqqpNmw

                                        I'm aware of that. I'm not dumb enough to put samba or ftp on the wan. I just want it for the lan.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • marcellocM
                                          marcelloc
                                          last edited by

                                          @msanangelo:

                                          is it too much to ask for some critical software patches around here?

                                          If you need the feature and know how to configure it under console/config files, you can enable freebsd repo and install the packages you need.

                                          Also, pfSense has a great GUI framework that you can use to create your own packages with xml files and php script to check selected options and create config files.

                                          What packages from 2.3.3 are vulnerable?

                                          Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                          Help a community developer! ;D

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • dennypageD
                                            dennypage
                                            last edited by

                                            @msanangelo:

                                            Also, is it too much to ask for some critical software patches around here? I've got 4 vulnerable packages in 2.3.3 and my only hope is to wait for 2.4.

                                            What packages? And is there a reason that you haven't installed the 2.3.4 update?

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.