Navigation

    Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search

    Acpi_perf0: Px transition to 3000 failed

    Hardware
    2
    5
    1006
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • O
      openletter last edited by

      I've installed pfSense to a HDD and after running a little while (including after reboot), I get the following error:

      acpi_perf0: Px transition to 3000 failed
      acpi_perf0: set freq failed, err 6
      

      This error displays on the monitor every minute or so.

      I've done some googling and found various ways to address this, but vastly different methods are being used to "make the error go away," and I'm not entirely sure the condition causing the error gets fixed or the process of logging the error is removed.

      This is on a board with a P4 631 3.0 GHz. I've had issues in Ubuntu with the board's BIOS not loading the correct microcode and causing an associated entry in syslog telling me such, but I am able to fix this by installing the intel-microcode package.

      Anyway, if someone can at least point me in a direction, that would be great.

      I should add that I'm pretty much completely unfamiliar with FreeBSD.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • O
        openletter last edited by

        More info:

        $ dmesg | grep -i cpu
        CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz (2992.59-MHz K8-class CPU)
        FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
         cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  0
         cpu1 (AP/HT): APIC ID:  1
        cpu0: <acpi cpu=""> on acpi0
        cpu1: <acpi cpu=""> on acpi0
        acpi_perf0: <acpi cpu="" frequency="" control=""> on cpu0
        p4tcc0: <cpu frequency="" thermal="" control=""> on cpu0
        est1: <enhanced speedstep="" frequency="" control=""> on cpu1
        est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized.
        est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr f2700000f27
        p4tcc1: <cpu frequency="" thermal="" control=""> on cpu1
        SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!</cpu></enhanced></cpu></acpi></acpi></acpi>
        
        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • O
          openletter last edited by

          In a post at the FreeBSD forums, I found a possible solution for updating microcode, but the solution requires:

          On FreeBSD 8.0 or later:

          # cd /usr/ports/sysutils/devcpu-data
          # make install clean
          

          But pfSense does not have /usr/ports/ directory.

          The solution also states to set microcode_update_enable="YES" in rc.conf, but pfSense uses config.xml, so I'm not sure if this would work just as well, nor am I sure where to put it.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator last edited by

            There are no build tools in pfSense for good reason so ports wouldn't be much use anyway. However you can use the FreeBSD package system to install this. I have no idea what it's dependencies might be though, you could potentially end up installing something that breaks pfSense.

            Steve

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • O
              openletter last edited by

              Thanks for the info. Basically, my processor is running at 3.0 GHz and isn't using any kind of speed stepping. However, I'm rather liking pfSense, though it took some time to get rules figured out - still having some minor issues, so I'm treating the P4 build as just a test platform. I'll probably get an Atom board to be the permanent home.

              Thanks for the hard work on this project. I've been using DD-WRT almost since it came out, but support for their community versions really went downhill when they began offering professional services, leading me to question how secure the builds are, plus I find the community to be rude and arrogant.

              I'm also hoping that pf will do a better job at QoS for VoIP than iptables, that way I don't have to use vendor supplied, rarely if ever upgraded, hardware for my network gateway, which in other configurations doesn't seem to play well with streaming video.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post

              Products

              • Platform Overview
              • TNSR
              • pfSense
              • Appliances

              Services

              • Training
              • Professional Services

              Support

              • Subscription Plans
              • Contact Support
              • Product Lifecycle
              • Documentation

              News

              • Media Coverage
              • Press
              • Events

              Resources

              • Blog
              • FAQ
              • Find a Partner
              • Resource Library
              • Security Information

              Company

              • About Us
              • Careers
              • Partners
              • Contact Us
              • Legal
              Our Mission

              We provide leading-edge network security at a fair price - regardless of organizational size or network sophistication. We believe that an open-source security model offers disruptive pricing along with the agility required to quickly address emerging threats.

              Subscribe to our Newsletter

              Product information, software announcements, and special offers. See our newsletter archive to sign up for future newsletters and to read past announcements.

              © 2021 Rubicon Communications, LLC | Privacy Policy