Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    UPnP Vulnerability

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off-Topic & Non-Support Discussion
    4 Posts 2 Posters 3.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      jaything
      last edited by

      Hi, following the news of the recent flash based hack of UPnP is the pfSense implementation vulnerable to this level of manipultion?

      the hack was published here http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Cry HavokC
        Cry Havok
        last edited by

        Two things to note about that article:

        1. It requires you to be able to guess the IP of the router (which, for most people admittedly will be 192.168.0.1 or 192.168.1.1)
        2. You have to write a UPnP request that's specific to the router being targetted

        Oh, and ultimately it is simply about using UPnP the way it was designed to be used :)  The best solution is to ensure you don't run embedded media such as flash etc - if you're using FireFox try NoScript.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          jaything
          last edited by

          I was aware of the port forwarding features of UPnP but not of its ability to change DNS servers etc, port redirection isnt much of a concern to me, but DNS alterations are, is there any way to disable this part of UPnP or prevent pfSense DNS Server entries from being altered by it?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Cry HavokC
            Cry Havok
            last edited by

            I'm not sure if pfSense's UPnP implementation supports that, however go re-read my previous post - if you're not using trivially guessable IPs for your pfSense host and the exploit doesn't target pfSense explicitly then you're probably ok.

            The following thread may eventually contain some of the answers: http://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=433

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.