Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    VK-T40E on gbps wan

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    7 Posts 6 Posters 1.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T
      tfh
      last edited by

      Hi,

      I currently run m0n0wall on ALIX (my Liantec box with pfsense died and doesn't want to boot anymore).
      An upgrade is sorely needed.

      I live in Tokyo where Gbps WAN are a distinct possibility ( 2 ISPs offer 1gbps and Sonet just came in with 2gbps wan) I would like to know what would be the throughput of VK-T40E for basic routing (no snort, just firewall and routing) .

      Will it accommodate a 2gbps wan ?

      Thanks
      Quentin

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • W
        Wolf666
        last edited by

        From https://www.pfsense.org/hardware/ :

        501+ Mbps
        Server class hardware with PCI-e network adapters. Multiple cores at > 2.0GHz are required.

        Modem Draytek Vigor 130
        pfSense 2.4 Supermicro A1SRi-2558 - 8GB ECC RAM - Intel S3500 SSD 80GB - M350 Case
        Switch Cisco SG350-10
        AP Netgear R7000 (Stock FW)
        HTPC Intel NUC5i3RYH
        NAS Synology DS1515+
        NAS Synology DS213+

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • F
          filnko
          last edited by

          VK-T40E/APU only manages around 450mbit of basic routing and firewalling.
          You could go for the C2558/C2758, there should be no problems with throughout.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Yep the Rangely boxes are certainly suitable. The hardware sizing guidelines are somewhat out of date. Even a relatively modest CPU will push >1Gbps of firewall/NAT traffic these days. The, now older, Celeron G530 has been shown to be capable for example.

            Steve

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              kcmichaelm
              last edited by

              Apologies for bumping, but this is the exact issue I have just run into. I have a VK-T40E (w/SSD) that I purchased last year. I just moved to an area with Gigabit FTTH, and I was confused to see the ISP's modem pulling 750/500, but my VK-T40E could only get 300/200.

              I used to use a lot of heavily filtering (snort, etc) - so I did a config reset, to where the only change I made to a default config was to enter the pppoe credentials. There was no improvement.

              I see the post above where, at some time, the store told us this box was only good for 450 Mbps total (which I'm not close to really) - but I studied this purchase for a week and never saw that.

              Am I just SOL? I thought I was purchasing a decent bit of kit, I didn't realize it was so underpowered. Normally I run DD-WRT on whatever I can find; this was my first big purchase to what I thought was a great appliance.

              Thanks for any comments you can give.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ?
                Guest
                last edited by

                Apologies for bumping, but this is the exact issue I have just run into. I have a VK-T40E (w/SSD) that I purchased last year. I just moved to an area with Gigabit FTTH, and I was confused to see the ISP's modem pulling 750/500, but my VK-T40E could only get 300/200.

                And if you now buy another box for your pfSense and then the ISP is offering 2 GBit/s or 3 GBit/s this box
                would then also once more again outdated, this game can be easily made thousands of times and you
                will loose every time again. But why now should be the pfSense store the guilty one?

                P.S.
                Without activated PowerD (high adaptive) measured with iPerf from PC to PC something around
                or nearly ~450 MBit/s is a really good number, but with activated PowerD (high adaptive) it
                was pending something between ~650 MBit/s till ~750 MBit/s owed to the file size.  So this
                would perhaps be a good point to start to tune your box a little bit.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  About the only option you have to seriously increase the throughput on the APU is to fit Intel miniPCIe NICs. I've not tried that myself (or even seen it) but one user here reported ~600Mbps. Of course his testing may have have different to yours. They aren't that cheap though and require modifying the case or re-casing etc.
                  300Mbps does seem low, I've seen reports of 350-450Mbps in real world conditions. Again the testing methods could have been very different.

                  Steve

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.