Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    LAN GUI not accessible!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    46 Posts 4 Posters 12.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      This is getting complex! Not helped by the fact that I have sent a few PMs with ForensicGeek so that info isn't available here.  ::) Let's keep things public.

      The fact that the gateway is showing as down is not good and probably explains why routing is not happening. The gateway status is monitored by pfSense pinging the gateway address so it implies either the gateway is not responding to pings or it can't reply for some reason like a bad route. What is the gateway address? I assume it's a machine on your Uni network. If it's running IDS/IPS it may have objected to the constant pings and stopped replying.

      A few things are unclear to me reading back through the thread. So for the sake of clarity:
      You are using a single physical host machine and pfSense (and others) exist as VMs running in VirtualBox, yes? You seem to have used the term 'virtual box' where I would expect to see 'virtual machine' which is confusing (to me  ;)).
      I'm not sure where or how you are testing that things are 'working'. Are you testing from a VM behind pfSense?

      I have only used virtual box a few times but on each of those occasions the thing that tripped me up was assigning the correct network adapter type for host communication. As I recall the nomenclature used did not make it obvious and the docs were also unclear.

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        kejianshi
        last edited by

        Unless I misunderstood, its working for him now.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          Yes but I fail to see how adding a DNS entry to one of the VMs will have fixed the pfSense gateway issue. Also 192.168.1.1 should have worked as a DNS server for that VM anyway, unless the WAN gateway is not a DNS server. In which case what is it providing for DNS via DHCP on the WAN?
          I agree that there seems to be something more here. We shall see.  ;)

          P.S. W00t! 10K posts.  ;D

          Steve

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            phil.davis
            last edited by

            [[quote]P.S. W00t! 10K posts.  ;D
            So are you trying to post all over just to catch JimP?

            As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
            If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              kejianshi
              last edited by

              Do your fingers hurt?  ;D

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Just kind of happened.  ;)

                Steve

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.