Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Load Balancing Questions

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Routing and Multi WAN
    3 Posts 2 Posters 897 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • arrmoA
      arrmo
      last edited by

      Hi,

      First of all - I have my Load Balancing setup working, it works quite well in fact (very happy with it … :)). But a couple questions,

      • why can I not enter a hostname, and rather have to hard-code and IP address (for the load balancing servers)? It would be handy to use the hostname, that's all.
      • Is there also a reason why I can't just say "WAN" in the Virtual Server (instead of entering an IP address for a DHCP interface)?

      Thanks!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jimpJ
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
        last edited by

        @arrmo:

        • why can I not enter a hostname, and rather have to hard-code and IP address (for the load balancing servers)? It would be handy to use the hostname, that's all.

        Using hostnames there would increase the complexity a bit. It would rely on DNS being functional for the LB daemon rules to work, and it likely would not pick up changes while running. I'm not sure relayd supports using a hostname in its config in those places either. It might, but if it doesn't, then that would be an even larger hurdle.

        @arrmo:

        • Is there also a reason why I can't just say "WAN" in the Virtual Server (instead of entering an IP address for a DHCP interface)?

        Most likely, it was because whoever coded the GUI used a simple text field to make the entry rather than a drop-down or combo box.

        If you need something fancier than what the GUI provides, then HAproxy or a similar package may be more your speed. Though I'm not sure it supports either of those items either, it is much more flexible than the built-in load balancing daemon.

        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • arrmoA
          arrmo
          last edited by

          Makes sense - thanks for the info!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.