Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    FTP broken again after update to 2.2-RC

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.2 Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    26 Posts 10 Posters 11.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      daniel.cabral
      last edited by

      Well…in my case, for now i've returned to 2.1.5. Ftp connectvity is importante here, our legacy ERP uses standard ftp to update itself...if you're thinking about +- 50 workstations...

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • marcellocM
        marcelloc
        last edited by

        from https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4210
        "…not something we're looking into for 2.2 at this point.."

        Does it means that 2.2 will be released with ftp proxy broken?  :o

        Can somebody test jftpgw or frox port via pkg add to see if it's an workaround until native ftp proxy get fixed?

        Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

        Help a community developer! ;D

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          cmb
          last edited by

          2.2 has no FTP proxy and will be released without one. It only helped with active mode clients behind NAT anyway, and only with a simple single public IP setup. Passive mode clients, what essentially everything does by default in recent years (minus the Windows command line FTP client) doesn't need a proxy. Servers can be configured easily in a means that doesn't require a proxy. You have to do so with FTPS anyway, which is the only FTP anything you should be using at this point.

          Time to move on from FTP, folks.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • johnpozJ
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
            last edited by

            @cmb:

            Time to move on from FTP, folks.

            Exactly!!!! ;)

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • marcellocM
              marcelloc
              last edited by

              Thanks Chris.  I do not recomend ftp also, but you know that many sites still use it. :)

              Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

              Help a community developer! ;D

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • johnpozJ
                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                last edited by

                To the sites that still use it – you would hope atleast it was ftps, which breaks the helper anyway.  The helper is need it 2 setups.. Where your wanting your client behind pfsense to use a active connection to public server.  Or your running server behind pfsense and you want to allow passive clients.

                If client use passive no helper needed, if your running server you would hope you were running ftps anyway which would of required the manual firewall rules anyway because helper could not see the traffic to fix up.  So I don't really see this as  loss of anything of real function..  And you really shouldn't be using ftp anyway ;)

                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.