Navigation

    Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search

    State of [u3g] & [cdce]

    Off-Topic & Non-Support Discussion
    1
    4
    635
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ?
      Guest last edited by

      Hello pfSense Guru's

      I would like to discuss u3g and cdce and 4G in general.

      I saw this redmine post. Mr. Jim Thompson moved a related issue up to 2.2.1
      https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/3640

      Then i found this and wonder…..
      https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192345

      The redmine bug report looks so poorly written i don't know how they would know what to fix. Plus i have working examples of said hardware working. I bet this is more a hardware issue truthfully. I can send a working example to any pfSense developer who asks. Especially Jim Thompson who is at least aware there are issues and lacks the hardware.. Does pfSense have any testing facilities where i could send hardware or is this more upstream-freebsd?

      The real true issue is most all 4G internal mini PCI-E modems are cdce type devices now and the guy working on it at the freebsd level is walking away from it?? Can't be good. I don't want to gossip but what is the true state of 4G in FreeBSD and by extension pfSense. Is there people working the issue?  And just to be clear, pfSense added cell support around 2010 after a bounty was issued. Do i have that right?
      Thanks Frank

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        Guest last edited by

        I won't be able to work on this. I am not happy with the fact that CDCE related code ends up in the U3G driver, but I can't justify blocking this either.

        I'll leave the decision the HPS.

        What is the HPS he alludes to?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          Guest last edited by

          And i did'nt mention QMI which from what i read in Linux world, is a binary blob in a wrapper, so i assume freebsd would never use that -is that correct?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ?
            Guest last edited by

            This is one of the most informative pages i have ever seen regarding this matter.

            http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/3G_/_3.5G

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post

            Products

            • Platform Overview
            • TNSR
            • pfSense
            • Appliances

            Services

            • Training
            • Professional Services

            Support

            • Subscription Plans
            • Contact Support
            • Product Lifecycle
            • Documentation

            News

            • Media Coverage
            • Press
            • Events

            Resources

            • Blog
            • FAQ
            • Find a Partner
            • Resource Library
            • Security Information

            Company

            • About Us
            • Careers
            • Partners
            • Contact Us
            • Legal
            Our Mission

            We provide leading-edge network security at a fair price - regardless of organizational size or network sophistication. We believe that an open-source security model offers disruptive pricing along with the agility required to quickly address emerging threats.

            Subscribe to our Newsletter

            Product information, software announcements, and special offers. See our newsletter archive to sign up for future newsletters and to read past announcements.

            © 2021 Rubicon Communications, LLC | Privacy Policy