Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Infiniband cards with pfSense 2.2

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    23 Posts 5 Posters 6.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R Offline
      RobertFontaine
      last edited by

      … Thread Resurrection...

      I'm building a home lab and looking at QDR infiniband within my rack and ethernet coming in from the outside (wan/lan)

      I have the occassional need for very high bandwidth between my storage and my compute nodes.

      Am I correct in understanding that pfSense can be compiled with IP over IB and can include a subnet manager?
      Can pfSense concurrently route RDMA and IP over IB?  Does this question even make sense?

      Would I be better off with a point to point connection between my storage node(s)/san and my compute nodes and/or adding a 4036 (4036E has a 10gb ethernet and subnet manager onboard but I'm poor) switch and effectively running both gigabit ethernet for ip traffic and QDR infiniband for NFS over RDMA?

      Thanks,
      Robert.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ? This user is from outside of this forum
        Guest
        last edited by

        Hello,

        in normal Infiniband is used to build separate SAN networks that are connected over Infiniband NICs
        that are attached to Infiniband switches to deliver around ~10 GBit/s or 40 GBit/s or 56 GBit/s or
        attached directly from card to card. And this extra or separate network will be then connected to
        the rest entire network over 10 or 40 GBit/s in usual. So why pfSense as a firewall should be
        invited in this game? And why for so much money? A normal Mellanox SRx3 VPI card is able
        to get for the cost of ~1300 € (dual Port NIC) and a switch for around ~6500 € and then this
        construct will be able to delivers 56 GBit/s at each port! But there is no need of the firewall or
        a separate router that is doing anything in this "game".

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R Offline
          RobertFontaine
          last edited by

          @BlueKobold:

          Hello,

          in normal Infiniband is used to build separate SAN networks that are connected over Infiniband NICs
          that are attached to Infiniband switches to deliver around ~10 GBit/s or 40 GBit/s or 56 GBit/s or
          attached directly from card to card. And this extra or separate network will be then connected to
          the rest entire network over 10 or 40 GBit/s in usual. So why pfSense as a firewall should be
          invited in this game? And why for so much money? A normal Mellanox SRx3 VPI card is able
          to get for the cost of ~1300 € (dual Port NIC) and a switch for around ~6500 € and then this
          construct will be able to delivers 56 GBit/s at each port! But there is no need of the firewall or
          a separate router that is doing anything in this "game".

          I am building a small compute network (single rack) 
          Kvm/Centos / dual  xeon  / 4 xeon phi -    compute nodes
          Kvm/Solaris / zfs  mirrored / striped ssds -  data server (San -  napp-it)

          Remote VPN
          Development VMs
          LAMP,  misc servers smtp, ftp, etc…

          Qdr infiniband -  cheap,  high bandwidth,  low latency
          Ib/nfs/rdma

          If pfsense can support ipoib and bridge wan to lan
          then I don't have to buy a bridging switch in the short term.  I  will likely vm pfsense as well.

          A Voltaire 4036 is relatively  inexpensive.

          This is being done as a home basement  project,  low budget,  incremental build out....  Data mining,  machine learning,  parallel programming,  networking lab/sandbox, kaggle contests

          Matlab,  pysci,  R, OpenMP,  openacc,  c++,  Fortran,  etc.

          a few remote developers,  analysts,  VPN / ssh.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.