Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Network Cards for my Pfsense Server

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    6 Posts 5 Posters 3.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F
      Fabzster
      last edited by

      Hi

      I keep getting a  "Watchdog time out " ,"Prefetch unit stuck " , "no memory for Rx buffers " error where the pfsense server loses all Internet connectivity, perhaps when a lot of data goes through it. I then have to reboot the server to correct it.

      I was reading up and many people recommend the Intel Cards, but after more research I see many people have issues with those cards as well.

      Could anyone recommend specific intel cards for me?

      I have access to the following (Which of the following are good?)

      • Intel expi9301CT Oem pack , pci-Express (1x) gigabit lan desktop adapter, 10/100/1000mbps , Intel 82574L chipset - includes extra low-profile only for 2U rackmount or slim desktop

      • Intel i210T1 Oem pack , pci-Express (1x) gigabit lan desktop adapter, 10/100/1000mbps , Intel i210 chipset , support IEEE 802.1Qav Audio-Video-Bridging (AVB ) - includes extra low-profile only for 2U rackmount or slim desktop

      • Intel i350T2 , pci-Express (4x) Dual-port gigabit lan server adapter , 10/100/1000mbps , Intel i350 chipset - support i/OAT, VMDq virtualization , SR-ioV, RSS, ALB , 5GT/sec - includes extra low-profile only for 2U rackmount or slim desktop

      • Intel i340-T4 ( E1G44HT ) , pci-Express (4x) Quad-port gigabit lan server adapter , 10/100/1000mbps , Intel 82580Gb chipset - support i/OAT, RSS, VMDq virtualization, DCA, ALB , 5GT/sec - includes extra low-profile only for 2U rackmount or slim desktop]

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • H
        Harvy66
        last edited by

        The i350 is their flagship 1Gb chipset. T2 is working great for me.

        edit
        @extide this is a home install  8)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • E
          extide
          last edited by

          Those are fairly expensive, and if this is for a home installation, then any intel card, even a desktop one will be fine. Anything PCI-E is modern enough to be good for that.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DerelictD
            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
            last edited by

            I'm not convinced the people having problems with the intel cards aren't user error or some weird edge case.

            To my knowledge there is no documented problem.

            The $43 Pro/1000 PT dual card on amazon looks like a sweet spot for PCI-E NICs for pfSense in all but the most demanding applications.

            http://www.amazon.com/Intel-1000-Dual-Server-Adapter/dp/B000BMZHX2

            You might be able to find something that consumes less power, but I expect it will come at the cost of some performance.

            Or these HPs for only $29

            http://www.amazon.com/HP-412648-B21-PCI-Express-GigaBit-Adapter/dp/B000J3OPOU

            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • F
              Fabzster
              last edited by

              Hi

              Many thanks for all the replies.

              It is for a multi WAN gateway at my office< I currently have Dlink Cards in there and I read that is why I am receiving that error.

              So basically what everyone is saying is that even if I go for one of the Dual or Quad port cards I will be ok?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ?
                Guest
                last edited by

                Hi Fabzster,

                I would prefer to go with a Intel based server network adapter to
                be on the sure side to get maximum performance and support under
                pfSense. If you go by a dual port or quad port Intel based server network
                adapter is not really interesting, but be aware of the desktop one, they would
                be running also fine and are also supported for sure too, but the server adapters
                are using a DSP (digital signal processor) on the card that is taking much of the load
                and tasks from the main cpu and so far you get a real good network adapter.
                For home usage, my suggestion is;

                • Intel desktop adapters
                • Soekris LAN1841 Quad NIC
                  and for productive networks;
                • Intel server NICs
                • HotLava NICs (Intel based)

                Related to your question I´ll go with the
                Intel i350T2 , pci-Express (4x) Dual-port gigabit lan server adapter , 10/100/1000mbps , Intel i350 chipset

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.