Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    ITX Board For PFSense - Choice of Two?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    6 Posts 4 Posters 1.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      afasoas
      last edited by

      I'm looking to upgrade my pfSense box so that I can run the 64-bit version of pfSense. Current board is based around an Atom N270.
      I've narrowed it down to two boards based on price, power consumption and UK availability.

      In the blue corner we have the ASRock AD2550R/U3S3
      http://www.newegg.com/global/uk/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813157417

      In the red corner we have the Supermicro MBD-X9SCAA-L-O
      http://www.newegg.com/global/uk/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813182848

      Both are quite similar in terms of processing power, maximum memory and choice of NICs (Intel 82574L)

      That ASRock has PCIe (1x), and lots of SATA ports. It's fractionally cheaper too.
      The Supermicro board looks to be more energy efficient using the N2800, and will run from a 12v DC power source. That said the only expansion is a 32-bit PCI slot.

      Has anyone here got any experience with either of these two boards? I'd like to get something installed and stable within the next week or so.
      Thanks
      A

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A
        afasoas
        last edited by

        The choice was narrowed down further by lack of availability on the part of the SuperMicro board.
        I'm happy to report that I have pfSense 2.2 running on the ASRock AD2550R/U3S3.
        Running stably for over 12 hours now with some IPSec gateway connections and an OpenVPN client.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          messerchmidt
          last edited by

          why did you go with the older atoms?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K
            kejianshi
            last edited by

            Price, I'm sure.  Glad its working.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              jsvg
              last edited by

              http://www.asrockrack.com/general/productdetail.asp?Model=C2750D4I

              I've pushed upwards of 32,000 pps (Unfortunate routing accident) through this hardware with an intel quad interface NIC.  Handled it like a champ.

              Read this warning though: BEFORE you connect the onboard lan ports to an internet connection, for the love of all that is good, please connect the dedicated BMC ethernet port, update the BMC to the latest firmware, then disable BMC access through eth0 and eth1. Save yourself from getting hacked. By default the BMC controller is exposed through the onboard ethernet ports!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A
                afasoas
                last edited by

                My broadband connection gives 5.2 Mb/s down and 0.8 Mb/s up, ergo this hardware is more than suitable!!!
                It's difficult to justify spending more.

                I'm more than happy with the performance of it thus far.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.