Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PfSense for Home use? Necessary for my needs?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    31 Posts 13 Posters 22.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ?
      Guest
      last edited by

      @edwardwong

      I think ALIX APU4 can do what you want, the CPU has hardware AES encryption support, according to security router you should be able to achieve about 95Mbps SSL VPN throughput with AES encryption.

      Is this a Typo, I was thought that this is an "AMD G series T40E"
      based system without AES-NI and/or Intel QA?

      AMD G series T40E tech. specs.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        Guest
        last edited by

        Use the opportunity to upgrade your PC. With all the parts you pulled out of your desktop, you could build a solid router.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • O
          oppland
          last edited by

          I'm using an Atom D2500 with 4gb ram and it is plenty.

          SG-2440

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            JimPhreak
            last edited by

            @jbhowlesr:

            Use the opportunity to upgrade your PC. With all the parts you pulled out of your desktop, you could build a solid router.

            Huh?  Not s who or what post this is in response to.

            @oppland:

            I'm using an Atom D2500 with 4gb ram and it is plenty.

            Are you using OpenVPN?  What are your connection speeds?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • G
              GomezAddams
              last edited by

              You mention you have vmware. Why not run pfsense as a virtual?

              I'm also a windows and cisco guy, and I find pfsense fairly easy to use. If you've used Cisco's ASAs, pfsense takes a bit to get used to.

              The biggest frustration with pfsense is the lack of documentation.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                JimPhreak
                last edited by

                @GomezAddams:

                You mention you have vmware. Why not run pfsense as a virtual?

                I'm also a windows and cisco guy, and I find pfsense fairly easy to use. If you've used Cisco's ASAs, pfsense takes a bit to get used to.

                The biggest frustration with pfsense is the lack of documentation.

                I'm considering running it as a VM but I have some reservations about it.  First off my VM box runs my media server which is used very heavily by many users and I'm not sure how well it will work in conjunction with a router/firewall on the same box.  Also,  I like the idea that I can do maintenence on my VM box without taking down the Internet.

                As for the lack of documentation, I'm noticing that.  Hopefully I will be able to pickup the basics quickly so I can at least get my network running while I learn the more advanced features.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  Guest
                  last edited by

                  @JimPhreak

                  Hopefully I will be able to pickup the basics quickly so I can at least
                  get my network running while I learn the more advanced features.

                  There is also a book out about pfSense and another one will be released soon
                  if this would be interesting for you, to get faster skills.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A
                    antillie
                    last edited by

                    I came to pfSense from a very Cisco focused background. I work with ASA firewalls, catalyst switches, and IOS routers every day. I found pfSense to be rather easy to learn. At the end of the day a network is a network and they all work the same way.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • G
                      GomezAddams
                      last edited by

                      @BlueKobold:

                      @JimPhreak

                      Hopefully I will be able to pickup the basics quickly so I can at least
                      get my network running while I learn the more advanced features.

                      There is also a book out about pfSense and another one will be released soon
                      if this would be interesting for you, to get faster skills.

                      Lol, that new book has been going to be released "soon" for over a year now.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • G
                        GomezAddams
                        last edited by

                        @antillie:

                        I came to pfSense from a very Cisco focused background. I work with ASA firewalls, catalyst switches, and IOS routers every day. I found pfSense to be rather easy to learn. At the end of the day a network is a network and they all work the same way.

                        Well, yes, it is easy to to learn, but the ASA and pfsense seem (to me at least) to require different mindsets when figuring out how to get to where you want to go.

                        But you are right, at the end of the day, it is all just wrangling bits.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J
                          JimPhreak
                          last edited by

                          My main background is with Cisco switches and routers,  however in terms of security appliances I've never messed with any ASA's.  At work I use Sophos UTM which I actually love but from the research I've done it doesn't look like I can setup an OpenVPN tunnel to PIA with a kill switch from UTM.  It's the main reason I picked pfSense over it.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.