New to pfsense, what are my options? Need help!
-
After abit of reading, I just noticed. No hardware specs.
What is this running on? CPU? RAM? Disk space? etc etc…
I can imagine, for instance that if your machine was running low on ram and was deep into swap usage things might get pretty laggy.
(So, by "disabled" you mean there is no squid installed on your system?)
Yes, by disabled I mean I removed all the packages related to squid to rule them out.
System stats:
Name pfSense.localdomain
Version 2.2.1-RELEASE (amd64)
built on Fri Mar 13 08:16:49 CDT 2015
FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p6You are on the latest version.
Platform cdrom
CPU Type AMD Athlon
64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+
2 CPUs: 1 package(s) x 2 core(s)
Uptime 01 Hour 49 Minutes 45 Seconds
Current date/time
Wed Mar 25 21:58:31 UTC 2015
DNS server(s) 127.0.0.1
8.8.8.8
8.8.8.1
Last config change Wed Mar 25 21:08:01 UTC 2015
State table size
0% (126/303000)
Show states
MBUF Usage
1% (1270/189286)
Load average
0.00, 0.02, 0.00
CPU usage
(Updating in 10 seconds)
Memory usage
7% of 3036 MB
Disk usage
/ (cd9660): 100% of 223M
/tmp (ufs in RAM): 17% of 19M
/var (ufs in RAM): 61% of 31M
/etc (ufs in RAM): 42% of 19M
/usr (unionfs): 94% of 242M
/conf (ufs in RAM): 1% of 5.4M
/home (ufs in RAM): 0% of 5.4Mlast pid: 38297; load averages: 0.01, 0.02, 0.00 up 0+01:49:17 21:58:03
123 processes: 3 running, 99 sleeping, 21 waitingMem: 47M Active, 45M Inact, 173M Wired, 134M Buf, 2692M Free
-
Oh, and I am running off the live CD at the moment… testing QoS setups with a clean install with no additional packages. When I was using squid it was running from a hard drive install on the 80GB SSD drive in the box.
-
No idea. I wouldn't be testing a livecd though. Thats just me.
Keep banging away. It can be done.
-
No idea. I wouldn't be testing a livecd though. Thats just me.
Keep banging away. It can be done.
I hear ya, I've been switching back and forth between the live cd and hd install to see if it made any differences… but nope.. same results either way.
-
You will get some additional latency with shaping.
-
You will get some additional latency with shaping.
Well with Tomato QoS I am able to get consistently under 100ms ping times even when the bandwidth is saturated… and voip / games / etc remains low latency and lag free. It took some learning to setup, but I had it up and running great in a couple of hours of tweaking and fine tuning and it has been working without a hitch for a couple of years now.
Ideally I'd like to setup the pfsense firewall between the tomato router (gateway) and the rest of my LAN (switch) and let tomato handle QoS/DHCP and let the pfsense box handle everything else (Proxy/Filtering/Firewall/NAS/DNS/OpenVPN) but I am not sure what steps to take to set this up and I am not having any luck finding information on how to make it work...
-
That configuration is the opposite of ideal. Also, how are you measuring latency?