Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Vlans behind PFSense Slow

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    8 Posts 4 Posters 1.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A Offline
      Access4IT
      last edited by

      Hello,

      We recently installed 2 PFSense firewalls and everything is up and running.
      Now customers complain that everything is very slow in their networks (Every customer has it's own vlan).

      VLANS are configured on our Layer 3 Switches (HP).

      Let's say we have a hosted exchange on VLAN 100 and Customer A on VLAN 200. In our previous setup (With GTA firewalls) everything was running fast. Now Browsing through mail is 10 times slower.

      Someone any idea based on this? I can give more details…..

      Tnx allready

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DerelictD Offline
        Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
        last edited by

        If you are routing between VLAN 100 and VLAN 200 on a layer 3 switch, pfSense isn't involved at all.

        Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
        A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
        DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
        Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A Offline
          Access4IT
          last edited by

          There is no routing between VLANS. ACL's configured that no VLAN can access another vlan.

          If a customer opens outlook than outlook does a lookup through internet (DNS)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • H Offline
            heper
            last edited by

            @Access4IT:

            There is no routing between VLANS. ACL's configured that no VLAN can access another vlan.

            If a customer opens outlook than outlook does a lookup through internet (DNS)

            so you are going vlan200 –> pfsense --> internet --> pfsense --> vlan 100 ??? why would you want todo that ???

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DerelictD Offline
              Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
              last edited by

              Then don't call it a layer 3 switch.  I'm trying to get my head around you configuring a layer 3 switch with ACLs preventing vlans from accessing each other.  Need more info.  This makes no sense.

              Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
              A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
              DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
              Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A Offline
                Access4IT
                last edited by

                Every Vlan is a customers domain (DC - RDS - SQL)

                Our hosted Exchange infra is also a VLAN.

                No customer needs to be aware of other customers on our IAAS

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ Online
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                  last edited by

                  huh?? You have no need of layer 3 switch in this setup. vlans can not talk to each other without going through a layer3 device to route the traffic.  In your case this would be pfsense.

                  Where exactly are you customers?  This sounds like a hosted setup somewhere in a DC, and your customers are not really in the DC..  So where exactly are the customers, are they coming from the internet to their vlan via ?? Just to then go back out to pfsense to get to exchange?

                  You say 2 pfsense, so you have them in a carp setup?  A bit more detail is going to be required to help you figure out where any sort of bottle neck might be.

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A Offline
                    Access4IT
                    last edited by

                    I've added my layer 2 and 3 design as pictures.

                    Indeed this is a hosted setup in a datacenter. All customers make connections over internet to their network (VLAN)
                    Take a look at the pictures.

                    Layer 2 picture is not correct…...eth 2 on A  to eth 3 on B is PFSYNC in PFSENSE setup......forget to correct that.

                    Our problem is that with our GTA firewalls we had no complaining customers, but with the PFSense firewalls customers have 10 times slower browsing the internet or browse their mail is slow even apps in their VLANs are very slow.

                    For now i put back the GTA and evrything is fine again.

                    ![Infrastructuur design v1 0 laag 2.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Infrastructuur design v1 0 laag 2.png)
                    ![Infrastructuur design v1 0 laag 2.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Infrastructuur design v1 0 laag 2.png_thumb)
                    ![Infrastructuur design v1 0.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Infrastructuur design v1 0.png)
                    ![Infrastructuur design v1 0.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Infrastructuur design v1 0.png_thumb)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.