Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    How to test for actual maxium throughput

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    3 Posts 3 Posters 2.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      Cjaiceman
      last edited by

      Hello all, I was wondering what would be the better way to test how much traffic my pfSense box could handle. I already looked at the system requirements for speed, but they are a little broad and was wondering if I could get closer to a real number. I really just want to know so I know how much the computer can handle before an upgrade would be required.

      The specs:
      Intel P4 @ 1.3GHz (423pin, not 478)
      384MB (64MBx2 + 128MBx2) RDRAM
      Intel MB (not sure of the chipset, but the computer is a Gateway Performance 1300)
      Linksys EG1032 Gigabit PCI NIC x2 (LAN & WAN)
      10GB HDD (5400RPM)

      I have thought about hooking up a computer on either side of the box and moving files, but this could be limited by the HDD speed, and I want to avoid that. I know about IxChariot, but I don't want to pay for it since I really would only use it once or twice, so I was wondering if there was something else that is free, or a trial that I could use that would allow me to use it for a short amount of time?

      Thanks.  ;D

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • GruensFroeschliG
        GruensFroeschli
        last edited by

        http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?action=search

        "check throughput"

        We do what we must, because we can.

        Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          Kris.J
          last edited by

          There is one thread from almost exactly a year ago that matches GF's search suggestion, here it is:

          http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,4505.0.html

          Your hardware looks fine though - what kind of WAN link are you hooking it up to - what is the speed?  Your upstream connection will likely be your bottleneck, and that hardware will have plenty of cycles to spare filling it up.

          I did it for the lulz.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.