URL Table not working correctly
-
I converted all the IP's from x.x.x.x/24 to x.x.x.0/24, and imported it via pfbng, it imported successfully (just as it did previously), but in the pfbng dashboard widget the status is not displaying (shows the new line, but no stats), and when I click on the alias in the rule, 0 IP's are displayed (i.e. for other aliases when you put the mouse over the alias it shows x IP's and then lists the IP's).
Any other ideas?
-
Send a screenshot of the Widget and of the Rule for this Alias.
-
As a side note regarding this, I'm also noting that the is_subnet*() functions in /etc/inc/util.inc are very useless, they don't verify a valid subnet at all.
-
In this case, the limit seems to be linked to dirty a data type restriction, because out of these problems is easy,Casesam but there is no problem to check my previous post codes can only be regarded as a conjecture at this stage, but I suspect there may be a reason for exchange limits.Samsung Galaxy S6 edge cover
-
I converted all the IP's from x.x.x.x/24 to x.x.x.0/24, and imported it via pfbng, it imported successfully (just as it did previously), but in the pfbng dashboard widget the status is not displaying (shows the new line, but no stats), and when I click on the alias in the rule, 0 IP's are displayed (i.e. for other aliases when you put the mouse over the alias it shows x IP's and then lists the IP's).
Any other ideas?
If you see the widget showing blank status and the mouseover of the Alias is blank, that means that there is some incorrect IPs in the list…
pfBNG v1.09 uses a Regex function to match IPs including CIDRs. The regex is not 100% and there are some corner cases where it can allow an incorrect CIDR value... The next release v2.0 uses all string functions to process and validate each IP which will avoid these corner cases...
There has to be some malformed IPs of some sort in this file of yours. Try to split the file into smaller segments, then load each into pfBNG to see which segment is of issue. Then narrow it down again until you find the issue. You can also post the whole file in pastebin/dropbox etc and PM me a link to the file and I can help figure it out for you.
-
So…thanks for all the help, I got it working! I cleaned up all the records, replacing x.x.x.x/24 with x.x.x.0/24 and replacing /32 with just the IP. After cleaning up, I was able to get it to work both as a URL Table and in pfBNG. In fact, in pfBNG, it found 120k dups, so half of the IP's listed were dups...so my list is now down to 165k'ish.
One anomaly I noticed with pfBNG (I only mention it here instead of in a new post, since it was suggested/referenced here)...is that changing the state to OFF had no affect. I would change it to off, then save, then force update (Update Custom List was set to Update Custom List), and it would still block and show up in the dashboard widget. While it was still set to off, I went into Firewall -> Rules and deleted the rules associated with the pfBNG alias, and when I forced update, the rules recreated themselves. The only way I found to disabled the rules and blocking, was to delete them from pfBNG -> IPv4.
Other than that, it's working perfectly now! Thanks again for all the suggestions, help and code snippets!
-
replacing /32 with just the IP
/32 shouldn't cause an issue with/without
is that changing the state to OFF had no affect. I would change it to off, then save, then force update (Update Custom List was set to Update Custom List)
Are you using the Custom List box for these IPs? or are you saving the IPs to a file in the pfSense box and adding it to the URL / local file entry?
The "state" is only for the URL / Local file entry. The Custom list needs to be empty or it will create a Firewall rule automatically.
-
Are you using the Custom List box for these IPs? or are you saving the IPs to a file in the pfSense box and adding it to the URL / local file entry?
The "state" is only for the URL / Local file entry. The Custom list needs to be empty or it will create a Firewall rule automatically.
I'm using a URL (not local) and the file is not empty. So there's no way to "disable" without deleting the entry?
