Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Traffic Shaping Worse Than Baseline?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Traffic Shaping
    23 Posts 5 Posters 5.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      CaptainElmo
      last edited by

      Is any part of the PRIQ queue processing offloaded in a manner which HFSC is not? Could there be a situation where I am hitting processing limits of an offloaded resources which are not reported as part of the main CPU statistics?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • H
        Harvy66
        last edited by

        I don't think the shapers use any offloading, but they make use of certain driver features

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • N
          Nullity
          last edited by

          @CaptainElmo:

          Is any part of the PRIQ queue processing offloaded in a manner which HFSC is not? Could there be a situation where I am hitting processing limits of an offloaded resources which are not reported as part of the main CPU statistics?

          The CPU needed for any sched algo will be minimal. Elegance and efficiency are perhaps more important than actual scheduling capability (Stochastic Fair Scheduling, for example). HFSC, perhaps the most complex and CPU intensive, was capable of 80,000+ packets per second on a 200Mhz Pentium Pro.

          Please correct any obvious misinformation in my posts.
          -Not a professional; an arrogant ignoramous.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.