Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Interfaces "dying" at high traffic

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    11 Posts 6 Posters 2.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H Offline
      Harvy66
      last edited by

      What kind of NICs? My box at home works just fine NATing with a sustained 1.5Gb/s full duplex, which is the fastest my other test machine can reach.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T Offline
        tehnikk
        last edited by

        Interfaces are Hyper-V network interfaces, Marvell E8053 and Realtek 8111CP.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • KOMK Offline
          KOM
          last edited by

          I was doing some testing of 2.2.x under ESXi with iPerf a couple of months ago and I pounded the linsk at max without any issue.  This was between two VMs, on on LAN and one on DMZ (OPT1).

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • H Offline
            Harvy66
            last edited by

            Realtek is pretty bad in general. Not sure about Marvell.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DerelictD Offline
              Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
              last edited by

              Could this be mbufs? What's Status > RRD Graphs, System tab Graphs: Mbuf show for a period where it croaked?

              Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
              A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
              DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
              Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T Offline
                tehnikk
                last edited by

                I doubt that it would show in the "mbuf" graph since it happens a few seconds after a SMB file transfer is initiated.
                Here are some graphs:

                This one is interesting since it shows some changes:

                I think that a recent update is causing this.
                These graphs are from a pfSense running on a COMMELL LV-674:
                http://www.commell.com.tw/Product/SBC/LV-674.HTM

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A Offline
                  arbisoft
                  last edited by

                  I am also having the same issue with latest release 2.2.5. On excess load my lan interface stop responding.
                  on status > inerface I can see lot of in/out and collision on my lan interface , mbufs are just fine.
                  I am using Intel gig Nic for lan interface.
                  With same load on my ubuntu machine work as a nat router there is not any issue on lan.
                  what should be causing the lan to stop responding in excess load?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T Offline
                    tehnikk
                    last edited by

                    Come on guys this is a real problem. It hasn't been a problem before on the same hardware, so it must have come with a recent update.
                    Isn't anyone else experiencing the same issue?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M Offline
                      mer
                      last edited by

                      @tehnikk:

                      Come on guys this is a real problem. It hasn't been a problem before on the same hardware, so it must have come with a recent update.
                      Isn't anyone else experiencing the same issue?

                      Well a couple of posters above indicated they aren't seeing the issue, I'm not seeing the issue, frankly, there isn't a whole lot of information provided to try and help.

                      What kind of configuration do you have?  Extra packages, rules, etc?
                      What do network stats say; one of the posters above talks about collisions.  Collisions are often caused by a duplex mismatch between the two ends of a physical link.  Set both ends to autonegotiate or set both ends to the same fixed settings.

                      What about CPU utilization when the problem occurs?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DerelictD Offline
                        Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                        last edited by

                        There should be 0 collisions on a switched, gig-e network.

                        Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                        A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                        DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                        Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.