Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Attempting Traffic Shaping on multiple interfaces.

    Traffic Shaping
    8
    9
    4.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G
      g0dsp33d
      last edited by

      Other than the wizard not supporting it, I can't find any reason why pfSense would not support it.

      So I am manually adding my rules/queues in to see what happens.

      Here is the link to my post on my network setup.
      http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=987.0

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        sullrich
        last edited by

        Will not work.  Backend code is not 100% completed for multiple interface shaping.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A
          agismaniax
          last edited by

          when it will be completed?
          Right now i'm using 4 WANs and I have a problem to manage bit-torrent traffic from some users.  :'( :'( :'(

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • H
            hoba
            last edited by

            This won't appear in 1.0. You'll have to wait for 1.1 which will feature some huge changes of the way interfaces are handled at the backend to support all this.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B
              billm
              last edited by

              @hoba:

              This won't appear in 1.0. You'll have to wait for 1.1 which will feature some huge changes of the way interfaces are handled at the backend to support all this.

              Even then, there's no guarantee :)  The interface rewrite is a large enough change that I'm probably going to end up creating a branch for that work as I'll be touching a LOT of code.  Unless someone else works on it (leon maybe), I doubt 1.1 will get any huge shaper improvements (not if we want to release 1.1 in under a year).

              –Bill

              pfSense core developer
              blog - http://www.ucsecurity.com/
              twitter - billmarquette

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • H
                hoba
                last edited by

                Btw, talking about features of 1.1 is a look in the crystal ball anyway and highly speculative. This doesn't only apply to the feature mentioned in this thread.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • N
                  nima.m
                  last edited by

                  If you have multiple interface, One WAN and the rest has been bridged with LAN, will then Trafic shaper Work ?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • L
                    Leoandru
                    last edited by

                    @billm:

                    @hoba:

                    This won't appear in 1.0. You'll have to wait for 1.1 which will feature some huge changes of the way interfaces are handled at the backend to support all this.

                    Even then, there's no guarantee :)  The interface rewrite is a large enough change that I'm probably going to end up creating a branch for that work as I'll be touching a LOT of code.  Unless someone else works on it (leon maybe), I doubt 1.1 will get any huge shaper improvements (not if we want to release 1.1 in under a year).

                    –Bill

                    I could take a look in that direction. but not in the very near future, unfortunately I can't find a lot of free time on my hands ATM. probably a month or so down the road when my work load reduces to nothing. hopefully.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      smeg9
                      last edited by

                      This would also be useful for me..

                      But one of the lines can be shaped still right, which is better than none, if VoiP could be forced down the shaped line, UNLESS the shaped line is down, then that'd be fine.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.