Nat reflection difference
jlevesque last edited by
I'm trying to setup nat reflection for one of my lan:
Current setup is:
1 "guest" WIFI LAN - which is able to access internet but not LAN
I have a NAT from WAN to LAN ip on 443
Of course, WIFI cannot access the NAT but it want it to(owa/activesync on this)
I enable pure NAT on the rule directly, it doesn't work.(+ automatic outbound in system/NAT)
I enable NAT+proxy, it does work.
I want to know, is there any "cons" of using NAT+proxy instead of purenat, what do you think prevents PURE NAT mode from working?
KOM last edited by
No idea, I try to stay away from NAT Reflection and use split DNS instead. NAT+proxy uses a helper app while Pure NAT uses only rules.
arduino last edited by
^ Split DNS +1