Unable to get 1 Gb NAT throughput with new Jetway NUC build
-
@Phishfry:
You have narrowed down your bottleneck to pfSense. If the difference between 936/936 and 900/920 is a dealbreaker than use Sophos. If your nitpicking over 3% difference you should consider yourself lucky to have such minor problems…
No kidding. I'll trade you my 4/1.2 connection for your meager 900/920 any day. :o
But I'd still try to eek every last bit of performance out it myself too….......
-
@Phishfry:
You have narrowed down your bottleneck to pfSense. If the difference between 936/936 and 900/920 is a dealbreaker than use Sophos. If your nitpicking over 3% difference you should consider yourself lucky to have such minor problems…
Yes but that is with me adding no packages on at all. What I am setting up I want to last me for years to come with breathing room to grow for the future.
Just like Jailer said but i'll put in full size text
But I'd still try to eek every last bit of performance out it myself too….......
That is exactly what I am trying to do.
-
I am new but interested.
I am having a hard time deciding whether the OP is running the AT&T modem in bridge mode when he tests the pfSense build? It is easy to tell. If the pfSense build is getting an outside IP address. Otherwise he has double NAT working against him.
I just got TWC 300 megabit connection. I am trying figure out how to maximize my connection speed.
-
I am new but interested.
I am having a hard time deciding whether the OP is running the AT&T modem in bridge mode when he tests the pfSense build? It is easy to tell. If the pfSense build is getting an outside IP address. Otherwise he has double NAT working against him.
I just got TWC 300 megabit connection. I am trying figure out how to maximize my connection speed.
AT&T does not offer the ability to do a bridge mode, only the crappy IP Passthrough.
