Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Best media to run pfSense? CF vs CF-Microdrive vs SSD?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    6 Posts 3 Posters 2.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      sofakng
      last edited by

      I'm currently running pfSense using a CompactFlash Microdrive and it's been running great (using the full install of pfSense and not nanobsd) but I'm beginning to worry about the card failing since it's very old.

      I was thinking about purchasing a new card or drive, but what's the best option for pfSense?

      SSD drives (30GB, etc) are extremely cheap and I would expect to be better performance than CompactFlash, right?  What about the CF Microdrive?  Also, would I install NanoBSD to an SSD to prevent wearing the drive out?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        Guest
        last edited by

        I was thinking about purchasing a new card or drive, but what's the best option for pfSense?

        What packets did you install and running?
        What services you want to use or offer?

        As I see it right it would be more tend to be;
        CFcard = NanoBSD for lowest or no write cycles and also no Squid as caching proxy, AVScan or logging
        CompactFlash Microdrive = NanoBSD but not read only and more write cycles and perhaps a few loggings
        SSD/mSATA = pfSense full install with Squid as a caching proxy, Snort and logging

        SSD drives (30GB, etc) are extremely cheap and I would expect to be better performance than CompactFlash, right?

        This might be that the performance is better, but in former days the CF Microdrive was also not cheap
        to get the hands on, so I ask my self why it must now being cheap?

        SSD drives (30GB, etc) are extremely cheap and I would expect to be better performance than CompactFlash, right?  What about the CF Microdrive?  Also, would I install NanoBSD to an SSD to prevent wearing the drive out?

        So a SSD should be really from a vendor that is selling good products like  Samsung perhaps:

        • Samsung MZ-M5E120BW mSATA
        • Samsung 840/850 Pro (SATA III SSD)
        • Samsung 950 Pro M.2 (PCIe .30 x4 - 2280)

        If you only want to use pfSense as a firewall and many logs would be written and/or Squid will be used
        as a caching Proxy it could be better to go with a greater model with more space, something 120 GB or
        240 GB would be right as I see it right.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          sofakng
          last edited by

          SSD drives (30GB, etc) are extremely cheap and I would expect to be better performance than CompactFlash, right?

          This might be that the performance is better, but in former days the CF Microdrive was also not cheap
          to get the hands on, so I ask my self why it must now being cheap?
          I'm not sure what you mean by this?

          Also, is there a benefit to running Squid for a simple home network?  Right now I only use pfSense for routing and no extra packages…

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ?
            Guest
            last edited by

            I'm not sure what you mean by this?

            Often you will get what you pay for. So a more quality mSATA or SSD would be perhaps longer running.

            Also, is there a benefit to running Squid for a simple home network?

            If Squid will be a caching proxy it could be that a SSD/mSATA is speeding up this then.

            Right now I only use pfSense for routing and no extra packages…

            Then a 30 GB one could be right sorted in the dimension.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              messerchmidt
              last edited by

              http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-2-5-Inch-Internal-MZ-75E250B-AM/dp/B00OAJ412U/ref=sr_1_1?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1452203763&sr=1-1&keywords=evo+850

              $20 more than the 120gb, and can be used in the future for something else if need be

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ?
                Guest
                last edited by

                $20 more than the 120gb, and can be used in the future for something else if need be

                Others were reporting here in the forum that the Samsung 850 EVO seems to be not working together
                with the TRIM command or support from pfSense. So I personally would be aware of this SSD.

                In earlier times that SSD have had also Firmware problems and I really don´t know if this would be
                solved 100% out. So an older Samsung840 Pro without this problems is also fast and cheaper to get
                as it is older, but without known failures and firmware problems.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.