• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Notification following wizard - possible feature change in wizard

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Traffic Shaping
9 Posts 4 Posters 2.4k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P
    PantsManUK
    last edited by Jan 26, 2016, 9:43 AM Jan 26, 2016, 9:36 AM

    Didn't want to reply in https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=104900.0 for what is (on the face of it) a very similar error, just in case this isn't mostly the same thing.

    After running the wizard to get a config, I'm immediately getting a notification:-

    "There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug.129: errors in queue definition - The line in question reads [129]: queue qInternet on em0 bandwidth 15728.64Kb hfsc ( ecn , linkshare 15728.64Kb , upperlimit 15728.64Kb ){ qACK, qP2P, qVOIP }]"

    Now, on the assumption that the same initial "fix" Nullity suggested in the above linked thread holds true (delete the upperlimit from qInternet as it's superficially redundant), why is the wizard applying this limiter at all?

    (We have a 30Mbps pipe dynamically shared between up and down, so 15Mbps 50/50 split in the traffic shaper made most sense to me)

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • N
      Nullity
      last edited by Jan 26, 2016, 2:28 PM

      With the usage of qInternet, I think upper-limit is intended to act like the rate-limit applied to the actual interface in a multi-WAN (or multi-LAN?) situation. I dunno if it really makes a difference or if it really is unneeded.

      Your error seems different, since you did not exceed the interface's bitrate with the queue's bitrate (afaict).

      Please correct any obvious misinformation in my posts.
      -Not a professional; an arrogant ignoramous.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        PantsManUK
        last edited by Jan 26, 2016, 3:47 PM

        The wizard applied the same value to both qInternet and the interface, and removing upperlimit has "fixed" the notification (a very small annoyance only).

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • N
          Nullity
          last edited by Jan 26, 2016, 5:07 PM

          @PantsManUK:

          The wizard applied the same value to both qInternet and the interface, and removing upperlimit has "fixed" the notification (a very small annoyance only).

          Oh. Well, that seems like an obvious candidate for the bug-tracker.

          I wonder if it is already fixed in 2.3.

          Please correct any obvious misinformation in my posts.
          -Not a professional; an arrogant ignoramous.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • H
            Harvy66
            last edited by Jan 26, 2016, 6:17 PM

            "15728.64Kb" seems like a very precise bandwidth setting. Maybe the interface isn't set to this precision and qInternet is technically greater than the interface, eve if slightly slow. /guessing

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P
              PantsManUK
              last edited by Feb 18, 2016, 9:43 AM Feb 18, 2016, 9:39 AM

              Tiny bit "digging up the dead", but after a few days of no notifications, I started getting a notification for almost the exact same reason on the same rule (following a reboot - been ignoring it for a while due to other work getting in my way).

              So, this morning I started looking through all the rules and realised that qInternet on WAN (which in theory matches qInternet on LAN), was in fact subtly different: rather than the bandwidth limits being expressed in Kbit/s, they were in Mbit/s. I've now swapped LAN qInternet over to Mbit units and will find out if that has fixed it next time it restarts.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • N
                Nullity
                last edited by Feb 18, 2016, 11:46 AM

                @PantsManUK:

                Tiny bit "digging up the dead", but after a few days of no notifications, I started getting a notification for almost the exact same reason on the same rule (following a reboot - been ignoring it for a while due to other work getting in my way).

                So, this morning I started looking through all the rules and realised that qInternet on WAN (which in theory matches qInternet on LAN), was in fact subtly different: rather than the bandwidth limits being expressed in Kbit/s, they were in Mbit/s. I've now swapped LAN qInternet over to Mbit units and will find out if that has fixed it next time it restarts.

                Forgive my ignorance, but why does qInternet exist on the WAN? (multi-WAN?)

                Please correct any obvious misinformation in my posts.
                -Not a professional; an arrogant ignoramous.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • P
                  PantsManUK
                  last edited by Feb 19, 2016, 5:07 PM

                  Can't really answer this Nullity, other than to say I only have two wizards available - "Multi Lan/Wan" and "Dedicated Links". Reading the draft book I guessed I didn't want to use "Dedicated Links"  ;D

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C
                    cmb
                    last edited by Feb 20, 2016, 12:29 AM

                    likely same issue as in https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/5721

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                      This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                      consent.not_received