Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Siproxd: sip_utils.c: ERROR:I'm trying to delete a VIA but it's not mine!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfSense Packages
    7 Posts 2 Posters 2.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R
      routerfreak
      last edited by

      Hi all!
      Has somebody also seen this message in the system log. I got this message a couple of times per day:

      siproxd[45176]: sip_utils.c:627 ERROR:I'm trying to delete a VIA but it's not mine! host=192.168.110.4
      

      192.168.110.4 is a physical PBX behind siproxd (Elmeg T484).

      What does this message mean?
      Does anybody have an idea how to debug this error?
      PBX is working, incoming and outgoing calls are fine.

      Kind regards,
      routerfreak

      Router Hardware: Supermicro A1SRi-2758F, 2x Kingston KVR16LSE11-4KF (4GB DDR3L SODIMM-1600 ECC),
      Router OS: pfSense-2.4.3-RELEASE, Packages: Cron 0.3.7_2, Open-VM-Tools 10.1.0, siproxd 1.1.3_3

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jimpJ
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
        last edited by

        You should not have a PBX behind siproxd, it's intended only for Phones.

        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R
          routerfreak
          last edited by

          I'm masquerade only SIP trunks, so my physical PBX is acting as a SIP UAC (client). My PBX is not a SIP UAS (server). No other SIP phones would like to register with my PBX. This is not possible.

          siproxd is intented to masquerade SIP clients, this is right.

          Any other hints for me?

          Router Hardware: Supermicro A1SRi-2758F, 2x Kingston KVR16LSE11-4KF (4GB DDR3L SODIMM-1600 ECC),
          Router OS: pfSense-2.4.3-RELEASE, Packages: Cron 0.3.7_2, Open-VM-Tools 10.1.0, siproxd 1.1.3_3

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jimpJ
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by

            As far as I'm aware, it's not intended for that situation. I have only ever seen it used for phones, never for a PBX even acting as a client.

            If you only have a need for one external client such as your scenario, you're better off without siproxd. Setup proper outbound NAT for the traffic from the PBX and fix the NAT settings in the PBX and you won't need the trouble from siproxd.

            Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • R
              routerfreak
              last edited by

              The Elmeg T484 PBX is acting like a "multiple client device". This is because you can create many clients on this PBX, one client for every SIP provider and different phone number.

              Router Hardware: Supermicro A1SRi-2758F, 2x Kingston KVR16LSE11-4KF (4GB DDR3L SODIMM-1600 ECC),
              Router OS: pfSense-2.4.3-RELEASE, Packages: Cron 0.3.7_2, Open-VM-Tools 10.1.0, siproxd 1.1.3_3

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jimpJ
                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                last edited by

                Same advice applies. It's still just one client from the firewall's perspective. Ditch siproxd and setup proper NAT on the firewall and PBX, you'll be better off.

                Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R
                  routerfreak
                  last edited by

                  Hi jimp! Yes, this is a good objection. I will think about a proper NAT setup in the next days. Thanks for your advice.

                  Router Hardware: Supermicro A1SRi-2758F, 2x Kingston KVR16LSE11-4KF (4GB DDR3L SODIMM-1600 ECC),
                  Router OS: pfSense-2.4.3-RELEASE, Packages: Cron 0.3.7_2, Open-VM-Tools 10.1.0, siproxd 1.1.3_3

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.