Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PRIQ - No LAN Bandwidth from wizard

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Traffic Shaping
    6 Posts 3 Posters 1.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      moikerz
      last edited by

      After going through the traffic shaping wizard for Multi-WAN, Multi-LAN, selecting PRIQ for both and entering the up/down values for my single WAN connection, my LAN queue has no bandwidth associated on it. I'm not sure if this is intentional.

      Do I need to have my desired WAN upload limit put on my LAN queue?
      pf_priq_lan_bandwidth.jpg
      pf_priq_lan_bandwidth.jpg_thumb

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • N
        Nullity
        last edited by

        WAN is upload, LAN is download.

        I think it defaults to the interface's bandwidth, which is logical when using PRIQ on download (since download cannot technically be "prioritized" because the data has already arrived and moving it from a slow WAN to a fast LAN will encounter virtually no queue/buffer).

        What version of pfSense are you running? Did you input a bandwidth when setting up download within the wizard?

        Please correct any obvious misinformation in my posts.
        -Not a professional; an arrogant ignoramous.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H
          Harvy66
          last edited by

          Shaping the downstream is much less effective because the data has already been sent and you're shaping on the wrong side of the bottleneck, but there is still benefit because dropping/marking packets will still signal TCP to backoff. The bigger issue with shaping the download is you need to wait for the RTT before TCP can slow down, but on the upload, it's effectively instant.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            moikerz
            last edited by

            Sorry, I knew I should've included the WAN screenshot as well :P Now attached.

            I'm running v2.2.5 (have not had time to upgrade to 2.2.6 yet).

            I guess the real reason I'm asking is because I seem to have bufferbloat (see queue screenshot). I have "Codel Active Queue" checked for all queues already.

            Does this look normal, or have I missed something?

            pf_priq_wan_bandwidth.jpg
            pf_priq_wan_bandwidth.jpg_thumb
            pf_queue_status.jpg
            pf_queue_status.jpg_thumb

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • N
              Nullity
              last edited by

              You have missed something. It seems like you do not understand what bufferbloat is.

              PPS is practically unrelated to bufferbloat.

              Please correct any obvious misinformation in my posts.
              -Not a professional; an arrogant ignoramous.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                moikerz
                last edited by

                Nope! Fair enough :)

                Sounds like I have the basics of PRIQ set up correctly, thanks!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.