Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Support for PCEngines APU

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    7 Posts 3 Posters 2.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      kevindd992002
      last edited by

      I hope this is a valid question. Since Netgate is now promoting your own hardware (in the past you guys were promoting the PCEngines APU), will you still continuously improving support for PCEngines' APU's to be fair? I've read that there are a couple of problems when pfsense is used in the new APU2C and I was hoping those get fixed soon before I decide to buy this April when they're already available.

      What are your thoughts in this?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jwt Netgate
        last edited by

        I'm not sure what you mean by "to be fair".

        We don't do anything to make the APU/APU2 solution any less than what it is: a solid, inexpensive platform that many people like.  The APU2 has Intel NICs and the Jaguar cores in the SoC support AES-NI, so performance on the APU2 should be very good compared to the APU, which uses Realtek NICs and a SoC with Bobcat cores (no AES-NI).

        This speaks some to the reason I put support in FreeBSD / pfSense for AES-GCM:  Namely, so there would be benefit from AES-NI instructions when using IPsec.  I knew that a forthcoming PC Engines board would have support for AES-NI, and therefore the larger community would receive more benefit from an AES-NI first strategy, rather than focusing on the QuickAssist in the C2000 (which, as you note, is the base for our current products.)  I can tell you that QuickAssist is substantially faster than AES-NI in these applications.

        You should understand that we don't test on APU2, mostly because we don't have one.
        We do test releases on on APU, because, as you also note, we used to sell them.

        If there are problems when pfSense is used on the APU2©, then I've not been told about them.  "Patches Accepted" is the normative response here.

        I hope this answers your question.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          kevindd992002
          last edited by

          Got it! Thanks for the feedback. I'll definitely buy the APU2 then :)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            jwt Netgate
            last edited by

            @kevindd992002:

            Got it! Thanks for the feedback. I'll definitely buy the APU2 then :)

            Enjoy!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              Jeremy11one
              last edited by

              @jwt:

              You should understand that we don't test on APU2, mostly because we don't have one.
              We do test releases on on APU, because, as you also note, we used to sell them.

              I emailed PcEngines today about this, and Pascal Dornier told me that they recently sent the pfSense team two samples of their APU2.  Hopefully, the APU2 will get good testing now for future releases.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K
                kevindd992002
                last edited by

                That's right. I was actually the one who sent them this forum thread for them to know that the pfsense team are very willing to test their new APU2 so let's hope for the best :)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  jwt Netgate
                  last edited by

                  We don't test each release on all available hardware.  That would be a LOT of work.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.