Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Traffic Shaper Wizard No Interfaces Found

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    10 Posts 6 Posters 3.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D Offline
      depster
      last edited by

      Having issues with being able to complete the traffic shaping wizard on 2.3-RC on a Netgate APU4 device.

      When I select either wizard and enter 1 lan or wan connect the wizard reports "You have less interfaces than number of connections!".

      Any ideas?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • B Offline
        brianc69
        last edited by

        I also have the apu4 and unable to get traffic snapping working. In my case it's a bandwidth exceeds child or something like that.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jimpJ Offline
          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
          last edited by

          That means the count you entered doesn't match what the system believes you have, in terms of shaping-capable interfaces.

          If you don't have a gateway selected on a static IP address WAN (on Interfaces > WAN, that is), the system won't count it as a WAN, so it will say you don't have enough interfaces.

          Similarly if you do have a gateway selected on a LAN (which you shouldn't!), then the shaper wizard will treat it as a WAN and say you don't have enough interfaces.

          Lastly, if you have interfaces configured in a way that does not support ALTQ (e.g. lagg alone with no VLANs), those are not available as shaping interfaces, and are excluded from being counted.

          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

          Do not Chat/PM for help!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C Offline
            cengbrecht
            last edited by

            Alright, so I also have this issue.

            My configs are as follows:
            Wan with static settings, has a set gateway, and works properly. (All the information that you have specified so far. :P )

            LAN (LAGG) With two VLAN's 1 and 1000, admin and guest (Not in use but they are there)

            Still receiving the "You have less interfaces than number of connections!" notice.

            Attached are the two connections configs.
            Any other information you need please let me know. :)

            screenshot.000056.jpg
            screenshot.000056.jpg_thumb
            screenshot.000057.jpg
            screenshot.000057.jpg_thumb
            screenshot.000058.png
            screenshot.000058.png_thumb
            screenshot.000059.png
            screenshot.000059.png_thumb
            screenshot.000060.png
            screenshot.000060.png_thumb
            screenshot.000061.png
            screenshot.000061.png_thumb

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • F Offline
              Flops
              last edited by

              Why does the WAN interface need to be set to static to be considered for Traffic Shaping?

              @jimp:

              That means the count you entered doesn't match what the system believes you have, in terms of shaping-capable interfaces.

              If you don't have a gateway selected on a static IP address WAN (on Interfaces > WAN, that is), the system won't count it as a WAN, so it will say you don't have enough interfaces.

              Similarly if you do have a gateway selected on a LAN (which you shouldn't!), then the shaper wizard will treat it as a WAN and say you don't have enough interfaces.

              Lastly, if you have interfaces configured in a way that does not support ALTQ (e.g. lagg alone with no VLANs), those are not available as shaping interfaces, and are excluded from being counted.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • DerelictD Offline
                Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                last edited by

                That's not what he said. He said if WAN is static it needs to have a gateway set to be considered a WAN interface by the wizard.

                You can get your WAN address/gateway via DHCP, etc, too.

                Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • F Offline
                  Flops
                  last edited by

                  My mistake - I read it wrong.  Thanks for the clarification.

                  I think I'm having issues because I'm running pfsense inside a XenServer.  I'm going to try and turn off pv nics and see if I have any luck.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DerelictD Offline
                    Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                    last edited by

                    If you are experiencing horrible throughput through pfSense on Xen then turning off PV NICs will fix it. But PV NICs on Xen don't have altq so that will certainly be a problem. My Xen lab stack has PV nics disabled.

                    Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                    A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                    DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                    Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • F Offline
                      Flops
                      last edited by

                      I'm not having throughput problems currently -  but maybe I'll get some additional benefit from not running pv. My main goal is to actually be able to use qos.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DerelictD Offline
                        Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                        last edited by

                        You can't do altq shaping with Xen PV NICs period.

                        Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                        A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                        DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                        Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.