Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Via C7 1.5GHz vs AMD Geode 1.4GHz

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    14 Posts 5 Posters 13.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      Jantje
      last edited by

      I'm looking for some energy efficient and not too expensive hardware for a PFsense box. Currently I've deployed two boxes. One is a 4U Compaq dual P3 Xeon 700MHz server, the other is an IBM single dual core Opteron server. Both of them are huge power hogs(250+ and 130+ watt). All they do is load balance a couple of Internet connections without any P2P traffic and a handfull of VPN PPTP connections and they are performing excellent. The hardware for these two boxes was chosen because they're reliable.

      I'm paying the electricity bill for the third box so I'm looking for something else and came across the following two motherboards:
      Jetway J7F4 C7 1.5GHz J7F4K1G5 (12w)
      Jetway J7F3 AMD Geode NX1750 1.4GHz (14W)

      Since the onboard NICs of both motherboards aren't very good I'm thinking of putting in a D-Link DFE-580TX (4x 100Mbps, PCI) server card to help decrease CPU load. Both motherboards only have 1 PCI slot.

      I've been looking for benchmark for Geode vs C7 but haven't found anything usefull so far. As far as I can tell the Geode performs a lot better in multimedia tasks, but the Via C7 has a unit that accelerates VPN encryption.

      Are these boards fast enough for 2x 20mbit ADSL with heavy bittorrent traffic and traffic shaping? We won't be using any VPN connections.
      I have a slight preference for the Via C7 motherboard because it's mostly fitted with solid capitors where the Geode motherboard has mostly regular capacitors. But if the Via C7 isn't fast enough to easily cope with the expected load and the Geode is, then the choice is easy.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Cry HavokC
        Cry Havok
        last edited by

        My 1.2 GHz Via C7 box copes fine with a 20 Mb/s link.  I don't make massive use of torrents, but I did do lots of traffic shaping (I don't right now) and do run Squid, SquidGuard and various other bits.  Despite the use of Realtek nics, CPU load remains acceptable.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          Jantje
          last edited by

          That's nice to hear. It's been hard trying to find some decent references between Via C7 / Geode and more 'regular' desktop CPUs. As far as I can tell a 1.5GHz C7 should be about the aquivelent of a 1GHz P3.

          I did some more reading here on the forum and came across a pfsense presentation which stated the following Hardware Sizing Guidance:
          Throughput Considerations
          10-20 Mbps - No less than 266 MHz CPU
          21-50 Mbps - No less than 500 MHz CPU
          51-200 Mbps - No less than 1.0 GHz CPU
          201-500 Mbps - server class or newer desktop hardware
            PCI-x or PCI-e network adapters
            No less than 2.0 GHz CPU
          501+ Mbps - server class hardware
            PCI-x or PCI-e network adapters
            No less than 3.0 GHz CPU

          So a 1.5GHz C7 should do just fine for 2x 20mbit.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Cry HavokC
            Cry Havok
            last edited by

            The quality of the network cards matters a lot too - you can push more packets with an Intel Server card than an Intel desktop card, than a Realtek card (which means if you get the expensive cards, you can possibly get away with a lower spec CPU).

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              Jantje
              last edited by

              In that case maybe I should see if I can get my hands on one of these. Either that, or I could try putting in a decent 1-port server NIC and use a managed switch and give vlans a go. Although I'm not quite sure what that does performance wise.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                drees
                last edited by

                Either one should work just fine for the load you've got.

                Try the 1.2.1 snapshots if you're feeling daring - it's based on FreeBSD 7 (vs FreeBSD 6.2 that 1.2 is based on) and networking performance is much improved in FreeBSD 7.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Cry HavokC
                  Cry Havok
                  last edited by

                  @Jantje:

                  In that case maybe I should see if I can get my hands on one of these.

                  You'll get a lower bandwidth if your box doesn't have a PCI-X slot (though it'll still work).  The PCI slot has a bandwidth limit of 133 MB/s (just over 1 Gb/s).  That's enough for a single GBit adapter.  Newer PCI versions (2.2) increase that to an optional 266 MB/s (just over 2 Gb/s), but you need PCI-X for enough bandwidth for 4 x 1 Gb/s links.

                  Also known as - it's complicated, check your motherboard manual to see what it really supports ;)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    Jantje
                    last edited by

                    I've spotted a couple of these cards on ebay for not too much. And since with 2x 20mbit it'll have to push not much more then 80mbit through the PCI bus it shouldn't be a problem bandwidth wise.

                    Thanks for the reminder though. I read across this a little too fast the first time and thought it supported both PCI 1 and 2.2, instead of PCI-X 1.0 and PCI 2.2.

                    Supports 3.3 volt 64-bit PCI-X* 1.0 or PCI 2.2 buses

                    The jetway boards I'm looking at don't have a PCI 2.2 slot so I guess I'll have to look for a different NIC.

                    When I get the hardware I think I'll try out the new 1.2.1 snapshots. It's not a very mission critical system, and I'm all for trying new things ;)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Cry HavokC
                      Cry Havok
                      last edited by

                      I'd suggest a look at this MSI motherboard.  Not only does it have 3 onboard Intel based Gbit ports, but it has a PCI-E x16, a PCI-E x1 and a PCI slots (and takes a dual core processor).  From the Intel specification of the controller, it's a rev 2.3 PCI slot.

                      (I was looking at this when I thought my FX5620 was a brick)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        Jantje
                        last edited by

                        Thanks for the link. But I'm looking for an energy efficient solution that uses less then 30W.

                        So right now I'm considering a Jetway J7F4 C7 1.2GHz (7W) with 1GB DDR2 @400MHz a 60GB 2.5" SATA HDScorpio 8MB1pk(3W) and a D-Link DFE-580TX (3W)NIC. Together that should stay below 15W. Efficiency really drops for PSU's when you put too small of a load on them. So adding a standard PSU should keep it just below 30W if it manages around 50% effeciency, which sucks, but ok.

                        30W will cost me around €60,-/year and I think that's very acceptable.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Cry HavokC
                          Cry Havok
                          last edited by

                          Sub 150W, take a look at the picoPSU range, they do a 60W version.  You can find a review of the 120W version here.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • F
                            familyguy
                            last edited by

                            @Cry:

                            I'd suggest a look at this MSI motherboard.  Not only does it have 3 onboard Intel based Gbit ports, but it has a PCI-E x16, a PCI-E x1 and a PCI slots (and takes a dual core processor).  From the Intel specification of the controller, it's a rev 2.3 PCI slot.

                            (I was looking at this when I thought my FX5620 was a brick)

                            Has anyone actually tried one of these with pfsense?  Looks like a great choice for a "busy" firewall, especially for people doing lots of VPNs since you can stash a mobile core2duo in there.

                            Best,

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Cry HavokC
                              Cry Havok
                              last edited by

                              I haven't (just turned out to be bad RAM in my existing box so I didn't replace it), though if you can find anybody using it on FreeBSD 7.0 (which is what pfSense 1.2.1 is based on) or 6.2 (pfSense 1.2) then you'll know pfSense will work.  Certainly the key hardware items (such as the network interfaces) are on the supported hardware lists.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • R
                                rockbochs
                                last edited by

                                @familyguy:

                                @Cry:

                                I'd suggest a look at this MSI motherboard.  Not only does it have 3 onboard Intel based Gbit ports, but it has a PCI-E x16, a PCI-E x1 and a PCI slots (and takes a dual core processor).  From the Intel specification of the controller, it's a rev 2.3 PCI slot.

                                (I was looking at this when I thought my FX5620 was a brick)

                                Has anyone actually tried one of these with pfsense?  Looks like a great choice for a "busy" firewall, especially for people doing lots of VPNs since you can stash a mobile core2duo in there.

                                Best,

                                We build server appliances using these boards, but I would not recommend them if you're looking to utilize the pci-express slot.  It is a PEG slot ONLY.  Additionally, Intel is not making the Socket M processors anymore, so it's increasingly difficult to find them.

                                Creator of world class Linux/FreeBSD appliances, including the popular StrongBochs pfSense appliance.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.