Dhcp lease client hostname missing (with 2.3)
-
So far this works at my smaller office. I'm deploying the "fix" to a larger office for additional verification.
-
This workaround fixed my two installations as well :D. I'll reply to the dhcp-users mailing list and hopefully we can come up with a proper fix for the next version of isc-dhcpd.
-
I implemented that workaround for 2.3.2, since disabling the cache threshold won't have any impact on our users' use cases and it does appear to avoid the root cause problem.
Thanks for getting the ball rolling on that one Vynce, had I realized a workaround would have come that easily, I'd have done so some time ago.
-
Thanks Vynce for championing this effort with ISC.
Thanks cmb for incorporating this into the next version. I wasn't looking forward to remembering to patch this in manually after every upgrade. I wish you the best of luck for whatever is next for you.
-
Thanks Chris! I've opened a bug ticket in the isc-dhcp project to address the root issue: [ISC-Bugs #42849]. Their bug tracker appears to be closed to the public due to privacy concerns. Do we need to try and get some pfSense project email address added as a watcher? Not sure if you intend for the workaround to be reverted when the root issue is fixed…
-
Thanks Vynce. Once it's fixed, please start a new ticket at redmine.pfsense.org to revert that change, as it would be preferable to go back to the default there once it doesn't break other things.
-
Sounds good, will do.
-
Just a heads up that a patch for this issue has been committed to master in the isc-dhcp project and will be included in the isc-dhcp 4.3.5 beta. I will create a pfSense ticket to pull in isc-dhcp 4.3.5 final once it is released and revert Chris's workaround. I might try to build a pfSense-compatible dhcpd that includes this patch to verify the fix.
-
I upgraded to 2.3.2 but are still having this issue with some of my boxes. I run a proxmox (KVM / LXC ) hypervisor. While the KVM boxes keeps their hostname in the dhcp records. The LXC boxes loses it after a while.
Do i have to do anything to apply this fix to a upgraded system (2.3.2)?
-
You shouldn't have to do anything AFAIK. You can verify that the workaround is in place:
-
Diagnostics -> Edit File.
-
Paste "/var/dhcpd/etc/dhcpd.conf" in the box and click Load.
-
Verify that dhcp-cache-threshold 0; is listed in the file.
-
-
isc-dhcp 4.3.5 was released today and includes the fix for this issue. I've opened a new bug ticket to track upgrading to 4.3.5 and revert the workaround that Chris added.
-
The workaround does not seem to be working for DHCPv6.
I verified that the workaround is in place in /etc/inc/services.inc . It appeared in 2 locations in the file.
Clients are ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS and 16.04 LTS.
On this version:
2.3.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
built on Tue Sep 27 12:13:07 CDT 2016
FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p9 -
@rsq:
The workaround does not seem to be working for DHCPv6.
In DHCPv6, the client does not provide its hostname to the DHCP server. The only form of identification is the DUID, a unique identifier that is generated by the operating system when the computer is set up. The only way a hostname is present under DHCPv6 is if it's a static entry, where you can enter a hostname yourself.
-
I am on 2.3.3-p1 and have issues with missing hostnames.
Found this threat and checked if dhcp.conf has the "dhcp-cache-threshold 0;" and it doesn't.
Is this still needed or should this be fixed without the workaround?
-
The workaround is no longer needed since the root issue was fixed in isc-dhcp 4.3.5, which is included in pfSense 2.3.3. That's not to say there isn't some other issue causing missing hostnames, but I haven't seen a regression of this specific issue in pfSense 2.3.3.
