504 Gateway Time-out (nginx) - 2.3 upgrade on 2x APU1
-
I tried that thing with uncheck updates - didn't work. After some days the http request timed out because ngin didn't respond
-
There was a problem with the IPsec widget a while back. If you have that on the dashboard then try to remove it.
-
bump
Setup :
- 2.3.2-RELEASE-p1 (i386)
- 2013 ALIX Engine
- 4G NanoBSD
- bare install, no-addons
I have been trying to taccle down similar issues as those mentionned in this topic :
-
nginx timeouts ( 504, 502 … ) or slowness
-
nginx timeouts in syslog
-
traffic still going trough, only the UI is impacted
My appliance is coupled w/ a 100Mbps DSL line ( which is well below the maximum troughput it can handle ), and I started noticying that the nginx issues were happening at high troughput ( >= 90Mbps ).
I disabled traffic shaping at first ( as it can be quite CPU intensive ), but it didn't change the behaviour.
The moment the troughput drops to values like 20Mbps, the UI becomes responsive again ( no slowness, no timeouts ).
What can I do to solve these problems ? :-\
-
bump
..Alix..
What can I do to solve these problems ?Bump in place ?
First off: Install a fast/excellent CF like a Transcend Industrial grade.
Then start with a 2.3 from scratch i.s.o. upgrading from a 2.2
Set the CF to read/write all the time.
2.3 works fine with an Alix. -
@hda:
First off: Install a fast/excellent CF like a Transcend Industrial grade.
Then start with a 2.3 from scratch i.s.o. upgrading from a 2.2
Set the CF to read/write all the time.
2.3 works fine with an Alix.- SLC SD card w/ high i/o installed
- last "from scratch" install was done on the initial 2.3 release ( and it's irrelevant since the NanoBSD upgrade procedure is equivalent to an initial install w/ config copy only )
- RW mode enabled ( it's now a NanoBSD default setting )
-
I started noticying that the nginx issues were happening at high troughput ( >= 90Mbps ).
I disabled traffic shaping at first ( as it can be quite CPU intensive ), but it didn't change the behaviour.
The moment the troughput drops to values like 20Mbps, the UI becomes responsive again ( no slowness, no timeouts ).What can I do to solve these problems ? :-\
Get an adequate hardware to handle the load. These things are simply EOL. Having issues even when updating due to lack of RAM, especially if you hit some bigger package update (python, perl comes to mind.)
-
The moment the troughput drops to values like 20Mbps, the UI becomes responsive again ( no slowness, no timeouts ).
What can I do to solve these problems ? :-\So if the load is too high, which it is, and you want to keep the Alix, you could then restrict your 100-line to 50 or 25 with a managed switch.
-
These things are simply EOL. Having issues even when updating due to lack of RAM, especially if you hit some bigger package update (python, perl comes to mind.)
EOL ?! :o
These ALIX appliances are still being sold and are rated for a 250Mbp/s Firewall throughput, which, if I'm right, should be more than enough for what I do with it ???
EDIT : looking carefully @ the specs, I noticed that, while the FW t.p. is rated at 250Mbp/s, the port-to-port t.p. is rated at 85Mbp/s, so that might be a clue indeed ( altough I don't fully understand what it means compared to the FW t.p. )
-
These things are simply EOL. Having issues even when updating due to lack of RAM, especially if you hit some bigger package update (python, perl comes to mind.)
EOL ?! :o
Yeah, these are certainly EOLed as far as pfSense is concerned (together with rest of x86 arch). x86 is gone with 2.4. I mean, recycle them to run LEDE/OpenWrt or something similar on it and they can keep running for lot more years, but pfSense/FreeBSD is getting a pain to run on these.
-
These things are simply EOL. Having issues even when updating due to lack of RAM, especially if you hit some bigger package update (python, perl comes to mind.)
EOL ?! :o
Yeah, these are certainly EOLed as far as pfSense is concerned (together with rest of x86 arch). x86 is gone with 2.4. I mean, recycle them to run LEDE/OpenWrt or something similar on it and they can keep running for lot more years, but pfSense/FreeBSD is getting a pain to run on these.
For details of will no longer be supported from 2.4 onwards: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=121255.0
