• Nat behind nat

    Locked
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    J

    UPDATE

    when i add a static route to my machine (172.20.0.179) to the 172.18.x.x network everything is working fine.

    So i think it has something to do with our nokia checkpoint.

    Something like asynchronous routing?

    Because traffic flows from the 172.18.x.x directly into the 172.20.x.x network and from the 172.20.x.x network it goes first through a nokia checkpoint and then back to the pfsense firewall?

    See my brilliant paint for more explanation  ;D

    ![routing issue.JPG](/public/imported_attachments/1/routing issue.JPG)
    ![routing issue.JPG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/routing issue.JPG_thumb)

  • [SOLVED]:VPN traffic problem due to private (LAN) IP

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • MOVED: FTP Setup for 2.0-BETA4

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Nat works on one port, and not on another port, completely baffled :-/

    Locked
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    3k Views
    F

    I've tried without aliases as well, the camera's CAN use RTP, but in this case, it's RTPoverHTTP as they call it.
    I've tried using an SSH-tunnel (I have an NAT that actually works, SSH to my NAS), and forwarded just port 80 through that, and that works for all the cameras.

  • Redirect web traffic to a proxy server

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    Cry HavokC

    Yes - you should find a few threads about this since it's been covered before.

    Effectively you're setting up a remote transparent proxy.  Just ensure that you exclude the proxy itself from this, otherwise traffic will go around in circles ;)

  • MOVED: NAT a OpenVPN

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • NAT exemption

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    N

    I had already tried it, but changed it again.

    Then, from an internal machine, I try to access DMZ (which is also WAN for pfsense) but it still translates.

    One thing I noted, if I run "pfctl -s all" I can not see this rule. It appears it doesn't get applied.

    Since I am away, I will not try a reboot now  :P, but do you think this may be it?

    Is there a command line version of this so that I can try "manually"?

    Thank you again

  • Half my rules working, half not

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    R

    @jimp:

    Upstream equipment probably had the MAC addresses of the old box in its ARP cache.

    Interesting, let me check on that.  I need to replace that firewall and am not having a great experience with it.

  • Additional WAN IP rules problem

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    4k Views
    No one has replied
  • Primary NAT/DHCP'd IP

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    S

    This seems to have worked!

    Thanks for the head up, it is very appreciated!

  • EMule for all

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    I

    hi GruensFroeschli,
    thanks for your reply I will try to use upnp otherwise i must change the port for any client.

    inferenza

  • Newbie questions on Remote Desktop and Hostname

    Locked
    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    6k Views
    S

    The problem seem to be with the VOIP provider. Got it working after I made a call to the their tech support.

    Thanks Cry Havok and kpa for your help.
    To answer your questions I have "any" set for the external address.
    Also yes the 8x8 box has IP 192.168.1.201, with a netmask of 255.255.255.0.

    Thanks a lot,
    Sai

  • MOVED: NAT to VPN IPSec

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Centralize the admin authentications

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    jimpJ

    In 2.0 you can use RADIUS or LDAP as an authentication source for the GUI.

  • Replace an existing firewall (transparent)

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    G

    Problem solved…
    It was a rule problem, in that when I switched from wan network to any (source network)all is gone in the right way.

  • How to remove NAT rule from console

    Locked
    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    10k Views
    jimpJ

    edit the config, rm /tmp/config.cache, then run /etc/rc.filter_configure

  • Simple NAT 1:1

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Torrents UpNp vs Port Forward

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    4k Views
    B

    Firstly, if you put the torrent box on a dmz nic, then you don't have to worry about any issues with the linksys wireless router.

    Secondly, I like to keep my wireless traffic separate from my wired.  That way I can handle it differently if I want, and if someone manages to crack my encryption, they can't get to my wired machines.

    Thirdly, if the torrent box is on it's own nic, then you know exactly what it's doing, and don't have any extraneous traffic to deal with.

  • FTP Server behind pfSense - purpose of CARP IP?

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    4k Views
    J

    On my setup, simply port forwarding is all I needed to do. I did it with a P-ARP VIP since my primary IP is done by DHCP.

    Since the ports are forwarded, and it seems to me you don't have extra IPs (or aren't trying to use anything but the primary IP), you don't need any CARPs.

  • Ports SMTP, IMAP, POP3

    Locked
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    9k Views
    B

    It was my mal server…. pfsense is the ballz

Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.