TNSR

• 

  TNSR Resources
  • dennis_s  

  1
  1
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  574
  Views

  No one has replied

• 

  This topic is deleted!
  • ivor  

  1
  1
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  568
  Views

  No one has replied

• J

  TNSR with ESXI VMXNET3 -- not recognized
  • jantypas  

  6
  0
  Votes
  6
  Posts
  341
  Views

  D

  @MainPr0 Still not taking
• D

  TNSR on ESXi 6.7u3 PCI passthrough BLANK after adding to dataplane dpdk dev 0000:0b:00.0 network
  • Dsploitar  

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  34
  Views

  D

  Changing the OS Guest version to CentOS 7 64bit made the Virtual Adapter visible, but as you can see here, the PCI passthrough is not taking...
• M

  This topic is deleted!
  • manifestinvestment4  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  16
  Views

  No one has replied

• 

  This topic is deleted!
  • hayulegot  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  2
  Views

  No one has replied

• E

  This topic is deleted!
  • exerciseskneepain66  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  8
  Views

  No one has replied

• 

  This topic is deleted!
  • developers  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  7
  Views

  No one has replied

• L

  X722
  • LeeR  

  3
  0
  Votes
  3
  Posts
  112
  Views

  L

  @dennis_s It's in my original post. Scroll down the code section.
• T

  This topic is deleted!
  • Themiss  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  17
  Views

  No one has replied

• M

  This topic is deleted!
  • mepong  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  11
  Views

  No one has replied

• M

  This topic is deleted!
  • mepong  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  6
  Views

  No one has replied

• D

  XG-1541 with TNSR Results with 10GB + connection
  • danlebaron  

  5
  0
  Votes
  5
  Posts
  272
  Views

  

  I would complete the form here and see about a trial: https://www.tnsr.com/trials tnsr could excel in that application. And I agree. Data in flight is no longer private. Especially through a third party.
• D

  This topic is deleted!
  • davidbrownmania  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  10
  Views

  No one has replied

• A

  This topic is deleted!
  • ayurvedaretreat  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  6
  Views

  No one has replied

• F

  This topic is deleted!
  • fergusonmu023  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  6
  Views

  No one has replied

• K

  This topic is deleted!
  • kirbyL  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  5
  Views

  No one has replied

• A

  This topic is deleted!
  • ArmUziman  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  5
  Views

  No one has replied

• C

  TNSR ECMP Algorithms?
  • cmooney  

  5
  0
  Votes
  5
  Posts
  157
  Views

  C

  How do you mean round-robin? Per-packet round robin?
• 

  This topic is deleted!
  • ariairannovinclinic  

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  7
  Views
• V

  Timeline on TNSR for XG-7100? (And will SG-3100 ever get TNSR?)
  • victorhooi  

  6
  0
  Votes
  6
  Posts
  574
  Views

  

  Hi @victorhooi Still no ETA for TNSR on the 7100, however, the engineers are aware of the ask and soon as it gets added we'll make an announcement on the forum.
• L

  dataplane heap sizes
  • LeeR  

  5
  0
  Votes
  5
  Posts
  191
  Views

  

  dataplane ip heap-size 4G dataplane ip6 heap-size 2G should be more than plenty.
• L

  OSPF & OSPFv3 Roadmap
  • LeeR  

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  154
  Views

  

  @LeeR said in OSPF & OSPFv3 Roadmap: Is OSPF & OSPFv3 on the roadmap? Any ETA? The current plan is for both to be in the next release. OSPFv2 for sure. OSPFv3 is still under development. Would it be safe to configure OSPF on FRR directly until is has been abstracted in the TNSR CLI? Or would the config get overwritten on a reload/reboot? I wouldn't count on the config files being left alone. In theory since the current release doesn't touch ospfd.conf it may be OK, but if you make any changes in zebra.conf they would definitely be clobbered.
• L

  Add IPv6 network to BGP address-family
  • LeeR  

  3
  0
  Votes
  3
  Posts
  156
  Views

  L

  Indeed it was. Thought I could install via the non-trial ISO on top of the trial install. Was expecting it to wipe the partitions and start over but apparently did not. Did the package upgrade to 19.05 and the CLI took the command as expected.
• N

  This topic is deleted!
  • nick14595  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  17
  Views

  No one has replied

• R

  Issue after setting dataplane workers 1>
  • RobertG  

  18
  0
  Votes
  18
  Posts
  449
  Views

  R

  Thank you @jimp . I'll just wait for a reaction :)
• J

  This topic is deleted!
  • jantypas  

  0
  0
  Votes
  0
  Posts
  38
  Views

  No one has replied

• R

  License model for X710 when using 10gE
  • RobertG  

  3
  0
  Votes
  3
  Posts
  267
  Views

  

  Hi @RobertG Yes, in the current licensing model, you can use TNSR Business (up to 10Gbps of throughput) on a system with faster interface, but will only get 10Gbps of throughput. In the future, there may be technical limitations in the product that cause TNSR Business to not initialize interfaces that are capable of exceeding 10Gbps throughput, so please be aware... We're interested in customer feedback on the best way to handle this, but have not yet landed on a final model for engineering reasons.
• V

  Any advantage to TNSR on slow WAN connections? (e.g. 100 Mbps)
  • victorhooi  

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  296
  Views

  

  Hi @victorhooi, I think I just replied to you on Reddit as well. Advantage to TNSR in 100Mbps scenario. The first thing that comes to mind is programmability. If you're using this in a home lab, that might not be a big deal, but in a DevOps or distributed environment, TNSR's API will help you automate. As you said, SaltStack, Ansible, and other frameworks are great ways to wrap policy or updates into code. ...no Web GUI at the moment. That's true, but the reason we started with an API is so TNSR can be easily extended. That could mean a GUI in the future, but for right now we've worked with partners who use TNSR via the API to extend their own products. For example, Fidelis Networks uses TNSR to mirror traffic for inspection in AWS. Will packages such as nTopNG be available for TNSR? I don't know if that package specifically will be available, but extensibility was central to the design of TNSR. Here's an example of how TNSR can work with Snort: https://github.com/Netgate/TNSR_IDS You can probably see how this architecture would be really beneficial once bandwidth exceeds a couple of Gbps. With TNSR+Snort, routing and traffic inspection won't end up competing for CPU resources so you can scale them independently. If nothing else, grab a TNSR trial and run it your lab environment.
• J

  This topic is deleted!
  • Jessica007  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  7
  Views

  No one has replied

• 

  Netgate Academy Instructional Video: Configuring a TNSR Interface
  • dennis_s  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  129
  Views

  No one has replied

• L

  10Gbit interface shown as "Link up, 10 Mbit/sec, full duplex"
  • LeeR  

  6
  0
  Votes
  6
  Posts
  213
  Views

  L

  Sounds good. Thanks for the update.
• T

  Demo License for TSNR
  • thesurf  

  6
  0
  Votes
  6
  Posts
  1517
  Views

  

  Yup, you can trial it in your lab now: https://www.tnsr.com/tnsr-business-trial-page Or I guess it depends exactly what you mean by demo license. Steve
• 

  TNSR Zero-to-Ping
  • dennis_s  

  1
  1
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  124
  Views

  No one has replied

• C

  1 Core is permanent at 100% - vpp_main process
  • c_cloud  

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  319
  Views

  

  Yes, that's expected. DPDKs polling mode driver does that. Steve
• 

  TNSR on Netgate’s SG-5100, XG-1537, and XG-1541!
  • ivor  

  4
  1
  Votes
  4
  Posts
  1986
  Views

  

  @gfeiner No TNSR support for 7100 right now, but it's on our to-do list.
• 

  TNSR on SG-5100?
  • luckman212  

  6
  0
  Votes
  6
  Posts
  1055
  Views

  

  You're welcome. Once you test out TNSR, please share your experiences. Thank you!
• 8

  TNSR and NAT
  • 80211WiGuy  

  6
  2
  Votes
  6
  Posts
  1121
  Views

  8

  @jwt oops
• M

  TNSR relation to SCLR
  nat tnsr sclr cpe • • magebarf  

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  851
  Views

  

  Hello! Thank you for your interest in TNSR and SCLR. My intermediate step, until consumer equipment actually is getting near solving the throughput challenges with 10gbps, is to build/buy a setup similar to the XG-7100 (great thing with the desktop chassis model!) or the XG-1541, and set it up as a software router. pfSense will probably be my base configuration, in a virtualized setup allowing me to do background configuration of more experimental setups which I switch in and out of active duty, until I see a good setup where I'm getting stable routing for closer to (if not fully saturating) the 10gbps line. The current plan is to make TNSR available on all XG series (desktop and rack mount). I know you're preparing TNSR for on premise configurations, but depending on how the setup is between TNSR and SCLR, do you have any plan on some "beta" or license transition where users who may fit the SCLR use case down the road may help/try out TNSR while slowly moving towards the target of having a SCLR setup running? Great questions, unfortunately I cannot answer them right now because SCLR is under development. I would be happy to follow up with you once more information is available for public. My apologies for not being able to provide better answers today.
• R

  Recommended hardware (on-premise)
  • robinjames  

  4
  0
  Votes
  4
  Posts
  1465
  Views

  

  The current plan is to make TNSR available on all XG series (desktop and rack mount). So yes, that would include the XG-7100. Availability dates are TBD, but enabling customers to fully leverage their appliance investment via high performance packet processing software (TNSR) is a growing part of our business. Let me know if you have any other questions.