1. Home
  2. TNSR

Subcategories

  • Discussions about TNSR

    16 Topics
    54 Posts
    M
    We're happy to announce the release of TNSR software version 25.02. This regularly scheduled release includes additional hardware support, updates, and bug fixes. Here's what's new: Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding: Introducing Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) to prevent IP spoofing attacks. Both "loose" and "strict" modes available. Enhanced BGP Protection: New BGP Roles implementation (RFC 9234) to prevent route leaks and hijacks. Powerful Threat Detection: Multi-threaded Snort 3 integration for advanced IDS/IPS. NETCONF: The NETCONF service has been made available starting with this release. Regular Updates and Maintenance: Updated VPP and DPDK versions and made over 30 bug fixes and stability enhancements. Learn More: Release Notes Blog Video

  • Discussions about TNSR

    61 Topics
    134 Posts
    JonathanLeeJ
    @johnpoz I know I thought maybe he could be my study buddy for a while but never responded so I gave up .

  • Discussions about installing or upgrading TNSR software

    52 Topics
    191 Posts
    A
    @Said.Fathy , Hi Said .. I'd strongly recommend Lawrence Systems' youtube channel... it's the best as far as pfsense is concerned.. from beginner to pro https://www.youtube.com/@LAWRENCESYSTEMS
Log in to post
Load new posts
  • J

    MTU issues

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    436 Views
    J
    @Derelict Ok, thank you for the feedback. Will change the NIC's for now.
  • D

    "ip nat outside" on interface with BGP neighbor

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    467 Views
    DerelictD
    Yes, we are tracking that. It looks like there is a problem there.
  • G

    ARM64 hardware

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    454 Views
    audianA
    @graphine thanks for reaching out. We don't have near-term plans for TNSR on ARM.
  • N

    no bgp default ipv4-unicast

    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    840 Views
    audianA
    @NetFreak said in no bgp default ipv4-unicast: 4399 Thanks Joey, the original request is still on our backlog, no roadmap ETA at the moment though.
  • S

    Test TNSR

    6
    3
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    audianA
    @sadekyo1712 - Thanks, look forward to your updates
  • E

    state sync?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    680 Views
    E
    use case I'm looking at is using tnsr for a ha perimeter firewall deployment (including destination nat port forwarding and outbound nat masquerading). so keeping the nat state table in sync between router instances definitely a concern. Can you use regular Linux Contrack to keep the tables in sync? on regular centos/ubuntu/etc you can use this: https://conntrack-tools.netfilter.org/manual.html.
  • M

    VRRP not setting mac address on vmxnet3 dpdk_add_del_mac_address: mac address add/del failed: -95

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    N
    @mski your type of vnic driver is just not compatible with it. Check this out for more info: https://docs.netgate.com/tnsr/en/latest/vrrp/compatibility.html Afaik VMware is also capable of the intel e1000 vnic which uses the igb driver. Joey
  • P

    Cannot add IPv6 /128 loopback

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    478 Views
    N
    Had the same issue some month ago. In some cases it can be usefull to have IP space overlapping on multiple interfaces. For example if you have a routed /24 which is bound to a loopback interfaces to prevent l3 loops while only having a smaller subnet assigned to a different interface. eg: 185.121.69.0/24 dev lo 185.121.69.0/26 dev eth0.502 ... However, the developer of TNSR are aware of this, I had a evaluation meeting longer ago where I explained this issue to them.
  • Ç

    This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    4 Views
    No one has replied
  • N

    This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    8 Views
    No one has replied
  • N

    Is TNSR meant to eventually replace pfsense?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    518 Views
    jimpJ
    They are geared for two very (very) different markets and there isn't likely to be huge overlap between their intended customer bases. I'm vastly oversimplifying it but the tl;dr version is that TNSR is focused on high performance routing and VPN transit, for example, where the architecture of pfSense can't keep up. While pfSense has more flexibility with packages and firewall-type features which don't necessarily require >10GBit/s performance.
  • ?

    Hello! I'm about to test TNSR

    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    589 Views
    audianA
    @kiokoman Thanks for your curiosity :)
  • E

    IPSEC Diagnostics and logging

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    641 Views
    DerelictD
    You can set asymmetric PSKs in tnsr too.
  • S

    This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    4 Views
    No one has replied
  • M

    This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    7 Views
    No one has replied
  • T

    This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    4 Views
    No one has replied
  • D

    This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    60 Views
    No one has replied
  • K

    This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    5 Views
    No one has replied
  • G

    TNSR on Google Fiber?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    963 Views
    G
    Thanks for the response and the information Jim!
  • V

    Timeline on TNSR for XG-7100? (And will SG-3100 ever get TNSR?)

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    audianA
    @nevinsm - What kind of throughput are you getting?
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.