Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    ZFS install

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    16 Posts 8 Posters 1.8k Views 9 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • johnpozJ Online
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @jc1976
      last edited by johnpoz

      @jc1976 that doesn't seem right.. What version exactly did you install?

      I did clean a while back for zfs on 21.05, and then did upgrade to 21.05.1

      This is what I show

      zfs.jpg

      The duplicate listings don't seem right to me.

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J Offline
        jc1976
        last edited by

        the latest stable download of pfsense. it's a fresh install

        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ Online
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @jc1976
          last edited by

          @jc1976 said in ZFS install:

          the latest stable download of pfsense. it's a fresh install

          So I take it CE.. 2.52

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • AndyRHA Offline
            AndyRH
            last edited by

            Mixed results:
            2.5.1 CE I have 5 file systems
            21.05.1 Plus I have 12 file systems

            Does that mean my 21.05.1 system needs to be rebuilt?

            o||||o
            7100-1u

            johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ Online
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @AndyRH
              last edited by johnpoz

              Your seeing dupes as well? That doesn't make much sense.. If I find time in the morning will do a install on a VM with zfs.. But headed out for 4 day weekend, so not sure if will get time.

              edit: Ok figured just do it now - doesn't take long, did a clean install 2.5.2 just accept all the defaults which zfs is now default. And this is what I got.. No dupes.. I knew they were going to make some changes to the layout.. But was just going to wait for my install til 21.09

              defaultzfs.jpg

              So not sure why you have those dupe /var ufs in ram? Notice mine are all /var/something and not in ram.. Only /var/run is UFS in ram - did not do the guided zfs install?

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

              P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P Offline
                Patch @johnpoz
                last edited by Patch

                @johnpoz same number of entries, but showing half the label.

                I suspect a html display field size issue with narrow windows

                @johnpoz said in ZFS install:

                So not sure why you have those dupe /var ufs in ram

                ram disk option has been enable

                JeGrJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • JeGrJ Offline
                  JeGr LAYER 8 Moderator @Patch
                  last edited by

                  @patch said in ZFS install:

                  I suspect a html display field size issue with narrow windows

                  I'm more likely to belive that is the culprit

                  ram disk option has been enable

                  Besides I don't see the point of RAM disks in these times were we have 120++ SSD sizes per default in those boxes, but I assume the different /var paths will get merged to the same tmpfs destination on the RAMdisk and the HTML widget just reads/displays them "wrong" as a tmpfs will show slightly different output then a normal mount. So merely a display / enabled RAM disk error than a partition/installation problem I guess.

                  That aside and just curious myself: why use a RAM disk? The OP @jc1976 writes about a 240GB(!) SSD that is WAY enough for all things you could do on pfSense as the install is around 2GB installed. So even with logging, space shouldn't be an issue. And if you only write to about ~10% of an SSD, modern SSDs have great wear leveling and will almost never cease working in that scenario. I have boxes with SSDs ~120GB in size at customer locations, that run with a bit more logging for more than 7y already and never had a drive fault at all.

                  So if it's a cautionary measure to help your SSD survive longer - don't sweat it. If you don't fill it for more than ~80% regularly the MTBF should be more than enough :)

                  Cheers
                  \jens

                  Don't forget to upvote ๐Ÿ‘ those who kindly offered their time and brainpower to help you!

                  If you're interested, I'm available to discuss details of German-speaking paid support (for companies) if needed.

                  P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P Offline
                    Patch @JeGr
                    last edited by Patch

                    Maybe a system information widget display bug but as this commit Removes disk usage from system information widget, the fix is going to be wait for v2.6

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • jimpJ Offline
                      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                      last edited by

                      The reason you see lots of entries in general is because of ZFS datasets.

                      The reason you see lots of apparently duplicate entries is due to a df bug that happens when using RAM disks on a ZFS install: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/12144

                      The new disk widget works around that particular bug in a different way than the Redmine linked above.

                      Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                      Do not Chat/PM for help!

                      R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • R Offline
                        Ramosel @jimp
                        last edited by

                        @jimp said in ZFS install:

                        The reason you see lots of entries in general is because of ZFS datasets.

                        The reason you see lots of apparently duplicate entries is due to a df bug that happens when using RAM disks on a ZFS install: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/12144

                        The new disk widget works around that particular bug in a different way than the Redmine linked above.

                        Jim, by "new disk widget" are you talking about something beyond 21.05.1? I just picked up a new (to me) SG-4860 and did a ZFS install of 21.05.1 and got the full 13 directory listing as above?

                        Can I infer from your comment that removing the ramdisk will mitigate this problem?
                        If so, what is the best practice for removing/not creating a ramdisk during install? I rarely see usage of over 20% of the physical memory on my 4860 in service anyway.

                        Rick

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S Offline
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          Yes, it's in snapshots now:

                          Screenshot from 2021-10-11 19-04-29.png

                          Yes you would not see the dupe /var entries if you disable ramdisks.
                          They are enabled in Sys > Adv > Misc. You can just uncheck the box there to disable them again. Ramdisks are not enabled by default.

                          Steve

                          R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • R Offline
                            Ramosel @stephenw10
                            last edited by

                            @stephenw10 said in ZFS install:

                            Yes, it's in snapshots now:

                            Yes you would not see the dupe /var entries if you disable ramdisks.
                            They are enabled in Sys > Adv > Misc. You can just uncheck the box there to disable them again. Ramdisks are not enabled by default.

                            Thanks Steve (and thanks for help with the other issue on a ticket)
                            I guess I'm just not getting something here. After reading John's success story on 21.05 ZFS build, then upgrading to 21.05.1, I decided to give that a try this evening. So, I've now done fresh installs on this SG-4860 using both 21.05 and 25.05.1. Using the guided ZFS build and making no other changes in the install.
                            I always get the 13 directory listing under Disk Usage. I've confirmed there is no ramdisk selected on either build. Other than running the ZFS items, there are no other changes being done to the guided fresh install. Once up, I go to the LAN, complete the GUI interface (9)setup steps and the directories are there.

                            So, do I just wait until the next release before committing this new box or is there something I can do during install?

                            Thanks,
                            Rick

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S Offline
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by stephenw10

                              You should have multiple entries there for the mount points ZFS uses. What you should not have is multiple duplicate entries like we see in the first ports here, all shown as /var.
                              But both are cosmetic only, the install is correct like that and should not have any issues.

                              Steve

                              R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • R Offline
                                Ramosel @stephenw10
                                last edited by

                                @stephenw10 said in ZFS install:

                                But both are cosmetic only, the install is correct like that and should not have any issues.

                                Steve

                                My misunderstanding. Thanks for clarifying what I was seeing vs. what I expected. I Bozo'd that one.

                                Although, it would be nice to have a toggle on the "System Information" widget setting to show full mount points or general disk usage. The full mount points is going to run this widget off screen on even the biggest monitors. But, being able to see which mount point is filling up is a great diagnostic. Just a thought.

                                Thanks again for your time.
                                Rick

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stephenw10S Offline
                                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                  last edited by stephenw10

                                  The new disks widget in current snapshots (shown above) has all that goodness. ๐Ÿ˜

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.