Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    How to set ip range on LAN same as WAN range ip

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    16 Posts 4 Posters 1.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      pflover @stephenw10
      last edited by

      @stephenw10
      i have pfsense with ip address: 86.25.32.21
      and my server is : 86.25.32.23
      and gateways of pfsense and server is : 86.25.32.20
      i have LAN interface on pfsense that when i trying to set ip 86.25.32.25 i get this error :
      IPv4 address 86.25.32.25/32 is being used by or overlaps with: WAN (86.25.32.21/28)

      i have this problem.
      my purpose is my server can not connect to internet directly and only can connect to internet through pfsense.
      please help me

      V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • V
        viragomann @pflover
        last edited by

        @pflover said in How to set ip range on LAN same as WAN range ip:

        i have LAN interface on pfsense that when i trying to set ip 86.25.32.25 i get this error :
        IPv4 address 86.25.32.25/32 is being used by or overlaps with: WAN (86.25.32.21/28)

        That might be true. 86.25.32.25 is part of the WAN network 86.25.32.21/28, so you cannot use this IP on LAN.

        The only option to use a public IP out out of the WAN network behind pfSense is bridging the interface as described in the docs.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          Yup, that^. In that situation you can only use bridged interfaces.

          johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • johnpozJ
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @stephenw10
            last edited by

            Bridging is not the only way - he could just nat it and use a vip for whatever public IP he wants to use and either port forward the specific ports he needs or 1:1 nat

            Which would be far easier and less complex setup than a bridge - and less likely for a security screw up if using port forwards.

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              Yup that's true if the server doesn't require a public IP directly.
              I'd thought it did but reading back now it's not clear.

              johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • johnpozJ
                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @stephenw10
                last edited by

                @stephenw10 said in How to set ip range on LAN same as WAN range ip:

                server doesn't require a public IP directly.

                It would be a very odd scenario where it HAD to be public.. Like some license hard locked to having to see public IP? I really can not think of a scenario that it wouldn't be better to just nat..

                Unless there is a specific reason that public IP on the device is required - which can not think of.. Something needed with L2 from the isp maybe? Doubtful.

                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  Unfortunately it's something we see quite often. Some server/application that will only use it's local IP with no way to be configured for an external public IP or detect it automatically.
                  I agree, it shouldn't ever happen in 2021 but....

                  johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • johnpozJ
                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10 You mean like a ftp server handing out its IP to connect to via passive?

                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                    SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      Yup, exactly like that. PBXs are also relatively common. Other more obscure appliances etc.

                      johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • johnpozJ
                        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @stephenw10
                        last edited by

                        @stephenw10 that is just SAD at so many levels.

                        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.