iperf3 testing 500/40 connection: 33mpbs
-
@johnpoz
Absolutely not. Here is the ping output from the client:PING 192.168.60.104 (192.168.60.104): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.60.104: icmp_seq=0 ttl=63 time=23.135 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.60.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=18.199 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.60.104: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=19.572 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.60.104: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=18.876 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.60.104: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=21.045 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.60.104: icmp_seq=5 ttl=63 time=30.158 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.60.104: icmp_seq=6 ttl=63 time=79.055 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.60.104: icmp_seq=7 ttl=63 time=121.190 ms ^C --- 192.168.60.104 ping statistics --- 8 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 18.199/41.404/121.190/35.673 msIs this latency to be considered higher than average?
Pete
-
What latency do you see outside the tunnel?
-
@stephenw10 good question. This my home connection (the pfSense SG-1100):
Does this give you any clue?The other node is the fibre 200/200 connection of my friend. He has a UniFi USG. I will ask him about his normal WAN latency.
Pete
-
Not really, you'd have to ping between the public IPs directly outside the VPN.
-
@stephenw10
This is the iperf3 output, default options + -t 40Connecting to host 192.168.60.104, port 5201 [ 4] local 172.16.120.2 port 51753 connected to 192.168.60.104 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 872 KBytes 7.14 Mbits/sec [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.56 MBytes 13.1 Mbits/sec [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 3.10 MBytes 26.0 Mbits/sec [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 4.11 MBytes 34.5 Mbits/sec [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 5.04 MBytes 42.3 Mbits/sec [ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 3.98 MBytes 33.4 Mbits/sec [ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 4.76 MBytes 39.9 Mbits/sec [ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 3.58 MBytes 30.0 Mbits/sec [ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 4.25 MBytes 35.7 Mbits/sec [ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 4.71 MBytes 39.5 Mbits/sec [ 4] 10.00-11.00 sec 4.27 MBytes 35.8 Mbits/sec [ 4] 11.00-12.00 sec 4.93 MBytes 41.4 Mbits/sec [ 4] 12.00-13.00 sec 4.39 MBytes 36.8 Mbits/sec [ 4] 13.00-14.00 sec 3.74 MBytes 31.4 Mbits/sec [ 4] 14.00-15.00 sec 4.72 MBytes 39.6 Mbits/sec [ 4] 15.00-16.00 sec 3.94 MBytes 33.1 Mbits/sec [ 4] 16.00-17.00 sec 4.21 MBytes 35.3 Mbits/sec [ 4] 17.00-18.00 sec 4.08 MBytes 34.3 Mbits/sec [ 4] 18.00-19.00 sec 4.05 MBytes 34.0 Mbits/sec [ 4] 19.00-20.00 sec 3.68 MBytes 30.9 Mbits/sec [ 4] 20.00-21.00 sec 3.30 MBytes 27.7 Mbits/sec [ 4] 21.00-22.00 sec 4.85 MBytes 40.6 Mbits/sec [ 4] 22.00-23.00 sec 3.86 MBytes 32.4 Mbits/sec [ 4] 23.00-24.00 sec 4.45 MBytes 37.3 Mbits/sec [ 4] 24.00-25.00 sec 4.20 MBytes 35.2 Mbits/sec [ 4] 25.00-26.00 sec 3.68 MBytes 30.9 Mbits/sec [ 4] 26.00-27.00 sec 4.56 MBytes 38.3 Mbits/sec [ 4] 27.00-28.00 sec 4.17 MBytes 35.0 Mbits/sec [ 4] 28.00-29.00 sec 3.78 MBytes 31.7 Mbits/sec [ 4] 29.00-30.00 sec 4.62 MBytes 38.7 Mbits/sec [ 4] 30.00-31.00 sec 2.51 MBytes 21.0 Mbits/sec [ 4] 31.00-32.00 sec 4.07 MBytes 34.1 Mbits/sec [ 4] 32.00-33.00 sec 3.76 MBytes 31.5 Mbits/sec [ 4] 33.00-34.00 sec 4.40 MBytes 36.9 Mbits/sec [ 4] 34.00-35.00 sec 4.52 MBytes 38.0 Mbits/sec [ 4] 35.00-36.00 sec 4.11 MBytes 34.4 Mbits/sec [ 4] 36.00-37.00 sec 4.25 MBytes 35.7 Mbits/sec [ 4] 37.00-38.00 sec 4.39 MBytes 36.9 Mbits/sec [ 4] 38.00-39.00 sec 4.79 MBytes 40.2 Mbits/sec [ 4] 39.00-40.00 sec 3.62 MBytes 30.4 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-40.00 sec 160 MBytes 33.5 Mbits/sec sender [ 4] 0.00-40.00 sec 160 MBytes 33.5 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. -
@stephenw10 My friend and I have no direct ports open / nodes to ping so I'm not sure how I could ping between the public IP's.
-
Add a specific rule to allow only that ping from the remote public IP.
-
@cabledude said in iperf3 testing 500/40 connection: 33mpbs:
Actually I did test all individual components
What about the hardware at the other end? Running a vpn tunnel is reasonalbly processor intensive.
-
@stephenw10 said in iperf3 testing 500/40 connection: 33mpbs:
Add a specific rule to allow only that ping from the remote public IP.
Something of this sort?
Pete
Home: SG-2100 + UniFi + Synology. SG-1100 retired
Parents: SG-1100 + UniFi + Synology
Testing: SG-1100 w/ 120GB SSD via ext USB (eMMC dead). Works great -
@patch said in iperf3 testing 500/40 connection: 33mpbs:
What about the hardware at the other end? Running a vpn tunnel is reasonalbly processor intensive.
this is my end (speedtest is over WiFi but FTR VPN test was wired):
My friend's firewall is a USG 3P but the VPN wasn't S2S but remote access so I think his firewall isn't doing any encryption is it?
This is his line:
-
@cabledude said in iperf3 testing 500/40 connection: 33mpbs:
Something of this sort?
I would set the protocol to ICMP and the destination to WAN address. But since that's a single source IP and one you trust the risk is minimal.
Steve
-
Just taking his 18ms I see there as lowest one..
With only a 64k window your looking at 29.13 Mbit/sec due to the BDP..
Also lets not forget the overhead, are you trying to send 1500, those will get fragmented, again also lowering the performance. What is the box on his end doing the vpn connection? His router, what router is that - if some soho type of router, while it might be able to do a 200mbps connection, what can it push through a openvpn connection?
You prob want to adjust your txqueuelen and your tcp-queue-limit as well if your trying to see what is the max you could achieve for performance.
-
@johnpoz said in iperf3 testing 500/40 connection: 33mpbs:
Just taking his 18ms I see there as lowest one..
With only a 64k window your looking at 29.13 Mbit/sec due to the BDP..
That sounds about right! Could you share your calculation, I am very interested in that.
His router is a UniFi USG 3P. Not the fastest box but he can do about 80 mbps with his VPNs.
-
There are few calculators around.. Here is one I use
https://www.switch.ch/network/tools/tcp_throughput/ -
@johnpoz Hi John, thank you, good read.
I was just thinking what protocol am I using for the pfSense OpenVPN setup and it is UDP. Is this relevant for the BDP? If i read the article correctly it assumes TCP.
Thank you for helping out! I am learning every day :)
Pete
-
@cabledude what your tunnel is doesn't really matter. Your testing with TCP from your iperf outputs.
-
@johnpoz Ah okay I see, thank you.
So apparently building a VPN tunnel for high speed backups isn't as easy as simply connecting two gigabit nodes.
In order to troubleshoot further, would it be of any use to repeat the iperf3 test using UDP? Or using any other flags?
My friend is not available for further testing today but I might get a chance next week. He is willing to ping to my network tonight (UTC +1) though.
Pete
-
@cabledude said in iperf3 testing 500/40 connection: 33mpbs:
would it be of any use to repeat the iperf3 test using UDP?
Depends on what your wanting accomplish - if just to see if a difference sure, but does your backup actually leverage udp ;)
-
Testing using UDP eliminates the TCP windowing/ack packets issue so can be useful as long as you interpret the result correctly.
You should definitely use UDP for the VPN tunnel itself. You should only ever use TCP there if you are forced to, like is UDP is blocked. A TCP connection inside a TCP tunnel can produce horrible results.
Steve
-
@stephenw10 said in iperf3 testing 500/40 connection: 33mpbs:
Not really, you'd have to ping between the public IPs directly outside the VPN.
18 packets transmitted, 18 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 15.493/18.116/24.227/2.289 msThis is a ping outside the tunnel from my friend's UniFi USG 200/200 fibre to my SG-1100 500/40 cable.
