Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Qotom H/W Upgrade Recommendation

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    19 Posts 7 Posters 2.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      Patch @4o4rh
      last edited by

      @gwaitsi

      1. What WAN speed now & foreseeable future?
      2. What lan to lan filtering / pass through speed is required?
      4 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • 4
        4o4rh @Patch
        last edited by

        @patch said in Qotom H/W Upgrade Recommendation:

        @gwaitsi

        1. What WAN speed now & foreseeable future?
        2. What lan to lan filtering / pass through speed is required?

        WAN2 Backup - 120Mg cable not likely to upgrade
        WAN1 Primary - 100Mg fibre likely to upgrade to 250Mg in the future

        LAN to LAN should have minimal performance degradation.
        Currently, only getting about 800Mg with the J1900

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          An i3 should do that easily. And I'd be surprised if you need more than 8GB unless you're running every package there is!

          Steve

          4 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • 4
            4o4rh @stephenw10
            last edited by

            @stephenw10 with 8G, ram tmp drive and without nTOP, I am at 51% on the J1900. If i turn on nTOP, the ram usage goes up until the system crashes.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              Hmm, that sounds more like a memory leak in ntop. What size RAM drives?

              The only RAM issue I've seen recently was the bug in PCSCD but that is disabled by default in 2.6/22.01.

              Steve

              4 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • 4
                4o4rh @stephenw10
                last edited by

                @stephenw10 2G and it is only 6% at present, but if I use NTOP it becomes full over a relatively short time frame. But any way, I did the i3 with 16Gb and 256Gb. see how i go with that

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  Mmm, that's a massive RAM drive. If you need something that large you probably shouldn't be using RAM drives.

                  Steve

                  4 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • 4
                    4o4rh @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10 thinking of the swap drive, ram is 512. but they both fill with ntop so i don't use now. Will give another shot once the new box arrives.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      Ah if SWAP fills that's worse. That only happens after the RAM has been exhausted. I'm not sure how you have ntop configured but that seems extreme!

                      4 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • 4
                        4o4rh @stephenw10
                        last edited by

                        @stephenw10 I didn't use it for a long time because the /var would fill from the ntop logs. When that happened, the whole system would cark it, so I had to disable. But I will give it another shot once the new system is in place.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 4
                          4o4rh
                          last edited by

                          i got the i3.
                          CPUs are running 20deg c hotter than my J1900 without any traffic.

                          I have them setup in parallel. core temps are 62deg vs 48 on the J1900.

                          there is a noticable difference in OpenVPN performance, particularly on the RTTsd values and on the primary RTT value. But otherwise, the benifits are marginal.

                          very concerned about the CPU temps, cause even now as i write it is up to 75 to 77

                          V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • V
                            viragomann @4o4rh
                            last edited by

                            @gwaitsi
                            I'd suspect, there must be something wrong. Maybe the thermal conductive foil is missing?

                            I have a Qotom with an i5 (15W) running pfSense on top of Linux KVM aside a Linux webserver. It's temperature is at about 40 °C at normal load.
                            However, the temp grows up to 60 °C quickly if it's under heavy load.

                            4 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • 4
                              4o4rh @viragomann
                              last edited by 4o4rh

                              So, i disabled everything and just left a single LAN and WAN interface with a VPN. disabled pfblocker, suricata, etc. and i am still sitting 55 to 60degC average and the CPU load is like 1 to 2%

                              Does anyone know of a LiveCD for performance testing that i can use to stress test with a temp display, so i can eliminate whether it is pfsense or not?

                              T bingo600B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • T
                                Tzvia @4o4rh
                                last edited by Tzvia

                                @gwaitsi said in Qotom H/W Upgrade Recommendation:

                                So, i disabled everything and just left a single LAN and WAN interface with a VPN. disabled pfblocker, suricata, etc. and i am still sitting 55 to 60degC average and the CPU load is like 1 to 2%

                                Does anyone know of a LiveCD for performance testing that i can use to stress test with a temp display, so i can eliminate whether it is pfsense or not?

                                That sure doesn't sound right, 55 to 60c with that low a load. If you want to boot into something else on a USB stick, there is always Windows to Go. Download the Windows 10 iso from Microsoft, grab a copy of Rufus which can make it in a snap, and a 32gig stick, and you can boot Windows from the stick. I use that to trouble shoot and recover files from PCs that don't boot.
                                I've got the I5 Qotom, and while my setup isn't as complex as yours, just lan and 6 vlans, using all 6 NICs, SNORT and PFBlocker, and a number of rules on each interface. My cpu hovers around 5% at about 38c, 25% of 8gigs ram in use, only one WAN, 400meg down cable internet. Even when working from home, with two VPN connections to work going on top of the normal usage, it only hits around 42~44c.

                                Tzvia

                                Current build:
                                Hunsn/CWWK Pentium Gold 8505, 6x i226v 'micro firewall'
                                16 gigs ram
                                500gig WD Blue nvme
                                Using modded BIOS (enabled CSTATES)
                                PFSense 2.72-RELEASE
                                Enabled Intel SpeedShift
                                Snort
                                PFBlockerNG
                                LAN and 5 VLANS

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • bingo600B
                                  bingo600 @4o4rh
                                  last edited by

                                  @gwaitsi

                                  That sounds as quite a high temp , for a nearly idling system

                                  This is my Qotom Test system - (Older 6-port i3-7130U) , idling at around 36C
                                  a424c7e8-7c1d-408c-89a5-e5e782f76330-image.png

                                  My "Home" i5 is doing 8% load at around 48C

                                  There has been reports about some Qotoms , that had bad thermal contact.
                                  And needed a disassembly , and a clean & re-apply of thermal paste.

                                  I have around 10 of them , and haven't had an issue w any of them.

                                  If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a šŸ‘ - "thumbs up"

                                  pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                                  QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                                  CPUĀ  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                                  LANĀ  : 4 x Intel 211, DiskĀ  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                                  4 fireodoF 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • 4
                                    4o4rh @bingo600
                                    last edited by

                                    @bingo600 yep, mine is on the desk only connected to the PC and WAN while i setup and burn-in so, it is quite concerning that i am 20deg above yours

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • fireodoF
                                      fireodo @bingo600
                                      last edited by fireodo

                                      @bingo600 said in Qotom H/W Upgrade Recommendation:

                                      And needed a disassembly , and a clean & re-apply of thermal paste.

                                      Thats what I have done after receiving my Qotom and now the Temperature is around 36-38°C with moderate load.

                                      Regards,
                                      fireodo

                                      Kettop Mi4300YL CPU: i5-4300Y @ 1.60GHz RAM: 8GB Ethernet Ports: 4
                                      SSD: SanDisk pSSD-S2 16GB (ZFS) WiFi: WLE200NX
                                      pfsense 2.8.0 CE
                                      Packages: Apcupsd, Cron, Iftop, Iperf, LCDproc, Nmap, pfBlockerNG, RRD_Summary, Shellcmd, Snort, Speedtest, System_Patches.

                                      4 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • 4
                                        4o4rh @fireodo
                                        last edited by

                                        @fireodo ok. i'll bite the bullet and try it. I have tried disabling all interfaces and services and bring them back and definitely, irrespective of the heat sink, pfBlockerNG makes the temprature rise by at least 5deg

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.