Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    WAN & LAN @ Gigabit but Limited to Sub 100Mbps

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    28 Posts 6 Posters 3.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JKnottJ
      JKnott @stephenw10
      last edited by

      @stephenw10

      Does anything use half duplex these days? IIRC, full duplex is mandatory for Gb and above.

      If I do an archaeological dig in my junk closet, I may be able to find a 10 Mb hub that's half duplex. It's the only piece of hardware I've owned that was.

      PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
      i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
      UniFi AC-Lite access point

      I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        Mmm, been a while since I saw any 10base2. 😉

        However 100M-Half-Duplex is a common fall-back link for devices if negotiation fails so you do, relatively, often seen that.
        IMO there no good reason to be using a fixed speed anywhere either but some ISPs still supply stuff configured for 100M fixed that cannot be changed.

        Steve

        JKnottJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • JKnottJ
          JKnott @stephenw10
          last edited by JKnott

          @stephenw10

          I started out with 10base5 and hand wiring¹ Ethernet controllers on prototype boards for Data General Eclipse computers. We also had some DEC VAX 11/780 computers on the network. As I mentioned I've had to use fixed speeds with fibre to copper media converters.

          1. I'm probably the only one here who has hand wired an Ethernet controller.

          PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
          i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
          UniFi AC-Lite access point

          I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            samyboyz @viragomann
            last edited by

            @viragomann Yes, it's costing me lots more in electricity, i just ordered a Qotom i3 for like $319 Canadian Dollers, can't wait to install it :)

            V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • V
              viragomann @samyboyz
              last edited by

              @samyboyz
              I think, this was a good decision.

              I've a Qotom i5 with 4 NICs, bought it 4 years ago. I've installed LInux on it and run pfSense on the top of KVM alongside a cloud VM and an LXC.
              Measured its power consumption over a 3 days duration, it took about 7 W average.
              So I guess, you will have a cost return after about 2 years. :-)

              JKnottJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JKnottJ
                JKnott @viragomann
                last edited by

                @viragomann

                I guess your's is similar to mine (see sig). I also tried to measure the power, using apcupsd and concluded it was only a few watts. However, I installed only pfsense on it, as I don't think firewalls should be doing anything else.

                PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
                i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
                UniFi AC-Lite access point

                I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

                V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • V
                  viragomann @JKnott
                  last edited by

                  @jknott said in WAN & LAN @ Gigabit but Limited to Sub 100Mbps:

                  I guess your's is similar to mine (see sig).

                  i5-4200U, 8 GB RAM, 120 GB SSD, 2 TB HDD. The i5 is really powerful enough for all my home use and on the other hand, the U models are very energy-efficient. However, they might have a small delay to throttle up.
                  I have the operating systems on the SSD and the HDD is for data store. So the HDD can go to sleep when no data are requested, which additionally saves power.

                  Yes, you're right. I know the risk of running a firewall virtualized alongside other VMs. But this is for home use, I'm well familiar with virtualization and the host and VM are well maintained. And I like to have the things compact and tidy. 😊

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    samyboyz
                    last edited by

                    I just installed the Qotom i3, only had a 2GB memory module so threw it in, getting same speed as the old HP, 95Mbps while getting 115/120 at the Model, connection says 1000 for WAN & LAN so still wondering what might be causing the loss

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      How are you actually testing the speed?

                      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        samyboyz @stephenw10
                        last edited by

                        @stephenw10 with Fast.com or Speedtest.net

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          Still no errors shown on WAN or LAN? Links show as autoselect 1G-full duplex?

                          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            samyboyz @stephenw10
                            last edited by samyboyz

                            @stephenw10 2022-02-19_19-02-26.jpg2022-02-19_19-04-33.jpg

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              Hmm, I assume CPU usage is minimal during this test?

                              Try running at the CLI during the test: top -aSH

                              Can you see the expected throughput between internal interfaces?

                              Steve

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.