Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Upgrade 2.5.2 to 2.6.0, upgrade success, Limiters not passing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    129 Posts 32 Posters 36.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G
      GeorgeCZ58 @SteveITS
      last edited by

      @steveits I test also your setup. Also tested with only one interface. Now i tested again and I find, that ping is working. So only DNS stopped to work here.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        Are you able to see if that's all udp traffic or just DNS?

        G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • G
          GeorgeCZ58 @stephenw10
          last edited by

          @stephenw10 I dont have idea how can I check if is UDP working, without dns - can you give me advice please :-) ? There is temp W server 2019 running, I can install on it whatever we need.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • E
            Earthlingz
            last edited by Earthlingz

            The same thing happened to me yesterday after upgrading to 2.6.0. I dont even have limiters set up. At first i thought it might be a realtek issue but i tried installing the drivers from here https://forum.netgate.com/topic/166746/realtek-re-kmod-missing-in-pfsense-2-6-repository and same thing happened still no internet. It might still be a realtek driver unless someone here with different NIC experiences the same problem. Check using Diag > Ping and the pfsense able to ping websites it just cant give internet to my network.

            So i gave up for now and reverted back to 2.5.2

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              Most clients will attempt to send ntp traffic at least. You should see that in the states. It will probably try to use the interface IP directly though which may not hit the issue.
              You can just try a udp traceroute.

              Steve

              G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • G
                GeorgeCZ58 @stephenw10
                last edited by

                @stephenw10 no it seem, that it was working only because I have separated FW rules for ICMP and UDP. When I now make one rule for all and set here limiters, nothing was working.
                7892ba85-144d-409f-a873-fe164180aff3-obrazek.png

                One maybe strange think is, that I see in states traffic from devices that are few hours disconnected from network, this is ok? States arent reseting itself?

                T stephenw10S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T
                  thiasaef @GeorgeCZ58
                  last edited by

                  I bet my ass that the issue is related to the DNS Resolver being fucked up once again.

                  stephenw10S E T 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @GeorgeCZ58
                    last edited by

                    @georgecz58 said in upgrade 2.5.2 to 2.6.0, upgrade success, no internet conection:

                    When I now make one rule for all and set here limiters, nothing was working

                    There is two way traffic shown there but clients in the WIFI_231 subnet are unable to connect at all with that ruleset?

                    With the separate rules enabled do you see states/traffic shown for all three protocols?

                    Steve

                    G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @thiasaef
                      last edited by

                      @thiasaef

                      I don't think it is that but you can easily test that theory by switching to DNSMasq.

                      T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • E
                        Earthlingz @thiasaef
                        last edited by

                        @thiasaef said in upgrade 2.5.2 to 2.6.0, upgrade success, no internet conection:

                        I bet my ass that the issue is related to the DNS Resolver being fucked up once again.

                        i use DNS Forwarder so i cant blame DNS Resolver since i get the same problem.

                        F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                        • T
                          thiasaef @stephenw10
                          last edited by

                          @stephenw10 I would probably do that for testing purposes, if I still had 2.6 installed.

                          The only thing I can tell you is that it repeatedly stopped working on some LAN networks while still working on others, and I could always fix the problem by restarting DNS Resolver once or twice and doing nothing else. After a day of problems, with no solution in sight, I had no choice but to downgrade.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • G
                            GeorgeCZ58 @stephenw10
                            last edited by

                            @stephenw10 Yes, with separated rules , traffic stopped to be working on rule where was limiter. I also find another issues, so I switched to second device for now as there was lot of issues :-/

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              Ok, it looks like you had/have a captive portal active there which I think it probably the source if the issues you are seeing.

                              In fact in fact I think a lot of the issues that look like Limiters may be and that's why replicating it has proved difficult.

                              Anyone here seeing connectivity issues on interfaces with Limiters without Captive Portal running?

                              Steve

                              E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • E
                                Earthlingz @stephenw10
                                last edited by

                                @stephenw10 I should have tested turning off captive portal first before downgrading. captive portal might be the culprit here.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • B
                                  Bohodir @aju_flex
                                  last edited by

                                  @aju_flex Same thing on me too. I have 8 VLANs, and after upgrading to 2.6.0 limiters started to block internet. As soon take off limiters on IN/OUT pipeline it is working fine. It is annoying bug, downgrading to 2.5.2.

                                  L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • T
                                    tohil
                                    last edited by

                                    Hi

                                    I have no captive portal on this interface, not using dns forwarder or resolver.
                                    Clients get OpenDNS server from dhcp server config.

                                    If I enable limitiers on the second rule, I cannot access http://1.1.1.1 from a browser.

                                    alt text

                                    GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • GertjanG
                                      Gertjan @tohil
                                      last edited by

                                      @tohil said in upgrade 2.5.2 to 2.6.0, upgrade success, no internet conection:

                                      If I enable limitiers on the second rule, I cannot access http://1.1.1.1 from a browser.

                                      Small, not related detail :

                                      Even when I'm not using pfSense, http://1.1.1.1 doesn't producing anything.
                                      1.1.1.1 is a DNS resolver, listing over port 53 UDP and TCP. Why do you think it listening on port 80 TCP ?

                                      No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                                      Edit : and where are the logs ??

                                      T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • T
                                        tohil @Gertjan
                                        last edited by tohil

                                        @gertjan

                                        i mean https 443. check https://1.1.1.1/

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • L
                                          Luca De Andreis @Bohodir
                                          last edited by

                                          I don't know if my problem is related to this post .. I have more than 20 PfSense installed, in general the upgrade from release 2.5.2 to 2.6.0 went well, but, on two firewalls that use limiters, updated yesterday , it happened that the natted ports (tcp and udp) were no longer reachable (regulated by the limiters), a downgrade to the 2.5.2 release completely solved the problem.

                                          T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • T
                                            tohil @Luca De Andreis
                                            last edited by

                                            @luca-de-andreis
                                            inbound NAT? Destination NAT?

                                            maybe source NAT is the issue with internet access for the other issues here....

                                            L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.