Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    IPv6 WAN Gateway monitoring reports 100% packet loss

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPv6
    36 Posts 6 Posters 6.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ?
      A Former User @A Former User
      last edited by

      @vortex21

      Hi, upgraded to release 22.05.r.20220614.0600 today and IPv6 WAN monitoring again failed requiring WAN interface having to be saved and then Apply Changes for it to start working again.

      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        A Former User @A Former User
        last edited by

        @vortex21

        Upgraded to 22.05.r.20220614.1944 and experienced the same problem. Also worth noting that unless Prefer to use IPv4 even if IPv6 is available (System -> Advanced -> Networking ) is enabled then upgrade will not complete.

        ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          A Former User @A Former User
          last edited by

          @vortex21

          Just upgraded to 22.05.r.20220617.0613 but only after ensuring that Prefer IPv4 even if IPv6 is available is enabled in System -> Advanced -> Networking.
          After applying update, I still lose connectivity to the IPv6 gateway. So that I have to save the WAN settings again to get the IPv6 gateway monitoring to work, this is with out changing any settings. From a monitoring perspective the RTT and RTTsd times are lower for IPv6 compared to IPv4.

          luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • luckman212L
            luckman212 LAYER 8 @A Former User
            last edited by

            @vortex21 I think you might be seeing the same issue as I was here. You could try the linked PR #4595 to see if it helps your issue.

            ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              A Former User @luckman212
              last edited by

              @luckman212

              Hi, tried applying the fix in the latest update of https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/pull/4595. Unfortunately it did not fix the problem, I had to re-save the WAN interface settings and IPv6 GW Montoring worked

              luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • luckman212L
                luckman212 LAYER 8 @A Former User
                last edited by

                @vortex21 How did you apply the fix? As it states in the PR notes, it probably won't work with the System Patches package alone due to the number of changes and the differences between the original files in pfS+ vs CE. So did you manually apply the changes to all the related files?

                ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User @luckman212
                  last edited by

                  @luckman212
                  Hi, followed the steps below

                  1 install cmdwatch:

                   pkg add https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:12:amd64/latest/All/cmdwatch-0.2.0_2.txz
                  
                  1. download the script:

                    fetch https://gist.githubusercontent.com/luckman212/0fdea1cbdc0a561d781a52c7d34fb60d/raw/ffd321ef196fb1c919dd66700acdd4acc02b3e63/dpinger_static_routes.php

                  2. cmdwatch --interval=2 'php -q dpinger_static_routes.php'

                  3. php -a
                    include("config.inc");
                    install_cron_job('/usr/bin/nice -n20 /etc/rc.checkv6addrchange', true, "/1", '', '', '', '*', 'root', true);

                  4. After reboot, ran via ssh cmdwatch --interval=2 'php -q dpinger_static_routes.php'

                  5. Then checked GUI, IPv6 monitoring was offline, and I had to save WAN interface to fix monitoring issue.

                  luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • luckman212L
                    luckman212 LAYER 8 @A Former User
                    last edited by

                    @vortex21 You are missing most of the important steps. You just downloaded the little helper script from the other PR which does nothing but display some info. You need to apply the patches in the linked commit that actually change the behavior. I know it might be a bit complicated- so I'll try to post a step by step.

                    Are you using pfSense+ or CE?

                    ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ?
                      A Former User @luckman212
                      last edited by

                      @luckman212

                      Hi,

                      Currently running pfsense+ 22.05.r.20220617.0613

                      luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • luckman212L
                        luckman212 LAYER 8 @A Former User
                        last edited by

                        @vortex21 I posted some new instructions on the PR#4595. I hope you're able to give them a try.

                        ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ?
                          A Former User @luckman212
                          last edited by

                          @luckman212

                          Hi, I followed the instructions, applying the system patches and then the new patch. After rebooting, and login the IPv6 GW Monitoring was reporting 70% packet loss and as I watched it increased to 77% before I re-saved the WAN interface which fixed the problem.

                          luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • luckman212L
                            luckman212 LAYER 8 @A Former User
                            last edited by

                            @vortex21 If your IPv6 WAN is down immediately after a fresh boot then something different is going on here. Can you send some more details?

                            • how is your WAN6 configured- DHCP6, SLAAC, etc?
                            • can you ssh in after rebooting your system and run ifconfig -v -- copy the output.
                            • then, edit your interface and hit Save, and run ifconfig -v again and copy that too. Paste those outputs here (or if you don't want to post publicly, PM it to me)
                            • what happens if you manually run /etc/rc.checkv6addrchange ? Does it give you an error? Does anything change after running that?
                            ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ?
                              A Former User @luckman212
                              last edited by

                              @luckman212

                              Hi,

                              I captured the output of ifconfig -v pasting it into a txt file after-reboot.txt , saved the WAN interface and repeated ifconfig -v saving it into after-save.txt. Then I used diff to compare the after-reboot.txt and after-save.txt and found no change in the configuration.

                              ifconfig -v

                              igb0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1492
                              description: LAN
                              options=e527bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
                              ether :::::a6
                              inet6 fe80::bbbb:bbbb:bbbb:bbbb%igb0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
                              inet6 2a02:SSSS:SSSS::SSSS prefixlen 64
                              inet XXX:XXX:XXX.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast XXX:XXX:XXX.255
                              media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
                              status: active
                              nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
                              igb1: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
                              options=e507bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
                              ether ::
                              :::a7
                              media: Ethernet autoselect
                              status: no carrier
                              nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
                              em0: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
                              options=81249b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,LRO,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWFILTER>
                              ether ££:££:££:££:££:6e
                              media: Ethernet autoselect
                              status: no carrier
                              nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
                              igb2: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
                              options=e527bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
                              ether &&:&&:&&:&&:e4
                              inet6 fe80::dddd:dddd:dddd:dddd%igb2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
                              media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
                              status: active
                              nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
                              igb3: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
                              options=e507bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
                              ether &&:&&:&&:&&:e5
                              media: Ethernet autoselect
                              status: no carrier
                              nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
                              enc0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1536
                              groups: enc
                              nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
                              lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384
                              options=680003<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,LINKSTATE,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
                              inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
                              inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7
                              inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
                              groups: lo
                              nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
                              pfsync0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1500
                              groups: pfsync
                              pflog0: flags=100<PROMISC> metric 0 mtu 33160
                              groups: pflog
                              igb2.3: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1492
                              description: WAN
                              options=600703<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
                              ether &&:&&:&&:&&:e4
                              inet6 fe80::dddd:dddd:dddd:dddd%igb2.3 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xa
                              inet6 2a02:LLLL:LLLL::LLLL prefixlen 64
                              inet YYY:YYY:YYY10 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast YYY:YYY:YYY255
                              groups: vlan
                              vlan: 3 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: igb2
                              media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
                              status: active
                              nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
                              igb0.2: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1492
                              description: LANWORK
                              options=600703<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
                              ether ::::**:a6
                              inet6 fe80::bbbb:bbbb:bbbb:bbbb%igb0.2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xb
                              inet KKK:KKK:KKK.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast KKK:KKK:KKK.255
                              groups: vlan
                              vlan: 2 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: igb0
                              media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
                              status: active
                              nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>

                              luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • luckman212L
                                luckman212 LAYER 8 @A Former User
                                last edited by

                                @vortex21 Ok so you have VLANs on both LAN (igb0) and WAN (igb2) interfaces?

                                Please answer these other questions:

                                • how is your IPv6 configured on WAN & LAN interfaces (DHCP6, SLAAC etc)
                                • are you using PPPoE?
                                • what is the result of manually running /etc/rc.checkv6addrchange
                                • please also paste the output of pgrep -lf dpinger
                                ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ?
                                  A Former User @luckman212
                                  last edited by A Former User

                                  @luckman212 said in IPv6 WAN Gateway monitoring reports 100% packet loss:

                                  -lf dpinger

                                  lease answer these other questions:

                                  how is your IPv6 configured on WAN & LAN interfaces (DHCP6, SLAAC etc)
                                         WAN and LAN are both statically assigned IPv6 address
                                         DHCPv6 is running within my internal network but is being handled by raspberry pi running ISC Kea
                                  
                                  are you using PPPoE?
                                         No, PPPoE is not configured on firewall
                                  
                                  what is the result of manually running /etc/rc.checkv6addrchange
                                            no output, no change in IPv6 gateway monitoring in GUI     
                                  
                                  please also paste the output of pgrep -lf dpinger
                                  
                                  8312 /usr/local/bin/dpinger -S -r 0 -i 
                                               WANGWv6 -B 2a02:yyyy:yyyy:y:yyyy:yyyy:yyyy:yyyy -p /var/run/dpinger_
                                               WANGWv6~fa5faaa6~2a02:xxxx:xxxxx:x:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.pid -u /var/run/dpinger_
                                               WANGWv6~fa5faaa6~2a02:xxxx:xxxxx:x:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.sock -C /etc/rc.gateway_alarm -d 1 -s 500 -l 2000 -t 60000 -A 1000 -D 500 -L 20 2a02:8xxxx:xxxxx:x:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx
                                     7987 /usr/local/bin/dpinger -S -r 0 -i 
                                               WANGWv4 -B yyy.yyy.yyy.10 -p /var/run/dpinger_WANGWv4~yyy.yyy.yyy.10~nnn.nnn.nnn.1.pid -u /var/run/dpinger_
                                               WANGWv4~yyy.yyy.yyy.10~nnn.nnn.nnn.1.sock -C /etc/rc.gateway_alarm -d 1 -s 500 -l 2000 -t 60000 -A 1000 -D 500 -L 20 nnn.nnn.n.1
                                  
                                  luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • luckman212L
                                    luckman212 LAYER 8 @A Former User
                                    last edited by

                                    @vortex21 Ok so you have static IPv6's configured -- well then this appears to be a different problem, not really the one that my PR is designed to solve!

                                    The pgrep -lf dpinger output you pasted above, is that from before or after you re-saved your interface config? Hard to tell, but looking at it, I would guess after (because it appears to be bound [-B 2a02:] to the correct IP). Can you post the "before" output as well?

                                    ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • ?
                                      A Former User @luckman212
                                      last edited by

                                      @luckman212

                                      Immediately after reboot
                                      pgrep -lf dpinger

                                      43507 /usr/local/bin/dpinger -S -r 0 -i
                                      WANGWv6 -B 2a02::22 -p /var/run/dpinger_
                                      WANGWv6~fa5faaa6~2a02::38.pid -u /var/run/dpinger_
                                      WANGWv6~fa5faaa6~2a02::38.sock -C /etc/rc.gateway_alarm -d 1 -s 500 -l 2000 -t 60000 -A 1000 -D 500 -L 20 2a02::38

                                      42959 /usr/local/bin/dpinger -S -r 0 -i
                                      WANGWv4 -B -p /var/run/dpinger_
                                      WANGWv4~yyy.yyy.yyy.10~nnn.nnn.nnn.1.pid -u /var/run/dpinger_
                                      WANGWv4~yyy.yyy.yyy.10~nnn.nnn.nnn.1.sock -C /etc/rc.gateway_alarm -d 1 -s 500 -l 2000 -t 60000 -A 1000 -D 500 -L 20 nnn.nnn.nnn.1
                                      [22.05-RC][admin@pfsense]/root:

                                      Reporting GUI login
                                      Message from syslogd@gw at Jun 21 16:46:30 ...
                                      php-fpm[384]: /index.php: Successful login for user 'admin' from: 2a02::1 (Local Database)

                                      Immediately after WAN interface save
                                      [22.05-RC][admin@pfsense]/root: pgrep -lf dpinger
                                      63333 /usr/local/bin/dpinger -S -r 0 -i
                                      WANGWv6 -B 2a02::22 -p /var/run/dpinger_
                                      WANGWv6~fa5faaa6~2a02::38.pid -u /var/run/dpinger_
                                      WANGWv6~fa5faaa6~2a02::38.sock -C /etc/rc.gateway_alarm -d 1 -s 500 -l 2000 -t 60000 -A 1000 -D 500 -L 20 2a02:38
                                      63257 /usr/local/bin/dpinger -S -r 0 -i WANGWv4 -B yyy.yyy.yyy.10 -p /var/run/dpinger_WANGWv4~yyy.yyy.yyy.10~nnn.nnn.nnn.1.pid -u /var/run/dpinger_WANGWv4~yyy.yyy.yyy.10~nnn.nnn.nnn.1.sock -C /etc/rc.gateway_alarm -d 1 -s 500 -l 2000 -t 60000 -A 1000 -D 500 -L 20 nnn.nnn.nnn.1
                                      [22.05-RC][admin@pfsense]/root:

                                      luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • luckman212L
                                        luckman212 LAYER 8 @A Former User
                                        last edited by

                                        @vortex21 Makes no sense- the dpinger process and args from "before" are identical to the "after". So there must be a difference in the interface config.

                                        Can you post before & after of ifconfig -v and ndp -a?

                                        It would help if you didn't redact the info, if you're worried about privacy use a password protected pastebin, PM, etc...

                                        ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • ?
                                          A Former User @luckman212
                                          last edited by A Former User

                                          @luckman212
                                          Hi,

                                          Took the output of ifconfig -v from before and after and use diff to find the differences

                                          • diff after.txt before.txt
                                            2c2
                                            < igb0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1492

                                          igb0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1492
                                          23c23
                                          < igb2: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500


                                          igb2: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
                                          50c50
                                          < igb2.3: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1492


                                          igb2.3: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1492
                                          62c62
                                          < igb0.2: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1492


                                          igb0.2: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1492
                                          78,79c78

                                          When looking at ndp -a and comparing before and after saving the WAN interface, the difference is four link local interfaces

                                          fe80::21c:ffff:fef0:b5e%igb0 00:0c:29:f0:0b:5e igb0 2s R
                                          fe80::21c:ffff:febe:772b%igb0 00:0c:29:be:77:2b igb0 13s R
                                          fe80::21d:bbff:fec9:5938%igb2.3 00:1d:aa:f9:59:38 igb2.3 24s R R
                                          fe80::21c:ffff:fe38:293e%igb0 00:0c:29:88:39:3e igb0 23h59m39s S

                                          luckman212L johnpozJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • luckman212L
                                            luckman212 LAYER 8 @A Former User
                                            last edited by

                                            @vortex21 The forum is mangling your output. Can you please put it on a private pastebin instead of just posting the diff output which is not easy to decipher.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.