Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    IPv6 WAN Gateway monitoring reports 100% packet loss

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPv6
    36 Posts 6 Posters 6.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • luckman212L
      luckman212 LAYER 8 @A Former User
      last edited by

      @vortex21 I posted some new instructions on the PR#4595. I hope you're able to give them a try.

      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        A Former User @luckman212
        last edited by

        @luckman212

        Hi, I followed the instructions, applying the system patches and then the new patch. After rebooting, and login the IPv6 GW Monitoring was reporting 70% packet loss and as I watched it increased to 77% before I re-saved the WAN interface which fixed the problem.

        luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • luckman212L
          luckman212 LAYER 8 @A Former User
          last edited by

          @vortex21 If your IPv6 WAN is down immediately after a fresh boot then something different is going on here. Can you send some more details?

          • how is your WAN6 configured- DHCP6, SLAAC, etc?
          • can you ssh in after rebooting your system and run ifconfig -v -- copy the output.
          • then, edit your interface and hit Save, and run ifconfig -v again and copy that too. Paste those outputs here (or if you don't want to post publicly, PM it to me)
          • what happens if you manually run /etc/rc.checkv6addrchange ? Does it give you an error? Does anything change after running that?
          ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ?
            A Former User @luckman212
            last edited by

            @luckman212

            Hi,

            I captured the output of ifconfig -v pasting it into a txt file after-reboot.txt , saved the WAN interface and repeated ifconfig -v saving it into after-save.txt. Then I used diff to compare the after-reboot.txt and after-save.txt and found no change in the configuration.

            ifconfig -v

            igb0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1492
            description: LAN
            options=e527bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
            ether :::::a6
            inet6 fe80::bbbb:bbbb:bbbb:bbbb%igb0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
            inet6 2a02:SSSS:SSSS::SSSS prefixlen 64
            inet XXX:XXX:XXX.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast XXX:XXX:XXX.255
            media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
            status: active
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            igb1: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            options=e507bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
            ether ::
            :::a7
            media: Ethernet autoselect
            status: no carrier
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            em0: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            options=81249b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,LRO,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWFILTER>
            ether ££:££:££:££:££:6e
            media: Ethernet autoselect
            status: no carrier
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            igb2: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            options=e527bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
            ether &&:&&:&&:&&:e4
            inet6 fe80::dddd:dddd:dddd:dddd%igb2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
            media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
            status: active
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            igb3: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            options=e507bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
            ether &&:&&:&&:&&:e5
            media: Ethernet autoselect
            status: no carrier
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            enc0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1536
            groups: enc
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384
            options=680003<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,LINKSTATE,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
            inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
            inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7
            inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
            groups: lo
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            pfsync0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1500
            groups: pfsync
            pflog0: flags=100<PROMISC> metric 0 mtu 33160
            groups: pflog
            igb2.3: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1492
            description: WAN
            options=600703<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
            ether &&:&&:&&:&&:e4
            inet6 fe80::dddd:dddd:dddd:dddd%igb2.3 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xa
            inet6 2a02:LLLL:LLLL::LLLL prefixlen 64
            inet YYY:YYY:YYY10 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast YYY:YYY:YYY255
            groups: vlan
            vlan: 3 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: igb2
            media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
            status: active
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            igb0.2: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1492
            description: LANWORK
            options=600703<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
            ether ::::**:a6
            inet6 fe80::bbbb:bbbb:bbbb:bbbb%igb0.2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xb
            inet KKK:KKK:KKK.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast KKK:KKK:KKK.255
            groups: vlan
            vlan: 2 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: igb0
            media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
            status: active
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>

            luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • luckman212L
              luckman212 LAYER 8 @A Former User
              last edited by

              @vortex21 Ok so you have VLANs on both LAN (igb0) and WAN (igb2) interfaces?

              Please answer these other questions:

              • how is your IPv6 configured on WAN & LAN interfaces (DHCP6, SLAAC etc)
              • are you using PPPoE?
              • what is the result of manually running /etc/rc.checkv6addrchange
              • please also paste the output of pgrep -lf dpinger
              ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ?
                A Former User @luckman212
                last edited by A Former User

                @luckman212 said in IPv6 WAN Gateway monitoring reports 100% packet loss:

                -lf dpinger

                lease answer these other questions:

                how is your IPv6 configured on WAN & LAN interfaces (DHCP6, SLAAC etc)
                       WAN and LAN are both statically assigned IPv6 address
                       DHCPv6 is running within my internal network but is being handled by raspberry pi running ISC Kea
                
                are you using PPPoE?
                       No, PPPoE is not configured on firewall
                
                what is the result of manually running /etc/rc.checkv6addrchange
                          no output, no change in IPv6 gateway monitoring in GUI     
                
                please also paste the output of pgrep -lf dpinger
                
                8312 /usr/local/bin/dpinger -S -r 0 -i 
                             WANGWv6 -B 2a02:yyyy:yyyy:y:yyyy:yyyy:yyyy:yyyy -p /var/run/dpinger_
                             WANGWv6~fa5faaa6~2a02:xxxx:xxxxx:x:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.pid -u /var/run/dpinger_
                             WANGWv6~fa5faaa6~2a02:xxxx:xxxxx:x:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx.sock -C /etc/rc.gateway_alarm -d 1 -s 500 -l 2000 -t 60000 -A 1000 -D 500 -L 20 2a02:8xxxx:xxxxx:x:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx
                   7987 /usr/local/bin/dpinger -S -r 0 -i 
                             WANGWv4 -B yyy.yyy.yyy.10 -p /var/run/dpinger_WANGWv4~yyy.yyy.yyy.10~nnn.nnn.nnn.1.pid -u /var/run/dpinger_
                             WANGWv4~yyy.yyy.yyy.10~nnn.nnn.nnn.1.sock -C /etc/rc.gateway_alarm -d 1 -s 500 -l 2000 -t 60000 -A 1000 -D 500 -L 20 nnn.nnn.n.1
                
                luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • luckman212L
                  luckman212 LAYER 8 @A Former User
                  last edited by

                  @vortex21 Ok so you have static IPv6's configured -- well then this appears to be a different problem, not really the one that my PR is designed to solve!

                  The pgrep -lf dpinger output you pasted above, is that from before or after you re-saved your interface config? Hard to tell, but looking at it, I would guess after (because it appears to be bound [-B 2a02:] to the correct IP). Can you post the "before" output as well?

                  ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ?
                    A Former User @luckman212
                    last edited by

                    @luckman212

                    Immediately after reboot
                    pgrep -lf dpinger

                    43507 /usr/local/bin/dpinger -S -r 0 -i
                    WANGWv6 -B 2a02::22 -p /var/run/dpinger_
                    WANGWv6~fa5faaa6~2a02::38.pid -u /var/run/dpinger_
                    WANGWv6~fa5faaa6~2a02::38.sock -C /etc/rc.gateway_alarm -d 1 -s 500 -l 2000 -t 60000 -A 1000 -D 500 -L 20 2a02::38

                    42959 /usr/local/bin/dpinger -S -r 0 -i
                    WANGWv4 -B -p /var/run/dpinger_
                    WANGWv4~yyy.yyy.yyy.10~nnn.nnn.nnn.1.pid -u /var/run/dpinger_
                    WANGWv4~yyy.yyy.yyy.10~nnn.nnn.nnn.1.sock -C /etc/rc.gateway_alarm -d 1 -s 500 -l 2000 -t 60000 -A 1000 -D 500 -L 20 nnn.nnn.nnn.1
                    [22.05-RC][admin@pfsense]/root:

                    Reporting GUI login
                    Message from syslogd@gw at Jun 21 16:46:30 ...
                    php-fpm[384]: /index.php: Successful login for user 'admin' from: 2a02::1 (Local Database)

                    Immediately after WAN interface save
                    [22.05-RC][admin@pfsense]/root: pgrep -lf dpinger
                    63333 /usr/local/bin/dpinger -S -r 0 -i
                    WANGWv6 -B 2a02::22 -p /var/run/dpinger_
                    WANGWv6~fa5faaa6~2a02::38.pid -u /var/run/dpinger_
                    WANGWv6~fa5faaa6~2a02::38.sock -C /etc/rc.gateway_alarm -d 1 -s 500 -l 2000 -t 60000 -A 1000 -D 500 -L 20 2a02:38
                    63257 /usr/local/bin/dpinger -S -r 0 -i WANGWv4 -B yyy.yyy.yyy.10 -p /var/run/dpinger_WANGWv4~yyy.yyy.yyy.10~nnn.nnn.nnn.1.pid -u /var/run/dpinger_WANGWv4~yyy.yyy.yyy.10~nnn.nnn.nnn.1.sock -C /etc/rc.gateway_alarm -d 1 -s 500 -l 2000 -t 60000 -A 1000 -D 500 -L 20 nnn.nnn.nnn.1
                    [22.05-RC][admin@pfsense]/root:

                    luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • luckman212L
                      luckman212 LAYER 8 @A Former User
                      last edited by

                      @vortex21 Makes no sense- the dpinger process and args from "before" are identical to the "after". So there must be a difference in the interface config.

                      Can you post before & after of ifconfig -v and ndp -a?

                      It would help if you didn't redact the info, if you're worried about privacy use a password protected pastebin, PM, etc...

                      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ?
                        A Former User @luckman212
                        last edited by A Former User

                        @luckman212
                        Hi,

                        Took the output of ifconfig -v from before and after and use diff to find the differences

                        • diff after.txt before.txt
                          2c2
                          < igb0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1492

                        igb0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1492
                        23c23
                        < igb2: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500


                        igb2: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
                        50c50
                        < igb2.3: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1492


                        igb2.3: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1492
                        62c62
                        < igb0.2: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1492


                        igb0.2: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1492
                        78,79c78

                        When looking at ndp -a and comparing before and after saving the WAN interface, the difference is four link local interfaces

                        fe80::21c:ffff:fef0:b5e%igb0 00:0c:29:f0:0b:5e igb0 2s R
                        fe80::21c:ffff:febe:772b%igb0 00:0c:29:be:77:2b igb0 13s R
                        fe80::21d:bbff:fec9:5938%igb2.3 00:1d:aa:f9:59:38 igb2.3 24s R R
                        fe80::21c:ffff:fe38:293e%igb0 00:0c:29:88:39:3e igb0 23h59m39s S

                        luckman212L johnpozJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • luckman212L
                          luckman212 LAYER 8 @A Former User
                          last edited by

                          @vortex21 The forum is mangling your output. Can you please put it on a private pastebin instead of just posting the diff output which is not easy to decipher.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • johnpozJ
                            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @A Former User
                            last edited by

                            @vortex21 another option would be to use the code block - that should help with formatting

                            codeblock.jpg

                            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                            ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ?
                              A Former User @johnpoz
                              last edited by

                              @johnpoz

                              Status After reboot

                              5ff2f7da-91dc-4563-852a-d2bafe8f1f90-image.png

                              Status After Reboot and WAN save

                              3b69ae2e-8eff-43e7-a40a-56ee60fefd19-image.png

                              ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • ?
                                A Former User @A Former User
                                last edited by

                                @vortex21
                                Hi, Upgraded to 22.05 release today and after reboot the IPv6 WAN gateway monitoring reported 100% packet loss, saving the WAN interface again and applying changes fixed it as before

                                ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ?
                                  A Former User @A Former User
                                  last edited by

                                  @vortex21

                                  Hi, I reconfigured my network yesterday to eliminate the pfSense WAN connection being on a VLAN on the external network port. The WAN interface is now the physical interface card my problem of IPv6 WAN Gateway monitoring reporting 100% loss no longer occurs.
                                  So it appears the problem was related to the use of a VLAN.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.