• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Static route over OpenVPN VPN

Routing and Multi WAN
3
24
3.7k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J
    Jarhead @Aziz 1
    last edited by Jarhead Aug 10, 2022, 9:56 PM Aug 10, 2022, 9:54 PM

    @aziz-1
    Make your server tunnel settings like this:

    login-to-view

    Make your client tunnel settings:

    login-to-view

    You don't need to add gateways or routes.
    That's all you need to do.

    If this is only going to be the two sites, you should make it a site to site as described above.

    A 1 Reply Last reply Aug 11, 2022, 4:42 AM Reply Quote 0
    • A
      Aziz 1 @Jarhead
      last edited by Aug 11, 2022, 4:42 AM

      @Jarhead Server side I have a PFSense v2.5.2Release(amd64)
      Client side I have an Embedded OpenVPN.
      I applied both config you mentioned at Server and Client side.

      Client side it's working : can ping LAN1 from LAN2.

      Server side, I start suspecting something wrong with this version. I can't ping LAN2 from LAN1. Trace route shows the below (pinging from 192.168.2.103 from 192.168.1.80) :
      1 <1ms <1ms <1ms 192.168.1.1
      2 * * * Request timed out
      3 * * * Request timed out

      While it should be :
      1 <1ms <1ms <1ms 192.168.1.1
      2 Xms Xms Xms 192.168.20.1
      3 Yms Yms Yms 192.168.10.80

      Like if the server is not taking in consideration the tunnel to the client subnet LAN2 when routing traffic !

      J 1 Reply Last reply Aug 11, 2022, 10:37 AM Reply Quote 0
      • J
        Jarhead @Aziz 1
        last edited by Aug 11, 2022, 10:37 AM

        @aziz-1 Check your routes in Diagnostic/Routes

        A 1 Reply Last reply Aug 11, 2022, 11:42 AM Reply Quote 0
        • V
          viragomann @Aziz 1
          last edited by Aug 11, 2022, 11:36 AM

          @aziz-1
          You have to set the tunnel network mask to /30 for a site to site VPN with one server and only one client.

          If you have a larger tunnel you would need to configure a CSO for the client to route the network behind the client properly.

          As well as already mentioned, set the routes in the OpenVPN settings on both sites instead of static ones.

          A 1 Reply Last reply Aug 11, 2022, 11:46 AM Reply Quote 0
          • A
            Aziz 1 @Jarhead
            last edited by Aug 11, 2022, 11:42 AM

            @jarhead login-to-view

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A
              Aziz 1 @viragomann
              last edited by Aug 11, 2022, 11:46 AM

              @viragomann Thanks Viragomann
              No static routes configured so far
              The problem is no traffic from LAN1 (server side) to LAN2 (client side) => no ping unless routes are there

              J V 2 Replies Last reply Aug 11, 2022, 12:13 PM Reply Quote 0
              • J
                Jarhead @Aziz 1
                last edited by Aug 11, 2022, 12:13 PM

                @aziz-1 You don't have a route to the 2.0 network.
                post an image of the server openvpn config.

                A 1 Reply Last reply Aug 11, 2022, 1:43 PM Reply Quote 0
                • V
                  viragomann @Aziz 1
                  last edited by Aug 11, 2022, 12:26 PM

                  @aziz-1 said in Static route over OpenVPN VPN:

                  The problem is no traffic from LAN1 (server side) to LAN2 (client side) => no ping unless routes are there

                  I know, but you should start with properly setting up your VPN connection.

                  If you can access site A from site B, but not the other way round, it's not a routing issue at all.
                  It would be rather an issue on site A due either not allowing the access by the router or the LAN devices are blocking access from outside of their subnet.

                  A 1 Reply Last reply Aug 11, 2022, 1:55 PM Reply Quote 0
                  • A
                    Aziz 1 @Jarhead
                    last edited by Aug 11, 2022, 1:43 PM

                    @jarhead ahhh sorry, I lately restored a config with 192.168.10.0 instead of 192.168.2.0 (those are the same LAN)
                    The route to 192.168.10.0 is there in the table

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A
                      Aziz 1
                      last edited by Aug 11, 2022, 1:48 PM

                      login-to-view
                      login-to-view
                      login-to-view
                      login-to-view
                      login-to-view

                      J 1 Reply Last reply Aug 11, 2022, 1:51 PM Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        Jarhead @Aziz 1
                        last edited by Aug 11, 2022, 1:51 PM

                        @aziz-1 So you changed it to a site to site?
                        Change the tunnel address to a /30 ( or even better a /31 ) on both sides.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • A
                          Aziz 1 @viragomann
                          last edited by Aug 11, 2022, 1:55 PM

                          @viragomann in both test machines : 1.80 and 10.103 (or 2.103 before) I use Wireshark to detect incoming traffic so that the local windows firewall can't be an issue

                          V 1 Reply Last reply Aug 11, 2022, 2:04 PM Reply Quote 0
                          • V
                            viragomann @Aziz 1
                            last edited by Aug 11, 2022, 2:04 PM

                            @aziz-1 said in Static route over OpenVPN VPN:
                            in both test machines : 1.80 and 10.103 (or 2.103 before) I use Wireshark to detect incoming traffic so that the local windows firewall can't be an issue

                            Network sniffing with Wireshark or whatever taps the packets in front of the firewall. So seeing the incoming packets says nothing.
                            Did you also see responses?

                            A 1 Reply Last reply Aug 11, 2022, 2:15 PM Reply Quote 0
                            • A
                              Aziz 1 @viragomann
                              last edited by Aug 11, 2022, 2:15 PM

                              @viragomann I test the ping and the tracert while running wireshark in every test machine so to be sure of having traffic between them
                              Actually I m in 10.103 remote logged to 1.80
                              In the other direction : while in 1.80 I can't access 10.1 router GUI nor ping or remote log to 10.103

                              V 1 Reply Last reply Aug 11, 2022, 2:37 PM Reply Quote 0
                              • V
                                viragomann @Aziz 1
                                last edited by Aug 11, 2022, 2:37 PM

                                @aziz-1

                                Yes, I got this already from your first post.

                                However, any connections have packets flow in both directions. There are request packets and responses. And I was asking if you see both on both sites.

                                Here you can see both:

                                16:25:16.281216 IP 10.10.81.11 > 10.10.76.53: ICMP echo request, id 1, seq 5, length 40
                                16:25:16.281454 IP 10.10.76.53 > 10.10.81.11: ICMP echo reply, id 1, seq 5, length 40
                                16:25:17.288271 IP 10.10.81.11 > 10.10.76.53: ICMP echo request, id 1, seq 6, length 40
                                16:25:17.288458 IP 10.10.76.53 > 10.10.81.11: ICMP echo reply, id 1, seq 6, length 40
                                16:25:18.303884 IP 10.10.81.11 > 10.10.76.53: ICMP echo request, id 1, seq 7, length 40
                                16:25:18.304076 IP 10.10.76.53 > 10.10.81.11: ICMP echo reply, id 1, seq 7, length 40
                                
                                

                                Here we see requests only:

                                16:30:56.995347 IP 10.10.81.11 > 10.10.76.240: ICMP echo request, id 1, seq 17, length 40
                                16:30:58.000729 IP 10.10.81.11 > 10.10.76.240: ICMP echo request, id 1, seq 18, length 40
                                16:30:59.004189 IP 10.10.81.11 > 10.10.76.240: ICMP echo request, id 1, seq 19, length 40
                                

                                In this case the capture was taken on the router and the destination device send its responses to another gateway.

                                A 1 Reply Last reply Aug 11, 2022, 2:42 PM Reply Quote 0
                                • A
                                  Aziz 1 @viragomann
                                  last edited by Aug 11, 2022, 2:42 PM

                                  @viragomann when pinging from LAN2 to LAN1 we got request and responses,
                                  The other way only requests

                                  V 1 Reply Last reply Aug 11, 2022, 2:46 PM Reply Quote 0
                                  • V
                                    viragomann @Aziz 1
                                    last edited by viragomann Aug 11, 2022, 2:49 PM Aug 11, 2022, 2:46 PM

                                    @aziz-1 said in Static route over OpenVPN VPN:

                                    The other way only requests

                                    So that's the point where you should check the firewall on the destination device.

                                    Do you get responses if you ping a LAN2 device from LAN1 pfSense?

                                    To be sure, are both VPN endpoints the default gateway in their local networks?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    17 out of 24
                                    • First post
                                      17/24
                                      Last post
                                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.