Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    SG-3100 ram disk question

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Official Netgate® Hardware
    29 Posts 4 Posters 2.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      mcury Rebel Alliance @stephenw10
      last edited by

      @stephenw10 said in SG-3100 ram disk question:

      You'll find that the usage is much higher when pfBlocker updates. Probably around double what you see there now.

      hm, ramdisk for /var is set to 850M, and not problems yet, I've been monitoring and so far so good.
      Do you think I'll face problems with this size?

      In case of a pfsense reinstall and config restore, I would disable the ram disk just to be safe.

      dead on arrival, nowhere to be found.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        I think that's big enough for pfBlocker to update.
        I'm not sure if a RAM disk that size is sustainable on the 3100. But it could be the years of battling kernel memory limits we had before we switched to tmpfs making me paranoid! 😉

        Before that ~120MB was the most you could set. That's what I use on most installs:

        [22.05-RELEASE][admin@fw1.stevew.lan]/root: df -h
        Filesystem                      Size    Used   Avail Capacity  Mounted on
        /dev/diskid/DISK-9E18E959s2a    7.0G    2.3G    4.1G    36%    /
        devfs                           1.0K    1.0K      0B   100%    /dev
        /dev/diskid/DISK-9E18E959s1      34M    2.0M     32M     6%    /boot/u-boot
        tmpfs                            80M    2.2M     78M     3%    /tmp
        tmpfs                           120M     34M     86M    28%    /var
        devfs                           1.0K    1.0K      0B   100%    /var/dhcpd/dev
        

        Steve

        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          mcury Rebel Alliance @stephenw10
          last edited by

          @stephenw10 I'll be testing and in case of problems I'll post here to help others that try this same approach.

          Thanks stephenw10

          I was getting around 2TB a year of writes before making this change.. Almost 5 years using device already :)

          [22.05-RELEASE][root@pfsense.home.arpa]/root: iostat -x
                                  extended device statistics  
          device       r/s     w/s     kr/s     kw/s  ms/r  ms/w  ms/o  ms/t qlen  %b  
          flash/sp       0       0      0.0      0.0     8     0     0     8    0   0 
          mmcsd0         0       0      1.5      4.0     1    10     0     6    0   0 
          mmcsd0bo       0       0      0.0      0.0     0     0     0     0    0   0 
          mmcsd0bo       0       0      0.0      0.0     0     0     0     0    0   0 
          [22.05-RELEASE][root@pfsense.home.arpa]/root: uptime 
          10:25AM  up 18:38, 1 user, load averages: 0.29, 0.28, 0.25
          

          dead on arrival, nowhere to be found.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • F
            FSC830
            last edited by

            I am a bit confused about the RAM disk limits.
            At my SG-3100 the limit is:

            Maximum total size of all RAM disks cannot exceed available memory: 269.75 MiB
            

            To which packages/options/values/... is the limit referring/calculating?

            I do not use RAM disks any longer since my issues, just to still curiosity 😉 .

            Regards

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by stephenw10

              You are probably running an older version before we switched to tmpfs?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • F
                FSC830
                last edited by FSC830

                Following your link ends in #12145.

                For various reasons we may want to switch the RAM disks from ufs on md devices to tmpfs .
                

                What is a md device, the internal MMC?
                Is there a diffence when using a SSD instead (ada0)?

                Regards

                Edit: Dashboard widget shows tmpfs!?
                b105c935-7e14-4d78-98b2-11c61f4f5dde-grafik.png

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  md there is memory disk: https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=md

                  There's no difference to the ram disks between booting from eMMC or SSD. RAM disks are more common on eMMC installs where drive ware is more of an issue.

                  If /var/run is tmpfs you must be running 22.01 or newer. It's possible the limit detection was not updated for 22.01 and you are still seeing it rather than in 22.05?

                  Steve

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • F
                    FSC830
                    last edited by

                    I updated from 22.01 to 22.05 at June, 28th at eMMC and did a complete new install from scratch to SSD at July 1st, 2022.
                    Afterwards I restored from ACB the settings, no idea, if the limit is also an outcome of the restore.

                    Regards

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      Are you actually using most of the reset of the RAM then? Perhaps you really only have 270MB available.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • F
                        FSC830
                        last edited by

                        The command top shows:

                        CPU: 43.8% user,  0.0% nice, 50.0% system,  0.0% interrupt,  6.3% idle
                        Mem: 88M Active, 464M Inact, 168M Wired, 84M Buf, 1297M Free
                        
                        

                        This matches the total of 2GB.
                        Are there any other commands available, "free" or "/proc/meminfo" seems to be not included in OS?

                        Regards

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          Try running: sysctl -a | grep kmem

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • F
                            FSC830
                            last edited by

                            @stephenw10 said in SG-3100 ram disk question:

                            sysctl -a | grep kmem

                            The outcome is:

                            [22.05-RELEASE][admin@xxx]/root: sysctl -a | grep kmem
                            vm.uma_kmem_total: 46063616
                            vm.uma_kmem_limit: 328835072
                            vm.kmem_map_free: 282771456
                            vm.kmem_map_size: 46063616
                            vm.kmem_size_scale: 3
                            vm.kmem_size_max: 328833434
                            vm.kmem_size_min: 12582912
                            vm.kmem_zmax: 65536
                            vm.kmem_size: 328835072
                            
                            

                            Regards

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              Hmm, well there's the ~270MB. I don't expect that to apply with tmpfs though. A 650MB drive would be impossible to set it if was. I wonder if that value was set before the gui validity check was added and it's simply never used more than the available kmem.

                              I have to say I wouldn't recommend setting anything too large in the 3100 anyway.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                Yeah, it still checks against available kernel memory:
                                https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/blob/master/src/usr/local/www/system_advanced_misc.php#L356

                                That could probably be removed with tmpfs there but it's only a significant restriction on arm32 and limiting ram disk size there is not terrible anyway.

                                https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/13508

                                Steve

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.